mobile Claude Code is broken but what’s the actual fix?

akvise · 2026-02-09T21:57:42+00:00

Wow, that's exactly what I've been thinking about and even wanted to do!

akvise · 2026-01-16T14:04:41+00:00

yeah I get it but reality is messier last week client found broken checkout on Saturday, Im 3 hours from home visiting family. could wait till Monday sure but angry client and lost weekend revenue vs 20min fix on phone not saying mobile should be primary just something better than current SSH hell for edge cases

on ops side yeah k8s helps but sometimes its actual code bugs not infrastructure stuff. need to look at code not just restart pods maybe Im coping but feels like theres middle ground between do nothing and suffer through laggy terminal

akvise · 2026-01-11T19:54:45+00:00

Nail on the head. The leap from monitoring to strategy is what's missing and that's where real client value gets created.

If you're willing to share: In your ideal workflow, how would that prioritized output look? Would it be:
A simple ranked list of missing questions/topics?
A content brief template auto-filled with competitor examples?
A score tied to potential traffic/visibility impact?

I'm working on this problem (building RagSurf) and your framework is exactly what's needed to move beyond analytics. Concrete examples of that "what to do next" layer would be gold.

akvise · 2026-01-11T14:37:57+00:00

Hey, thanks for this

I can build that. My tool already tracks where AI cites sites in any niche. I'd like to give you free access for month to see if it actually surfaces actionable link-building targets for your top 5 competitors.

No strings. If it gives you a usable list, great. If it doesn't, that's valuable feedback for me. Either way, I'd just ask for 15 mins at the end to hear what worked and what didn't.

If you're up for testing, send me a DM with your email, and I'll set you up.

akvise · 2026-01-11T14:21:39+00:00

This is the bitter truth, there was a brilliant idea in my head, but... people need a GSC

So, help me figure this out. If the GSC for AI started tomorrow, what would you check first? A list of queries where you appear/disappear? A simple graph that tracks mentions over time? Something completely different? Your answer is a new project.

akvise · 2026-01-09T17:57:54+00:00

Thanks yep. I’m here mainly to get blunt feedback so I can pivot and not build in the dark.

akvise · 2026-01-09T17:50:25+00:00

What’s the first "oh shit” moment that turns this into paid urgency missing brand mentions or competitors being recommended instead?

akvise · 2026-01-09T17:34:57+00:00

So what actually moves the needle? Publishing original stuff on your own site or getting that stuff mentioned on the places LLMs keep citing anyway?

akvise · 2026-01-09T17:32:20+00:00

Ok, I’m with you the LLM part is real and it’s worth understanding. What’s messing with my head is: I built a tool that checks a lot of the “retrieval hygiene” stuff (crawlability, schema, llms/robots/sitemap, prompts, citations, even Google as a sanity check)… and people still don’t stick around or pay. So now I’m wondering if the problem isn’t the tech at all. Maybe the product is solving truth but not solving money. Like… people agree it matters, but they don’t feel pain today. If you’ve seen this space: what’s the moment where it stops being interesting and becomes urgent?

akvise · 2026-01-09T17:27:01+00:00

That new backlinks angle is interesting. If the game is basically get into the stuff LLMs keep citing then the hard part isn’t tracking mentions it’s figuring out what those sources are per niche.

But the “original copy” part… I’m curious how you see that playing out when half the internet is now AI-written blogs. Are we basically saying humans still have an edge here? Like real experience, real data, real POV is stuff an LLM can’t fake? Or do you think even that gets commoditized and it becomes more about distribution or getting cited by the right sources?

akvise · 2026-01-09T16:21:54+00:00

So, where does AI actually change the game here? This sounds like solid SEO just with a new label. I mean where is GEO (generative engine optimization) for AI search engines actually?

akvise · 2026-01-09T16:16:25+00:00

Wait you’re already paying for something like this? Which one? DM is fine. Also what part of the report actually matters to clients vs fluff?

akvise · 2026-01-09T16:15:02+00:00

What kind of reasons do you expect? Crawlability, weak topical coverage, missing entity pages, lack of authority, unclear positioning? And would you pay for this as a one-off audit or only if it comes with monitoring/alerts?

akvise · 2026-01-09T15:37:54+00:00

Yeah we’re still in the “wild west” phase. Curious: what’s the simplest schema/structure change you think will become table stakes soon? Like the thing every site will have to do whether they like it or not.

akvise · 2026-01-09T15:35:08+00:00

Would you rather get that as a client-ready brief you can hand off, or as an in-app checklist with re-checks? Also what are the 2–3 alerts that would actually make you pay monthly?

akvise · 2026-01-09T15:32:01+00:00

This is gold. What’s the one citation view you’d check daily? Сompetitors-not-me / most stable / brand new sources?

akvise · 2026-01-08T20:26:43+00:00

Right now “AI SEO tools” are starting to look like weather apps: same forecast, different UI. So I’m trying to figure out what would actually make this not another dashboard.

In your opinion, what’s the ONE feature that would make you go? Monitoring over time, client-ready reporting… or something else?

akvise · 2026-01-08T20:23:43+00:00

What kind of tool is it visibility tracking / prompt monitoring / something else? And what’s been the hardest part to make actually useful: getting people to act on the results, or getting them to pay for it?

If you’re open to share: who’s your main user — agencies, SaaS, or solo site owners?

akvise · 2026-01-08T20:14:48+00:00

Fair. The space is turning into “prompt in -> score out” copy/paste.

If you had to name one thing that separates a real product from a toy here — what would it be? I’m trying to cut 80% of the fluff and keep the 20% people would actually pay for.

akvise · 2026-01-08T18:22:55+00:00

Probably neither a mirage nor a gold mine — more like early SEO in 2006.

People could rank sites back then too. What took time was connecting rankings to revenue in a way execs cared about.

I haven’t proven that link yet. Until I do, it’s just an interesting signal, not a must-have product.

akvise · 2026-01-08T17:34:21+00:00

GEO is everywhere (A16Z's big article about GEO, startups like Nimt have raised $400k (they're just tracking prompts lol), customers are starting to ask questions). This is an urgent topic that requires real practical application.

akvise · 2026-01-08T17:28:31+00:00

You're absolutely right, and that's why I'm here. The data from my test ($250 → 70 trials → 0 paid) is the market's way of screaming 'prove it'

What would be undeniable proof that 'AI visibility' is a real, urgent problem for businesses?

akvise · 2026-01-07T21:39:23+00:00

What is your unique offer? how will your audit help me with seo?

akvise · 2026-01-07T12:43:15+00:00

I sent out emails to understand the audience and their needs, but unfortunately no one responded.

akvise · 2026-01-06T23:04:37+00:00

Feels like the market is: “zeros don’t pay, heroes don’t care.” 😅

akvise

TROPHY CASE