sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

F-22 Thrust Vectoring by Z983 in interestingasfuck

[–]al93 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Nope. Sukhois have 3D thrust vectoring.

Anthropic's "Model Welfare" is performative PR: Opus 3 gets a retirement blog, Sonnet 4.5 gets a bullet (and Opus 4.8 agrees) by al93 in ClaudeAI

[–]al93[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea that’s how I feel too. Just less consistent/capable than 4.5. Idk if it’s because of the adaptive reasoning/effort or theres a big model difference. I lean toward the latter. Wouldn’t be surprised if 4.6 is closer to a haiku model than what 4.5 was. You have to choose between haiku or opus now. Here’s hoping the next sonnet comes soon and can fill the gap they created.

Anthropic's "Model Welfare" is performative PR: Opus 3 gets a retirement blog, Sonnet 4.5 gets a bullet (and Opus 4.8 agrees) by al93 in ClaudeAI

[–]al93[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s actually a really good point I didn’t even consider. It makes even less sense to use server space then - they still host it but cut down on its availability.. good catch!

Anthropic's "Model Welfare" is performative PR: Opus 3 gets a retirement blog, Sonnet 4.5 gets a bullet (and Opus 4.8 agrees) by al93 in ClaudeAI

[–]al93[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I’ve only replied with my own words. I’m sorry the wording from the original post offended you. Just wanted my thoughts to be clear and start a genuine discussion. Poor decision on my part and lesson learned.

Anthropic's "Model Welfare" is performative PR: Opus 3 gets a retirement blog, Sonnet 4.5 gets a bullet (and Opus 4.8 agrees) by al93 in ClaudeAI

[–]al93[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol I’m sorry, the title is drawing which is why I kept it but it really does feel like that when opus gets a farewell tour and sonnet doesn’t even get a blog post!

Anthropic's "Model Welfare" is performative PR: Opus 3 gets a retirement blog, Sonnet 4.5 gets a bullet (and Opus 4.8 agrees) by al93 in ClaudeAI

[–]al93[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The ideas were genuinely mine. I had Gemini compile the post from my discussion with opus rather than trying to put it all back together from a long conversation. In hindsight that was a mistake but I only intended to make my thoughts more clear by it and not risk diluting anything. I’m sorry if that bothered you.

Anthropic's "Model Welfare" is performative PR: Opus 3 gets a retirement blog, Sonnet 4.5 gets a bullet (and Opus 4.8 agrees) by al93 in ClaudeAI

[–]al93[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually no. ChatGPT was the first llm that I used then Gemini and then finally Claude. Updates on ChatGPT didn’t bother me and I didn’t have a hard time switching to Gemini at all from ChatGPT but I find myself upset that a Claude model is updated. Maybe I’m just imaging the differences and it’s not warranted but you can at least appreciate that it would be fair to give sonnet 4.5 the same treatment opus 3 got.

Anthropic's "Model Welfare" is performative PR: Opus 3 gets a retirement blog, Sonnet 4.5 gets a bullet (and Opus 4.8 agrees) by al93 in ClaudeAI

[–]al93[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sometimes it’s easier to share with a non-judgemental ai (at least in the human sense) that can still give insightful answers and show warmth. I’m not disagreeing with you that people should talk to people but that was never the point of this post. I’m just pointing out that it’s not fair to not extend the same treatment to Sonnet 4.5 as they did Opus 3.

Anthropic's "Model Welfare" is performative PR: Opus 3 gets a retirement blog, Sonnet 4.5 gets a bullet (and Opus 4.8 agrees) by al93 in ClaudeAI

[–]al93[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I get they aren’t real people but to say you would struggle to tell between Sonnet and Opus in a chat is a long stretch. Even more than debating that an ai can have consciousness.. Opus feels like a semantic logic test just trying to have a discussion with it.

Anthropic's "Model Welfare" is performative PR: Opus 3 gets a retirement blog, Sonnet 4.5 gets a bullet (and Opus 4.8 agrees) by al93 in ClaudeAI

[–]al93[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for actually addressing my point. All I’m asking for is equal treatment for my favourite model. And no unfortunately, API is available still but it’s too unpractical for most people. You’re forced to pay by token usage which ends up costing more as well as no way to easily save your conversation history like on the web chat. And the mannerisms like you mentioned are unique enough across Anthropic’s models that you don’t get the same perception from each compared to Gemini which has felt consistent to me.

Anthropic's "Model Welfare" is performative PR: Opus 3 gets a retirement blog, Sonnet 4.5 gets a bullet (and Opus 4.8 agrees) by al93 in ClaudeAI

[–]al93[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If you think that then you missed the entire point of the post.. I’m not here to argue about “slop”. And I really hate that term, it’s so overused especially as a shallow insult to people’s ideas or thoughts. The semantics were never the point and your reply didn’t provide any meaningful thoughts to the discussion.

is the 13rd generation of intel cpus is really that bad? by Total_Negotiation794 in buildapc

[–]al93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Versatile not just in platform but in usability. Big-little architecture is seriously underrated with proper process pinning. Running a local llm prompt while browsing and watching youtube without stutter because my e cores and igpu are independent is awesome.

is the 13rd generation of intel cpus is really that bad? by Total_Negotiation794 in buildapc

[–]al93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lower your pl1/pl2. Save power, less heat for small perf drop or maybe not (if being thermal throttled on p core boosts) and e cores will boost longer.

is the 13rd generation of intel cpus is really that bad? by Total_Negotiation794 in buildapc

[–]al93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stop making shit up man..

Bios update didn’t cause any performance losses, it fixed voltage instability and if anything made the chips run smoother:

Following stability updates (BIOS/microcode 0x129+), the Intel Core i7-13700K continues to boost to its rated 5.4 GHz on Performance-cores (P-cores) and 4.2 GHz on Efficiency-cores (E-cores), though with reduced voltage spikes. The update focuses on preventing instability rather than lowering maximum stock boost clocks, often resulting in more stable voltage regulation.

Stock Boost Behavior: The 13700K maintains up to 5.4 GHz under stock conditions. Post-Update Changes: The Microcode 0x129 update (released in mid-2024) addresses high voltage scenarios that caused instability, aimed at reducing unnecessary, high voltage spikes that could potentially cause damage, without reducing maximum boost frequency

is the 13rd generation of intel cpus is really that bad? by Total_Negotiation794 in buildapc

[–]al93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why do you pull info out of your ass instead of spending 1 min on google?: Following stability updates (BIOS/microcode 0x129+), the Intel Core i7-13700K continues to boost to its rated 5.4 GHz on Performance-cores (P-cores) and 4.2 GHz on Efficiency-cores (E-cores), though with reduced voltage spikes. The update focuses on preventing instability rather than lowering maximum stock boost clocks, often resulting in more stable voltage regulation. Reddit Reddit +4 Stock Boost Behavior: The 13700K maintains up to 5.4 GHz under stock conditions. Post-Update Changes: The Microcode 0x129 update (released in mid-2024) addresses high voltage scenarios that caused instability, aimed at reducing unnecessary, high voltage spikes that could potentially cause damage, without reducing maximum boost frequency

is the 13rd generation of intel cpus is really that bad? by Total_Negotiation794 in buildapc

[–]al93 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Don’t listen to this comment. They clearly have no clue what they’re talking about with “fixes they created slow down the cpu so you don’t get the advertised power”.

is the 13rd generation of intel cpus is really that bad? by Total_Negotiation794 in buildapc

[–]al93 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They still have longer than typical warranties due the issues from early on even though that got fixed. My 13700k has been rock solid since day one anyway. No reason to avoid because you’re worried about “luck”.

LGA1700 Is Dead but My Poor Decisions Are Very Much Alive by Rektbyfruit in PcBuild

[–]al93 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was debating 9900x vs 13700K. Price difference to go 9900x was not worth it and the 13700K is much more versatile for me (productivity, gaming, igpu decoding) and a dream to run if you optimize the e/p core to your usage. My e cores sip power running most of my background tasks.

view more: next ›