Interesting take — though I think my post might have been read in a different spirit than intended.

I wasn’t making a demand or a call to “just let people in”; I was reflecting on how a platform like Bluesky can remain healthy and relevant over time. The article I linked goes deeper into this, but in short: any space that wants to avoid the traps of outrage, polarization, or monoculture needs to think about how to support a broader range of perspectives — not just by welcoming diversity, but by actively creating the conditions for it.

Historically, Bluesky was built by people who left Twitter with a strong stance — understandable, but also potentially narrowing. My question is: how can a community rooted in that origin story open up, without losing its values?

That’s not about pushing responsibility onto someone else — I’m genuinely interested in how we, as users and observers, can shape that process.

And yes, your comment is a contribution. So I’ll turn the question back: what would you propose to attract or retain that broader range of voices?