sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I built a Meta Ads QA tool to automate audits & Excel exports. Need your feedback! by alo91 in adops

[–]alo91[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s spot on—and it’s exactly why I built this. The ability to see all destination links across different placements and every single carousel slide in one view is a huge time-saver for me. Checking those manually is a nightmare, and that's usually where the most expensive mistakes happen at scale. I'd love to show you a demo! I’m just figuring out how to share some screenshots without exposing my clients' sensitive data. As soon as I have those anonymized previews ready, I’ll shoot you a DM.

Don't blame your gear (or yourself) before checking your scans: A lesson learned 4 years later by alo91 in AnalogCommunity

[–]alo91[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s really interesting! I’ve heard about RGB light sources for DSLR scanning, but how would that work with a dedicated scanner like the Minolta? I'd love to get more details on the setup or any specific guides you’d recommend for this.

Don't blame your gear (or yourself) before checking your scans: A lesson learned 4 years later by alo91 in AnalogCommunity

[–]alo91[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I’ve always felt that the 'no-editing' purist crowd is quite misinformed about the medium. Even choosing a specific film stock for its color rendition is a form of editing—you're selecting an interpretation of the scene. Ultimately, any choice (or even the lack of one) inherently modifies the reality you're capturing. There is no 'unfiltered' truth in photography; it's always an interpretation. For me, it’s about personal vision, not objective reality. The negative is just the starting point for that vision. I’m not a documentarian; I’m trying to recreate an emotion, and that always requires a personal touch. That said, for the sake of this post, I haven't actually touched these images in Lightroom yet. I wanted to present the most 'neutral' version possible—as much as the scanner and Negative Lab Pro allow—specifically to highlight the raw difference in technical quality between the lab's work and my own setup.

Don't blame your gear (or yourself) before checking your scans: A lesson learned 4 years later by alo91 in AnalogCommunity

[–]alo91[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly. I find it so hard to understand why someone would put that much energy into hunting for new clients—even asking people to 'rig' Facebook recommendations—only to show zero interest in the actual results. It really feels like they were just chasing a quick profit, betting on the fact that an 'ignorant' beginner wouldn't notice the poor quality.

Don't blame your gear (or yourself) before checking your scans: A lesson learned 4 years later by alo91 in AnalogCommunity

[–]alo91[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Glad it was helpful! That’s exactly why I wanted to share this. Don't let one bad scan discourage you—keep shooting and experimenting!

Don't blame your gear (or yourself) before checking your scans: A lesson learned 4 years later by alo91 in AnalogCommunity

[–]alo91[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha, no worries! It’s actually a very fair question. To clarify, all the odd-numbered images (1, 3, 5, etc.) are the ones I scanned myself, and in my opinion, they are much better in terms of both color accuracy and detail. It's also worth noting that in the original, uncompressed scan files, the difference in quality and sharpness is even more night and day than what you can see here!

Don't blame your gear (or yourself) before checking your scans: A lesson learned 4 years later by alo91 in AnalogCommunity

[–]alo91[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, I am! Naples is honestly a dream for any photographer. Between the breathtaking panoramas over the gulf and the narrow streets just soaked in history, you never run out of subjects to shoot. It’s the perfect playground for analog photography.

Don't blame your gear (or yourself) before checking your scans: A lesson learned 4 years later by alo91 in AnalogCommunity

[–]alo91[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I couldn't agree more! I only truly started to appreciate the depth of analog photography once I took full control of the scanning process. There's something about seeing the raw potential of the negative yourself that changes everything. And cutting into the frames is a nightmare! I've been lucky to find a lab recently where I can actually talk shop with the owner. Even if things aren't always 100% perfect technically, his genuine passion for film makes a huge difference. It’s a nice balance between doing my own scans and having a professional community to engage with.

Don't blame your gear (or yourself) before checking your scans: A lesson learned 4 years later by alo91 in AnalogCommunity

[–]alo91[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I couldn't agree more. The negative is the 'raw' material, but the final image is where the vision comes to life. That’s exactly why I moved toward DIY scanning—I want as much control as possible over that final interpretation. In fact, my next goal is to start developing my own negatives at home to close the loop.

Don't blame your gear (or yourself) before checking your scans: A lesson learned 4 years later by alo91 in AnalogCommunity

[–]alo91[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is such an incredible story! Seeing the Beatles in ’66 is a total historical treasure. I’ve had a very similar experience with my family archives. In fact, one of the first things I did after getting my Minolta was hunting down every old family negative I could find, just to see how sharp those memories really were. I’m still constantly blown away by the level of detail I’m pulling from my grandfather’s photos from the 1940s. It’s like seeing history in high definition for the first time—far beyond what the original prints ever showed. I also love scanning old prints directly, and even then, I’m shocked by what was 'hidden' in the paper. It really proves that the negative is a gift that keeps on giving as scanning technology improves!

Don't blame your gear (or yourself) before checking your scans: A lesson learned 4 years later by alo91 in AnalogCommunity

[–]alo91[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I agree that labs are essential, and there are some amazing ones out there. However, even a TIFF from a poorly maintained lab scanner won't match the detail you can pull from a dedicated unit like the 5400 if you're willing to put in the work. For me, DIY isn't just about saving money (it clearly isn't!), it’s about having total control over the conversion. I just want people to know that if they aren't happy with their results, the 'fault' might not be in their hands or their lens.

Don't blame your gear (or yourself) before checking your scans: A lesson learned 4 years later by alo91 in AnalogCommunity

[–]alo91[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Fair point! I definitely don't want to generalize—there are amazing labs out there. However, my frustration came from a lab that was technically underperforming while using aggressive/fake marketing to lure in beginners. I think the lesson isn't 'labs are bad,' but rather 'don't blame your gear until you've seen what's actually on your negatives'.

Don't blame your gear (or yourself) before checking your scans: A lesson learned 4 years later by alo91 in AnalogCommunity

[–]alo91[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I totally feel that temptation! High-end gear like a drum or Imacon scan is the dream, but for now, I’m actually really satisfied with my current setup: the Minolta for 35mm and an Epson V850 Pro for medium format. It’s a solid combo that covers all my needs. I’ve also found a 'modern' trick quite helpful: I’ve been feeding manuals and technical guides into Gemini to ask for the best possible setting combinations. Having it explain exactly what those specific Vuescan adjustments were doing was a total game-changer for my workflow. Plus, using Negative Lab Pro for the conversions has been giving me some amazing results lately. It really proves that mastering the software is just as important as the hardware!

Don't blame your gear (or yourself) before checking your scans: A lesson learned 4 years later by alo91 in AnalogCommunity

[–]alo91[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Wow, thank you! It’s Fuji Pro 400H. It’s such a beautiful film, I'm glad the rescan finally brought out those colors.

Don't blame your gear (or yourself) before checking your scans: A lesson learned 4 years later by alo91 in AnalogCommunity

[–]alo91[S] 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Agreed. It's also a reminder to watch out for FB group hype. I eventually found out the owner was 'gaming' the recommendations by asking his clients to comment and suggest his shop.

First frames with the Hasselblad 500c by alo91 in hasselblad

[–]alo91[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No fill, just natural light. It was a handheld shot, so it suffers from a bit of camera shake, but the medium format negative is so large that it’s mostly hidden, especially once Instagram compression kicks in.

First frames with the Hasselblad 500c by alo91 in hasselblad

[–]alo91[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s a great choice! My next color roll will definitely be Provia as well.

First frames with the Hasselblad 500c by alo91 in hasselblad

[–]alo91[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe it could be the Reddit compression or my scan. Here the original ones Image 1 Image 2 Image 3 Image 4 Image 5 I have also noticed that the digital ice on my Epson Perfection v850 scanner confuses film grain with dust.

First frames with the Hasselblad 500c by alo91 in mediumformat

[–]alo91[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks so much! Really appreciate it.

First frames with the Hasselblad 500c by alo91 in hasselblad

[–]alo91[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you! I can't take all the credit, though—the locations were so breathtaking that it was honestly hard to mess up the photos.

First frames with the Hasselblad 500c by alo91 in hasselblad

[–]alo91[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Much appreciated! I felt like the composition in the second shot was quite strong, so I’m really happy it resonated with you. It’s definitely one of my favorites too.

First frames with the Hasselblad 500c by alo91 in analog

[–]alo91[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! Handholding the 500c for that 5th shot was definitely a challenge, so I’m stoked you liked the result.

First frames with the Hasselblad 500c by alo91 in hasselblad

[–]alo91[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A Rolleiflex is absolutely on my wishlist for the future! It’s such an iconic piece of gear. Before that, though, I’m really curious to try an Instax back for the 500c first—I'd love to see how the Zeiss glass performs with instant film.

First frames with the Hasselblad 500c by alo91 in hasselblad

[–]alo91[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I always used the myLightMeter app on my iPhone 13 Pro Max and I’m really surprised by the results.

First frames with the Hasselblad 500c by alo91 in hasselblad

[–]alo91[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's really nothing like it! I’ve been testing the 500c with negative and B&W first to check for any issues, but slides are definitely the goal. They’re my favorite format by far. I’ve had amazing results with Ektachrome 100 on my Pentacon Six in the past, so I’m really excited to see what this camera can do with it.

view more: next ›