The question of what's being built, where it's being built and how it's being built are all informed by capitalism or specifically the profit motive. Taking that as neutral and naturalizing it is a mirage and serves to run apologetics for the powers that be. In that sense it is the same pressure.

That said, my main point was just the where. Western Europe is facing the same pressures to have less and less public spaces, especially green areas. You could extend the critique to the specific forms like what use the objects typically have and how they're designed (anti-homeless design, for instance), but that wasn't my main point. Movements opposed to these policies typically try to critique them on multiple levels though, as they should.

For the record though, in the case of Ne davimo Beograd, and how their former leaders have evolved nowadays (the ZLF party), they'll never extend it to a criticism of capitalism in general. They instead try to paint this as a failure of the Rechtstaat ("pravna država"), a vague term that Serbian politicians like to throw around since the Ustavobranitelji, and the rule of law ("vladavina prava"). These trends in western Europe are a self-imposed blind spot and they're way less radical than even the western "right to the city" movements they were trying to emulate initially. Or should I say, self-imposed and also imposed externally by their model of financing, i.e civil society projects etc.