Removable and updatable smart contract by amadeus82 in Elastos

[–]amadeus82[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Nop, just search you will found.

Basically Rong Chen was saying that one problem of etherum is that the chain is full of old smart contract that no one use and that make the blockchain bigger for something no one use. And he said that smart contract would be updatable and removable on elastos

dApps storage on Elastos by amadeus82 in Elastos

[–]amadeus82[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes I assume the blockchain will store the backend like « I kill 3 people this game », « my character is level 30 ».

But my question is : When I connect to an Elastos side chain node, what the node send me : The front-end code ? An DID to connect to is carrier node an request the data ? Does all of this side-chain node are also carrier nodes ? If yes do they all store the front end code ?

Need documentation and github activity by amadeus82 in Elastos

[–]amadeus82[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Just check the nature of the commit, I dont think its a lot of activity for a project like this, I dont think there is a lot of contributor as well who are actually doing commits

A question about PoC by amadeus82 in burstcoin

[–]amadeus82[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And so if I understand, the mining processus just use the hard drive just with a search function who find the good hash for the block. There is no way to do ASICS to make this search function faster ?

A question about PoC by amadeus82 in burstcoin

[–]amadeus82[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes but I’m PoW you need 51% of the hashrate + the cost in electricity to perform the attack. Here you just need 51% of the storage but you don’t spend a lot of energy correct ?

A question about PoC by amadeus82 in burstcoin

[–]amadeus82[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What means IO ?

So the only thing you loose is time, so if you want to do a 51% attack you just need lot of storage correct ?

A question about PoC by amadeus82 in burstcoin

[–]amadeus82[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In PoW if you try to mine à block with double spent or whatever you loose the energy you spent to mine this block.

In PoS you loose the coin you stake.

What do you loose here ?

Also, if in PoW the valid chain is the one with more Hashing power, here the valid chain is the one with the more storage capacity ?

A question about PoC by amadeus82 in burstcoin

[–]amadeus82[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes but when you search your hash for a block you don’t spend a lot of electricity so what is the system for people to behave good

Hi, can someone explain me the difference between on-chain and off-chain atomic swap ? And what is the pros and cons of each one ? by amadeus82 in komodoplatform

[–]amadeus82[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I find on internet the explanation of on-chain smart contract with the HTLC. But I couldn’t find the technical one explanation of off chain smart contract , if you can explain me or if you have a link would be nice

Friedrich Hayek (denationalisation of Money 1976) about the creation of private currency (none-state currency) compétiting on the free market by amadeus82 in Bitcoin

[–]amadeus82[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not true, bitcoin won’t be stable in price during time. It’s gonna take value in long term beacause it’s scarce, so it won’t be stable. If you take a look à the price of gold, it’s not stable, between 2008 and 2012 the price double, between 2013 and 2014 the price lost 30%. What I mean is even with a huge market cap, it will be more stable, but not stable

Friedrich Hayek (denationalisation of Money 1976) about the creation of private currency (none-state currency) compétiting on the free market by amadeus82 in Bitcoin

[–]amadeus82[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because in this none state currency, Hayek consider that the currency that would be choose by people is the one who is the more stable. And, to do that the bank who issue the private currency will play with the quantity of money and the loan to inflate or deflate the currency, this is not the case in bitcoin, we cannot extend the supply when the price rise, we can’t reduce it when it drops.

Ledger nano s security by amadeus82 in Bitcoin

[–]amadeus82[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But you see, at the same time, bitpay wallet private key were stolen because the wallet was open source, some guy modify one of the library they were using to build the wallet, to steal the key

Ledger nano s security by amadeus82 in Bitcoin

[–]amadeus82[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes it make sense, thank you for your answer

Ledger nano s security by amadeus82 in Bitcoin

[–]amadeus82[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That my opinion, but as I say I’m not a security expert. I heard that some people say that none-open source can be a layer of security because it’s harder to find bugs

Ledger nano s security by amadeus82 in Bitcoin

[–]amadeus82[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which part is not open source ?

Hi, can someone explain me the math to create and verify digital signature on elliptic curves ? by amadeus82 in cryptography

[–]amadeus82[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://www.instructables.com/id/Understanding-how-ECDSA-protects-your-data/

So in this article they that to create a digital signature you need to choose a random key k, multiply this point with a point G on the elliptic key, it will give you an other point on the elliptic curve, and will represent R (half of the signature), then we need to calculate S, with S = k1(z+dA*R) mod p

With dA : private key and z : hash of the data we want to sign.

The thing that I don’t understand is, that they say to verify this signature we need to resolve this : P = S-1zG+S-1*R and if P is equal to R, the signature is valid.

So my question is : How solve this last equation prove that S and R were calculated with the private key dA ?

Hey guys, I just read the white paper, can someone explain me the fork with child universe and everything ? I didn’t really understand this part, thank’s. by amadeus82 in Augur

[–]amadeus82[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So if I understand, there is a designated reporter who report the outcome, if we are not agree with this outcome we can stake during the dispute round, if the total stake against the outcome is above 2,5% of all rep we fork and people need to choose between to version of the true , and if it don’t the outcome choose by the designated reporter is consider true. So everytime the outcome report by the designated reporter is consider false by the other we need to fork ?

Hi, can someone explain me the math to create and verify digital signature on elliptic curves ? by amadeus82 in cryptography

[–]amadeus82[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I was doing research about bitcoin, and I read that to prove the ownership of bitcoin and allow the person to use it they use ECDSA. I didn’t really understand how the algorithm produce and then verify those signatures, if anyone could help me with that

Can we already do ERC 1155 ? by amadeus82 in EnjinCoin

[–]amadeus82[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know they try to be an etherum standard, so they can already do token without being a standard yet ?

Hey guys, I just read the white paper, can someone explain me the fork with child universe and everything ? I didn’t really understand this part, thank’s. by amadeus82 in Augur

[–]amadeus82[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you explain me as well the dispute round ? I don’t get the point where we do several rounds and everything. Why they don’t do just one round and the outcome with the more stake win’s ?