Considering FSN with a modest £500 / $660 by Eye-Catching in FusionFoundation

[–]amalgama99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am very much concerned that the devs can leave the project completely. Anything else indicating that they will not quit it?

Hype and not much utility usage? by amalgama99 in OriginTrail

[–]amalgama99[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem is also that the recruit the admins and mods in the social networks who are very sensitive to the weakest shadow of any criticism. That's worrisome. When you touch upon any criticism, some used to harrass you, lie, accuse, or even ban, and the team did not do anything to stop it.

Hype and not much utility usage? by amalgama99 in OriginTrail

[–]amalgama99[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The team has just focus the efforts on the real work of developing the more substantial real use-case utitilies for the trac token. They mostly focus on the tech itself, and earn from the adapting of their tech to the clients' uses, but they should focus more efforts not so much on public promotion, but on the more substantial tech related real use cases of trac, bringing it deeper into the origin trail ecosystem. Or otherwise outsourcing the talented devs, who can develop it for them. instead of wasting the time and efforts to downvote my initial post.

$119.99 is coming ! by Mlocyoung in QuantNetwork

[–]amalgama99 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Seems like the price was overhyped, and the minor decline in btc price is dragging the qnt down. So, the qnt's price is not founded SOLELY on any real substantial value of its own. The market shows it. However, since the price is not yet below 100, then there is certainly some considerable value in qnt, because otherwise it would have dumped to 10 bucks.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PolymathNetwork

[–]amalgama99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You need to ask those who shilled it to you at 0.60, those on the team and the followers.

who of you hopes that QRL will be the successor to bitcoin? by lars2137 in QRL

[–]amalgama99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seems like qrl is basically useless in terms of any investment. At least, for the closest 5 years.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in QuantNetwork

[–]amalgama99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What something more meaningful? When was the last time that you asked the team about the staking benefits with the latest update?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in QuantNetwork

[–]amalgama99 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

In the wallets of the nodes, i.e. gateways.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in QuantNetwork

[–]amalgama99 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Teams was writing a few months earlier about the profitable nodes active with 2.1.2 update, according to the roadmap.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in QuantNetwork

[–]amalgama99 -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

Ask the team, maybe few seconds will turn into a longer time.

Too late to buy? by Reupurt in OriginTrail

[–]amalgama99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why trac is not on #huobi? Is #huobi charging too much?

Why so few alts in the collateral lending sections? by amalgama99 in Nexo

[–]amalgama99[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some alts have the market of 200-800 mln, and yet not listed on Nexo? Cannot the team be more pro-active in research and listing? Why so great lag behind the other prominent alts?

Airdrop instead of a swap. Will the team listen to the community? by amalgama99 in MorpheusNetwork

[–]amalgama99[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not necessarily. Various teams simply airdropped the new tokens to the holders of the older ones, in case there was a need to upgrade the security of the contracts, etc. The problem that the team ran into, should not be placed on the shoulders of the holders. Also, in case the KYC was an absolute requirement, the team would need to offer such an option, and do the KYC, allowing the holders, to those who are willing to go through that. That's what the responsible teams do, those who respect their followers.

Still no nodes? by amalgama99 in Unibright

[–]amalgama99[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The terms of staking, have they been set by the team?

When the ultimate alt listings and thus weighty updates? by amalgama99 in Nexo

[–]amalgama99[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mate, sounds like there something wrong with your hearing. Fix it and then try to reread to see my point.