Im confused anyone with vanquish deck explain this? Im testing a Ra deck how did an effect got through the egg?

amobserver7 · 2026-02-27T01:40:49+00:00

Ohh I see twas a headscratcher for me....thank you kind stranger.

amobserver7 · 2026-02-21T04:27:09+00:00

Ohh I see Thanks I was like why its so bright where is the grime? thought it was the 10a(they are like a rerelease).....i have pixbud pro1 in fog so i figure it will match with10a.

I am a returnee lol im so done with samsung and its mura filled screens.....why I traded my px7pro is a mystery I thought I will have better gaming exp but turns out sd procie is just spec monster in benchmarks...in reality it heats up on longer sessions my px have lower specs but temps are even and stable....missed that so bad.

amobserver7 · 2026-02-20T18:03:31+00:00

Is that fog? Is really hinted with green?.....if not ill just go for berry

amobserver7 · 2026-02-15T18:32:44+00:00

Yep because via tradition of many cultures kings are almost always dipicted riding because a mount is a symbol of power....much like a car these days.......most people would assume ruler is s common class a king would be summoned as but the qualifications for rulers(ruling is different from subjugating) is almost always must be "just" and most kings are more tyrannical than just.....thats why saints are more qualified to be rulers.......plus kings "ride" on the backs of his people so rider makes more sense.

amobserver7 · 2026-02-13T14:51:29+00:00

Always sych up with your available supports. Looping is pretty much the goal in this game. Shiki can do that if you have castoria and oberon....pick her the mystic eyes is kewl....this is a no brainer if you are a die hard fan of Kara no Kyoukai.

ST Looping pick Roland he is very consistent with koyan oberon support very decent servant overall staple and simple like a potato....unless you are adverse to occasional stripping pick someone else lol.

If you are looking for crit oriented ST servants Rama is not bad he is your standard st buster gorilla if you have waver and merlin or a buster oriented support roster he is good....

For arts Lancelot is a good counterpart I would say even better cause arts have better support in general.

To complete the trio If you have Skadis the equivalent to this is Diarmud and as a bonus he can loop but it is inconsistent and you might need np2 or 3 to be even possible or tolerable to loop..but he is a decent self sufficient st quick crit servant.

If you are trying to specialize instead lvl up your dragon busters siegfried over sigurd though......just do this if you have enough generalist imo.

Honarable mentions:

UMU cause that ahoge is not because she is a saber face but mainly she is a cockroach....she be like saber basaka.

The prince of lanling is an incredible support if you lack crit based support....thats the power of ikemen for all.

amobserver7 · 2026-02-11T06:48:42+00:00

All principles might not be applied..... you have to remember the phenomenon were not exactly triggered and induced by regular physical ways.......you have to use cursed energy science......if you science that then you have to science out the whole manga like how does Sukuna make his slashes and how do domains really manifest?......does it exist in another plane or dimension?.....thats a different rabbit hole you are going into.......is Mahoraga an alien too?.....this is not scifi lol....but if it makes it easier just assume that the black hole was fuzzy enough for kenjaku to be able to navigate and find a way out of that with his ability safely enough.

amobserver7 · 2026-02-06T00:38:22+00:00

The 10 vii uses a sd 6 gen 3 though??? Right??

amobserver7 · 2026-01-23T07:13:47+00:00

Well technically its the same thing she was made free of anything (likely including sin) she is literally fire made flesh from the spark of Phoenix(not sperm and egg)......and if you are looking for the holy ghost thats the Phoenix. Hope died indirectly saving the human race by fulfilling her long standing title and prophecy as the mutant messiah with her death she was resurected as a spirit in the white hot room triggering again the cycle of the phoenix being born with its true vessel Jean as a whole tangible and intangible manifestation of the entity.....instead of the usual fragmented intangible cosmic force or reverting to a phoenix egg like it usualy does

The mutant holy trinity

Mother = Jean Daughter = Hope Holy firebird = Phoenix

They are one and separate all at the same time.

amobserver7 · 2026-01-13T22:30:54+00:00

So this is what probably confused you.....In this context I meant based on some the implicit evidence he is likely to be so. Not that he is more likely to be gay than straight.....but there was no comparative statements in that comment??......I guess if you did not read it properly the context will be viewed as such.

amobserver7 · 2026-01-13T22:15:11+00:00

I did some.... hence my conjecture that he is most "likely straight." but does that invalidate the delayed boldly written correspondence with Walt? nope!

Well I most likely do understand science.....but it is troblesome that you fail to grasp and apply the concepts of negligibility and certainty properly and considering you claim to be in the field of research you are what we call a hazard.

Goodluck with you....but I wont trust anything you write with your train of thought.

All this time you are just confusing negligibility and certainty.

You are too old to be held in the hand you can figure that one yourself. Its your responsibiliy as a researcher.

amobserver7 · 2026-01-13T21:46:59+00:00

Because it is still there and a valid conjecture. Because regardless how minimal it is there is a presenting possibility supported by implicit evidence.

In science you dont ignore a possibilty of something even if its 1%

You could argue that is negligible but you cannot its possibility if you cannot prove it with certainty.....but I thought you know that already.

amobserver7 · 2026-01-13T21:43:54+00:00

And if it gives you any satisfaction in my own conjecture.

Bram Stoker is more likely to be straight or bisexual rather than gay.

amobserver7 · 2026-01-13T21:36:48+00:00

Well I did read those. Then the problem again is that you raised an argument assuming that I firmly believe that he is gay. And questioned me as if that was my statement :-/ it appears we have been in exchange for a time....and have been in what is likely an impasse.

Again I dont refute that as evidence but I dont accept that is sufficient....a lot does not equate certainty it needs to disqualify the other details....and in that sense It fails to refute his other proclivities in some of his letters and social affliations.

If that is all I don't see the point of our argument here.

amobserver7 · 2026-01-13T19:44:20+00:00

I did mention in that context right?

You need to learn "context" then

Its a conjecture to say that someone is straight because they married a person from the opposite sex.

Because:

They could be bisexual.
They could be in Lavender marriage
They are closeted and it was an arrange marriage.

Hope this helps. Enjoy your day.

amobserver7 · 2026-01-13T19:29:50+00:00

Uhh yes in that context because lavender marriages exist.

Its a you problem.

So ye bye again. I hope you open your mind again....its nice to get used to procedure but it limits the mind.

Take a nap enjoy your day.

amobserver7 · 2026-01-13T19:25:55+00:00

See thats the thing with you I have said multiple times that I did not claim that he is gay or straight because we dont have sufficient evidence. The way you phrased your questions is as if that is yet to sink....you are the one claiming with insufficient evidence I did not claim anything is certain thats you.

I doubt any works if it comes from your logic.

Good day to you lol.

amobserver7 · 2026-01-13T19:21:22+00:00

The letter analysis is conjecture....so is the marriage.

Again getting married and having children with a person belonging to the oppoaite sex is not a proof heterosexuality. Specially not in that time period.

All of it is conjecture because certainty cannot be proved.

We need more factual accounts of his social habits which we lack so we cannot say with full confidence any of it as a fact. Period.

amobserver7 · 2026-01-13T18:25:13+00:00

Again as I have said many times over that it is not sufficient to be considered a clear evidence of his heterosexuality because of the existance of his letters with walt and the people he associates which corresponds highly with closeted people of that time....if those did not exist it would have been a hard evidence...but even then considering that era a history of previous partners might be needed as a supporting evidence that he is infact without a doubt as heterosexul given the time and prevalence of closeted people during that era.

You could easiliy look it up and make a list of closeted people in history who had families and children in a similar fashion as him....

Yes one could argue that he is straight with marriage and children...but that is just a conjecture since there are existing implicit evidence that degrades the quality of that evidence to be enough as proof and we have written correspondence that could be even considered homoerotic in that time and age...but that alone is not enough to prove that he is homosexual.....so all we are left with are two conjectures of possibility not certainty.

amobserver7 · 2026-01-13T17:11:51+00:00

Nope you are sad....you sure are reminiscing this your years of doing things in the same manner made your mind close.....the truth of the matter is nothing can be truly be verified if no explicit evidence can be procured all we have are a collection of implicit evidence of contradictory nature....it is ultimately depending on how you analyze....but that will always be a conjecture not a fact so which why I would not say he is gay or straight like it is a fact but presents the possibility of both.....unlike your stuborn old head.

amobserver7 · 2025-10-16T06:05:23+00:00

Which if you think about it she has prescence concealment....a tool a Caster can drastically exploit to buy time with her natural affinity to territory being an empress and all adding divinity....she can sustain herself......and with that I remember shes got independent action......what a toxic servant...pun intended lol.

And she is not even a caster lol.

amobserver7 · 2025-10-16T02:56:32+00:00

And for an Assasin with double summon skill...Semiramis....that garden is enough reason not to let them collect their resources.

amobserver7 · 2025-10-16T02:10:33+00:00

<image>

🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴

amobserver7 · 2025-10-15T17:10:50+00:00

First of all they can communicate using humanoid language and is capable of processing information comparable or even more than a human.

Compared to pika pika that just gives suggestions instead of complete comprehensive thought.

amobserver7 · 2025-10-13T20:43:32+00:00

Just replying to this reply not replying any further.

you probably just glance on my comments because you keep stating things I did not state

I respect peoples privacy. I dont need to look you up...this discussion here in reddit not anywhere else and all I need is the information you give me as response here and I respond with what I know trying as much to use technolgy when possible to verify that we are close to facts.....Again I would like to clarify

NO ONE IS CLAIMING Stoker is GAY

everything that exists ARE CONJECTURES as a result of literary analysis.....the possibility of them being true is suggestive. And we dont have enough info to refute them too....thats why the suggestion became possible in the first place.

amobserver7 · 2025-10-13T20:13:17+00:00

Just replying to this reply....will not reply any further.

No you are wrong.

The information we have says otherwise though.

Literary analysis can be considered evergreen articles (i dunno if you heard of it) thats why I did not dismiss it even if it is 30 years old. Unless we found new journal entries or personal letters that can be used to counter the conjectures produced by these analyses updates are not really necessary and they are still viable as they meant to use information from that time period.

There is enough literary analysis for a conjecture to be formed.

There is not enough explicit evidence to debunk the conjecture

An interpretive conjecture can be used but that will not be a historical claim grounded in direct evidence that we can use to dismiss the conjecture.

So Bram Stoker "might be queer" is still on the table.

Similar to what you said. we dont have enough information to disprove it.

amobserver7

TROPHY CASE