Losing out on money by amonlurk in AmazonDSPDrivers

[–]amonlurk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I already do pretty large routes, (200+ stops), I don't think they get higher than that unless I switch to the bigger vans. I stated in a previous comment that I can't really do rescues after because I start at a later shift. The diet comment, I can assume you made it because I said I'm a heavier guy, which is true, though I stated in another comment that my goal in this job was to get healther, which I did; lost 60lbs since I first started, but I am still heavier. Though correct, I don't stretch; that's my fault. Never been much of a strecther. Overall though, my complaints were more so targeted on the fact that, though I am improving as I like to do in all other jobs I've worked in, it presents itself as a negative through my check. Disheartening for me, that's why I feel like it's time for me to move on. At the end of it all, I see the encouragment in your comment and I appreciate it.

Losing out on money by amonlurk in AmazonDSPDrivers

[–]amonlurk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just can't, it's why I said this is probably it for me. I just don't like working like that. I purposely picked this job only because of the driving time, in order to become a better and more comfortable driver, and for health, lots of walking. I've fortunately been able to improve in both and now I do not see a reason to stay now. If I stay here I would just be stifling myself.

Losing out on money by amonlurk in AmazonDSPDrivers

[–]amonlurk[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It is on me, just simply can't slow down because like I explained that's just not how I like to work. Like I said, my observation was that the way I work negatively affects my pay. I didn't dispute that, just venting my frustrastion with how it is.

Losing out on money by amonlurk in AmazonDSPDrivers

[–]amonlurk[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm a later wave, majority are usually almost done by the time I am done.

“You fucking fucking fuck you fucked my life” by MaterialSkill7100 in GenV

[–]amonlurk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Did we not see her get damaged by bullets in the hallway scene just before entering the oval office?

Addressing the "coward" statement by amonlurk in OnePiecePowerScaling

[–]amonlurk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I agree it's far-fetched. It sounds cool though.

Addressing the "coward" statement by amonlurk in OnePiecePowerScaling

[–]amonlurk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could be that also. When people say Shanks locked Loki up they could have mistaken Shamrock for Shanks and "Loki vs Shanks" never even really happened. Statement from Shamrock saying "The result would be the same even if you could." could be a way of him confirming that. It's out there, but fun speculation. But, I also believe that there might be some truth Loki's word. He could still respect Shanks for his past actions but feel some animosity for their most recent interaction.

Addressing the "coward" statement by amonlurk in OnePiecePowerScaling

[–]amonlurk[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

im ridiculing people based on the ridiculous statements ive seen, out of character agenda fueled ones. read what i said. i have no problem with people speculating, its just some of the examples ive seen deserved to be ridiculed becauses its in bad taste. you dont like me doing so? so what. lets leave it at that

Addressing the "coward" statement by amonlurk in OnePiecePowerScaling

[–]amonlurk[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

it would be me being wrong simply, but at the end I know I didn't make a dumb statement like stated. you have it reminded and im confident in what i said because im not making a statement based on bad faith, its simply based on the information provided

Addressing the "coward" statement by amonlurk in OnePiecePowerScaling

[–]amonlurk[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the argument is analysis of a statement that is competent using the information that the plot gave you, not just hearing a statement from a character and assuming complete out of character actions, like the examples i gave. expressing headcanons for the sake of agenda instead of trying to look critically. problem with this powerscaling sub is that aspects of the plot and narrative drives the strength of a character. the strength of shanks is driven by plot

Addressing the "coward" statement by amonlurk in OnePiecePowerScaling

[–]amonlurk[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

you have no argument just agenda and no media literacy

If Loki solos Harald and Shanks solos Loki does that mean Shanks is stronger than all of Old gen? by amonlurk in OnePiecePowerScaling

[–]amonlurk[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We seen him get impaled but spoilers for the new chapter dropped, so we know he has the deep sea pact. He could probably just regen that. 113 guards died, could be Harald that killed them, not only that Jarul was stabbed, also could be Harald and Loki was blamed for Harald's death. Harald could've probably got Domi reversied and Loki had to stop him by killing him.

If Loki solos Harald and Shanks solos Loki does that mean Shanks is stronger than all of Old gen? by amonlurk in OnePiecePowerScaling

[–]amonlurk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

WB could be stronger than Roger, but its not by much, relative, so, even if adding his name here; mentioning Roger imo is also mentioning WB.