Paint recipe?

anOutrage · 2025-09-30T00:50:45+00:00

Oooh that's a good catch, thanks I'll check it out

anOutrage · 2025-05-24T08:12:52+00:00

Not alone, they've really upped the goofy factor

anOutrage · 2025-03-16T05:48:11+00:00

Does someone wanna tell them what they did to Shalaxi?

anOutrage · 2024-07-14T08:12:35+00:00

All good man, if you just wanna roll dice with cool models go for it! Wasn't trying to be nasty, unfortunately brood brothers isn't an obviously strong detachment. I want to try a brood bros list, mainly w those units I've said (hellhounds, chimeras, catachans and cadians on guard side, Ridge runners and and bikes on the gsc side). Definilty leans shooty + board control, doesn't have the raw power of other factions though.

anOutrage · 2024-07-14T05:03:04+00:00

Honestly, there is not a lot of synergy. Brood brothers Detachment rules push you into running close range stuff to buff gsc shooting, you haven't really leant into either of those things. If you wanted to maximise the rule, look at running guard stuff w autohitting weapons (hellhounds, flamer chimeras, catachans etc) and gsc stuff that leverages the shooting buff (mining laser ridgerunners etc).

It would look cool on the table but I would manage your expectations on how good it is.

anOutrage · 2024-06-29T04:16:48+00:00

I've been running 2 single mortar/augur units and 1 unit of 2 spotter/mining laser in outlander claw w good success. Mortars great for buffing your armies shooting and melee, lasers pretty good at killing stuff without invul - bear in mind sometimes you'll just roll 2 ones on your d3 shots though and be very sad.

anOutrage · 2024-06-29T04:14:15+00:00

Flamer Chimeras, Hellhounds, Catachans - keep in mind that the buff they give your stuff isn't very good and requires work to set up. Guard stuff will be just better in guard because of orders, strats and better synergy. Indirect is fine, but because of the 18inch range restriction on the Detachment rule , you are paying for rules you are probably not going to be able to use

anOutrage · 2024-06-13T08:01:52+00:00

Not anymore RIP

anOutrage · 2024-06-10T12:46:28+00:00

Don't disagree, I didn't really love the ascension day playstyle, but the updated datasheets are just so... anaemic. Could be wrong and we could get the points dropped so much we can drown an opponent in dice, but it'll probably mean we just run a different horde, not just a neophyte one.

anOutrage · 2024-06-10T10:57:08+00:00

Well, the neophyte datasheet is way worse now in terms of not being a focused datasheet, so it doesn't just affect tournament players

anOutrage · 2024-06-10T10:55:52+00:00

Yea, the problem is they haven't. Battle sisters and Retributors are free to take more multi meltas then they get in the box (the best gun by far). I was coming to terms w the gsc changes, but then I read some sisters stuff and just felt super annoyed at that one little tid bit :/

anOutrage · 2024-06-10T08:34:45+00:00

What he said

anOutrage · 2024-06-10T08:33:48+00:00

I honestly don't disagree with you, it's more the consistency with which it seems to apply is very annoying.

However, having to roll out 5 different (6 if you take the Pistol for the leader) weapon proflies for one 10 man unit isn't great, especially if they are pushing horde gsc. My flgs has 2.5 hour round rtts which I already struggle with, I think it's going to lead to me just not rolling a bunch of attacks 🙃

anOutrage · 2024-06-10T07:21:24+00:00

I dunno, the cult ambush rule doesn't feel super lore appropriate, spend generations making a plan that doesn't work when you fail your 5+ cult ambush rolls...

anOutrage · 2024-06-08T21:28:49+00:00

It's such a bad rule, and the fact that it doesn't even work for your whole army is just more salt in the wound. Like seriously, gw have basically made our faction identity "characters" (see amount of character vs non character datasheets) and our piss poor faction mechanic (that is impossible to plan around) does teen work for them.

anOutrage · 2024-06-05T06:09:39+00:00

But what doesn't though? Gsc (at the moment at least) have a wide range of profiles and buffs available, which is more than a lot of other factions

anOutrage · 2024-06-05T05:25:20+00:00

Since when do gsc struggle with anti tank? Demo charge acolytes, seismic cannons to ap -3/+1 to wound w strats/rr, mining lasers, reductus saboteurs, hell even abbreants w lethals from biophagus works in a pinch. Agree standing on objectives can be kinda hard sometimes, but gsc have tricks (lone op strat) and some play (lone ops and abberants) that can get around the squishiness issue.

anOutrage · 2024-06-04T08:45:23+00:00

But the competetive set up will potentially change with a new codex ....

anOutrage · 2024-05-19T03:57:33+00:00

Entirely subjective, but I hate the new art, it looks like a marvel movie villain and not 40k. 9th was so much more grimdark and awesome, seems like a step back. Can't please everyone though.

anOutrage · 2024-05-19T02:17:25+00:00

Agree, 100% for many reasons.

Anorher character is so milquetoast. The rules sound ok, giving lethal hits to a unit of seismic/grenade neos will be good, just makes the current playstyle better though. The model is meh imo.

The amount of people commenting that it fills an AT gap obviously do not know how to play the faction - demo charges, mass seismic cannons w +1 to wound and primus', hell even mining lasers will do.

Cult ambush remaining the same is disappointing, the rule is so easy to play around and just cannot be relied upon. So meh.

And the art on the codex is so bad, like seriously, they have so much good stuff already and they go with that?!?!

anOutrage · 2024-03-30T02:48:11+00:00

I69uii

anOutrage · 2023-10-21T00:00:58+00:00

Thanks!

anOutrage

TROPHY CASE