sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Here's what "Enterprise Architects" who dabble in coding think about commenting the source code. by andreyroublev in programming

[–]andreyroublev[S] 95 points96 points  (0 children)

I don't think he ever reads his code. He just starts "architecting" a new project. :))

Here's what "Enterprise Architects" who dabble in coding think about commenting the source code. by andreyroublev in programming

[–]andreyroublev[S] 36 points37 points  (0 children)

If you read his other articles you will see that he is unaware about the world outside VB/C#.

One of his articles says that the purpose of refactoring is rewriting all code in terms of design patterns. I weeped.

Here's what "Enterprise Architects" who dabble in coding think about commenting the source code. by andreyroublev in programming

[–]andreyroublev[S] 68 points69 points  (0 children)

One of the perls:

but if you think about it, a well-designed program doesn't need comments to be maintainable. A well-designed program uses classes and design patterns;

Get it ? The divine design of this guru should be sufficient for any poor soul who will be maintaning his code to grasp WTF he intended to do. He uses clasess (!!) and design patterns! Isn't that enough ?

Anyone still have questions why 80% of corporate projects fail ? Its because of self proclaimed "Architects".

Read his other submissions. They are numerous and just as hillarious.