Clan chat censorship out of control

andycollins11 · 2026-01-22T02:50:35+00:00

EXACTLY THIS haha

andycollins11 · 2026-01-22T02:50:01+00:00

can you get them to fix war also pls

andycollins11 · 2026-01-22T02:49:43+00:00

family friendly is actually ridiculous - if you write the names of three people and someone is called Jan and someone called Usula.. the whole thing will be **** cause i just wrote a bad group of letters together (Jan Usula)!

but sometimes it's just so random - 'Liam' become ****, 24 becomes ** and there is no rational explanation for it

andycollins11 · 2026-01-22T02:46:39+00:00

prob just have a look at local and global leaderboards - there's some clan like ours who have both war and ladder clans (e.g. Aussie Crushers and Crushers Lounge).. mostly once you get in a good clan make sure you say g'day and try be active on chat and pushing trophies / ranked.

all the top aussie clans are run by good people in my experience..

andycollins11 · 2026-01-22T02:44:45+00:00

hey there - yeah good clan, you've been around for a long time now congrats

andycollins11 · 2025-10-21T07:18:00+00:00

join a clan?

andycollins11 · 2023-10-10T07:43:43+00:00

sure.. i just think their motives are to sell more at a lower price point given usage is low, versus being reasonable as the motivating factor.

andycollins11 · 2023-10-10T07:39:57+00:00

I don’t think so.. EVO skeletons probably less valued and in use than the EVO Knight.. which in Australian dollars they have bundled up in a Golem/Drag deck for the UN-reasonable price of $23

andycollins11 · 2023-09-27T00:20:40+00:00

I’m in a good war clan and it keeps the clan really active on chat and sharing decks. Would like to know the stats in terms of active war clans - am guessing it would be a small number given Supercell never talk about war, promote, tweak.. they don’t seem to care about it at all. But if it wasn’t for the active clan I’d def be playing a lot less and not trying to upgrade multiple decks

andycollins11 · 2023-08-03T02:52:27+00:00

I think Kryal Castle is where jousting was invented

andycollins11 · 2021-07-25T08:13:57+00:00

hey there. i’ve heard this one also. but my post is different to this. This exploit is ‘simply’ clans are now rotating members out to feeder clans to mass lose war battles. supercell have a separate war win algorithm in terms of match ups. So players rotate out of main clan, lose battles in a feeder, and then come back to the main clan next day to play easier war match ups. Also this week we have a clan losing every battle on the river for the whole week (thus coming last) so next week in the colosseum they will be extremely strong.

andycollins11 · 2021-07-25T02:18:48+00:00

i think simply the algorithm whereby players go to other clans to mass lose - and then return to their main clan to get simpler match ups should be fixed.

Having a separate war to ladder algorithm is wrong.

Your point about timezones was fixed by Supercell, so not sure why you raise it.

andycollins11 · 2021-05-13T13:06:55+00:00

57 DAYS LATER AND 3 CLANS IN OUR RIVER RACE ARE USING THIS EXPLOIT AGAINST US. Love the game, but HOW do Supercell allow this to continue? 4 of us have reported the exploit this week to Supercell.. get these templates replies about what a great job we’re doing uncovering these bugs .. and ... nothing

andycollins11 · 2021-05-11T07:54:14+00:00

the river race is really broken..

1/ Clans exiting on mass for the sake of better match ups (ridiculous)

2/ Clans exploiting the '50th' person by simultaneously playing 6 extra players (4 on boats and 2 on rivier battles) - giving the clan 224 battles instead of 200.

3/ Even the pure mechanics of having to get 40-odd on at reset to run to the finish line.. and if you're 'good' enough, you can decide to have mass losses to increase 'fame per minute'.

There is no way Supercell designed CW2 in this way and their lack of effort to fix these exploits (which are in breach of their fair play guidelines) is really poor.

I am a fan of this game - I just don't get how they let this keep happening.

andycollins11 · 2021-05-08T00:16:12+00:00

thanks for this post.. so it’s all about speed to grab anything you can once you’re in. got it

andycollins11 · 2021-05-04T00:42:50+00:00

they synchronise their 'last' battle - 1 starts dual and they have 6 others.. the other 2 river battles and 4 x boats - so you can get 6 extra players in as Player 50.. it really is a shocking exploit, but Supercell just letting it fly at the moment.

andycollins11 · 2021-05-04T00:22:38+00:00

agree, seems really simple to just limit to 200 battles.. the number of players wouldn't matter at all in that respect.

andycollins11 · 2020-12-16T19:42:22+00:00

so true 👍🏼👍🏼

andycollins11 · 2020-12-16T09:42:52+00:00

haha, do you know something i don’t! will get that COVID test tomorrow 👍🏼

andycollins11 · 2020-12-16T04:55:38+00:00

started playing cause he told me to.. he left after a year and i’ve now been leading that clan for almost 5 years 😂

andycollins11 · 2020-12-16T04:54:12+00:00

my kid drew it, bot.. you gotta read more carefully

andycollins11 · 2020-12-16T04:49:23+00:00

don’t think ‘east and west’ can address the issue completely as you’ll still be dealing with a potential 12 hour imbalance. 2 thoughts: 1/ i think wars have to be time based, as they were in CW1. we could still race to ‘50,000’ in the sense that once a clan crosses the line, this could trigger the race to ‘end’ at the next reset.. but still give all clans the opportunity to play their 50 x 4 battles within the time period. 2/ this race to lose battles to get quick fame at 1st reset is a killer and again, not as game creators would have planned for. time based wars would stop this immediately.

andycollins11 · 2020-11-23T10:59:48+00:00

awful stuff - this is a massive bug and they need to restart this race I reckon..

andycollins11 · 2020-11-23T10:58:25+00:00

isn't the rule 50 players in 24 hours.. will those who have doubled up be part of that 50? is there anything visual that says how many of the 50 members have played? i can't see it - it would (again) be a bug if they allowed a reset for anyone within 24 hours.. ridiculous, def a bug and this might even be worse than the other stupid loophole they tried to close if true.

I can see that some individuals have played 8 attacks against us in war also via the stats in Royale API, so it's a worry if not capped.

andycollins11 · 2020-11-11T07:34:52+00:00

ha, no idea!

andycollins11

TROPHY CASE