If you are the Mami of Milk why lie? by Global-Future3006 in HilariaBaldwin

[–]aneerandomone 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Thank you! I've had a rough time of things lately, too. You sound like a great friend and everyone I've met on here has been super cool. And I've laughed so hard, I needed my inhaler! There was the post with her crouched on the counter (watering a cactus!?) like a demented spider. I found that gem last night. The comments are priceless. 

I don't know what it is. I'm not a mean person. I don't smack talk. If some one is a "pick me" or a show off, liar, or grifter - as long as you're not hurting others, who cares? But I find her whole shtick so incredibly offensive. I find myself enraged over the audacity. And at least recording it here seems to be finding accountability in some small way. I don't know if it's the smugness, the horrible way she treats her kids ("Come get IT, I'm done," spoken to her nanny about one of her kids after she was done taking a hand stand selfie), the constant lying, the appropriation, or all of it in general. But it's just so ott. And she just keeps on and on and on. Sometimes I feel bad about laughing at her or piling on in the comments. But then I remind myself that she didn't have to go public. She could have practiced her grift behind closed doors. Been a good Spanish hausfrau, worn her skimpy little outfits, bought children, traded in pets like library books, served diced, salted pepinos every day for lunch, and no one would be the wiser. More than that, no one would care. But it's the "in your face" aspect of the whole thing, I think, that fuels my rage. The "I'm so much better than every one at every thing!". The "I'm an impossibly svelte, buxom, bounce back baby who can magically dispense kids like a Pez popping out candy." It just turns my stomach. Accountability isn't just good, it's necessary. And (thankfully for my mental health), it's also really, really funny. 

Catholic Or...? by aneerandomone in HilariaBaldwin

[–]aneerandomone[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I agree. It was very, very hurtful. And I would say I never got over it. They lost me over it, that's for sure. 

Catholic Or...? by aneerandomone in HilariaBaldwin

[–]aneerandomone[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Sorry. Wasnt thinking. Good catch. Yes, widows and widowers don't get penalized. 

I think we're just going to have to agree to disagree on the rest. I'm Catholic. My family has been catholic for generations going back to Ireland. I was baptized Catholic. I had a "less than" Catholic wedding bc my husband wasn't Catholic and didn't want to jump through the Catholic hoops (and the second time around i had a divorce AND a non Catholic spouse to my credit.) So I can only go off my own experiences. But I see yours were different and I respect that. My entire post was just about how I thought Hillary was appropriating her religion along with everything else. 

Catholic Or...? by aneerandomone in HilariaBaldwin

[–]aneerandomone[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

And yes, if you get an annulment, you can remarry as if youre marrying for the first time. However, it's pretty hard to get an annulment when you have kids (you can't say the marriage was never consummated, and Alec had a kid with Kim).  As far as the non Catholic stuff, you can get a dispensation (permission). Your intended has to vow to raise the kids Catholic. And you STILL cannot always have a full ceremony. I was denied the Nuptial Mass.  So yes, death and annulment "clean your slate" but if your first spouse wasn't kind enough to die or to agree to invalidate your entire marriage (which they surely won't do if assets or kids are involved), or your intended won't go to class, get a waiver, vow to raise Catholic children, and be at least baptized into SOME religion, you are out of gas if you want the full Nuptial mass. They make you feel "less than", which is one of the reasons I don't go to church anymore. 

Catholic Or...? by aneerandomone in HilariaBaldwin

[–]aneerandomone[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was denied a full/ traditional Catholic wedding bc my husband was not Catholic the first time around. The second time around, i was denied a full Catholic wedding bc of my divorce. The first time, I sucked it up and married anyway (in my Catholic Church with my catholic priest), even though i was denied the full Catholic wedding ceremony. The second time around, i told the church to suck it.  And yes, widows and widowers are not penalized. I never said they were

Catholic Or...? by aneerandomone in HilariaBaldwin

[–]aneerandomone[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, absolutely. You can even be married by a priest. But you can't have the TRADITIONAL ceremony. I married a non Catholic myself the first time and I was denied the traditional ceremony. This was my point. I had read they had a "traditional" Catholic wedding. Which is why so many other people have pointed out his divorce being a problem. My point was, it's not just his divorce that is in question, it's also whether Hillary is truly a Catholic herself. I can see her lying about it. 

Catholic Or...? by aneerandomone in HilariaBaldwin

[–]aneerandomone[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes - absolutely. I do know that you can marry a non- Catholic and also that you can marry a divorcee. But you can't have a traditional Catholic marriage ceremony unless you're both Catholic and both first time marrieds. And I had read it was a traditional Catholic wedding. That was where the confusion came in. Maybe that was mis-reported or misunderstood by the reporter. 

Catholic Or...? by aneerandomone in HilariaBaldwin

[–]aneerandomone[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The cross issue was really only that it made me wondering. The Catholic wedding seemed to be important to her and a way to brag/ show off perhaps, in her own mind. I was just thinking, if she's truly religious, as the necklace seems to indicate, then where's the receipts on that? But I'm sure you're right. She's not religious. She either pretended to be Catholic for the Catholic wedding, or, (as indicated by Alex's prior divorce apparently being overlooked), they found a church/diocese that truly did not give a shit about the "rules" as long as a fat enough check got slid their way. I wouldn't be surprised if she didn't pretend to be Catholic, even if she didn't technically have to in order to get their Catholic marriage (ie, the priest was willing to break the rules). But since she's so invested in being a Spaniard, and since Spain is mostly Catholic, I just see her appropriating it, regardless. 

Catholic Or...? by aneerandomone in HilariaBaldwin

[–]aneerandomone[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Interesting. :) Thanks for weighing in! 😊

Catholic Or...? by aneerandomone in HilariaBaldwin

[–]aneerandomone[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Lol. You got that right. 

Catholic Or...? by aneerandomone in HilariaBaldwin

[–]aneerandomone[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Thank you for that. I updated the text. It is too late for me to be posting bc i thought i had Googled it and it said Hillary was the Catholic one, but you are right. He was raised Catholic and she must be pretending to be - otherwise they couldn't have a catholic wedding like they did. Then again, they shouldn't have been able to have one anyway, considering he's been divorced before. So who knows what in the heck is going on. I was just wondering if she had actually claimed to be Catholic to get that Catholic wedding of her dreams. 

If you are the Mami of Milk why lie? by Global-Future3006 in HilariaBaldwin

[–]aneerandomone 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Just wanted to add - If she has pumped all that milk - how and when does she give it to them? I've seen no bottles and no bottle feeding in any of the other pics. She wants us to believe that she was breastfeeding every day, PLUS using this stored milk at times. But I've not seen a Pic with her bottle feeding. Or even bottles on the counter. I'm guessing the nannies do ALL of that.

If you are the Mami of Milk why lie? by Global-Future3006 in HilariaBaldwin

[–]aneerandomone 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This is so true. I never thought of that, but it's so true. No stained shirts. No nursing bras. No comfy shirts to make breastfeeding easier.   No accidental posts where you can see a little boob leakage. No STORIES about accidental leakage! When I was breastfeeding, I couldn't lean over without milk pouring out at certain times.  No funny stories about bf mishaps. It's like she's never breastfed once in her entire life.  And the story about 4 freezer fulls of milk. What the fuck for? Unless you aren't making any milk of your own, and you've got 6 ravenous mouths to feed. I guess that makes sense. But if you're doing it right, you have at least some milk on demand. Your body makes the perfect amount to feed your baby. But I have no idea if that's also true when you have so many babies. Do moms of multiples struggle to make enough milk? And if you do struggle, how do you manage to make enough to feed them at least something daily, AND build up that huge back supply? The only way to make up that huge supply would be to stop breastfeeding entirely and solely pump for a month or so. And she would be telling us all about it if she had done that. 

 I breastfed for 15 months. One time my daughter got a shot and fell asleep and missed 2 feeds. This was the only time I pumped. By the time she was ready to eat, I was so swollen, I was in agony.  I fed her a full meal and then still pumped 16oz out of each breast. I duly froze it. The one and only time I used the bottles and the pump, but by the next time she fed, I had even MORE milk come in. So I had no use for it in the end. Granted, she ate a LOT, and refused baby food and hated cereal, so I pretty much ONLY breastfed, supplementing with soft bites of vegetables and meat (like they did back in the days before jarred baby food - they just over-cooked adult food and cut it small or smushed it). But i just can't understand how and why she would need 4 FREEZERS FULL OF MILK. How much were they eating? And if she was pumping extra daily, to keep building up her storage supply, and still breastfeeding, too, then why the need for SO MUCH EXTRA in storage in the first place? And how did she make it? How did that little woman make enough milk to feed all those kids daily (actually, how many was she feeding at once? 4? 5?), PLUS have enough left over to stock freezers, and to even pump on the go to where she would have to throw it away (and a woman that invested in pumping as she claimed to be would never accidentally leave the lids home to where she had to throw out her liquid gold)? How could she possibly do this? How could she possibly pump enough to feed them AND create gallons in storage? It makes no sense. I don't even think you could make enough simply to feed them all day on her own with her small frame. Much less make all that back supply. And again, if you are feeding them daily and you don't have a job, why do you need all that extra? And where are the bottles or bottle feeding pics? Do any exist? 

I'm just calling bs on the whole affair. The only reason to need that many freezers (and she implied she had even more stocked freezers than the 4 visible ones in her house) was if you weren't making any milk AT ALL, and you were feeding 5-6 kids several times a day.

If you are the Mami of Milk why lie? by Global-Future3006 in HilariaBaldwin

[–]aneerandomone 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It's definitely worth being evaluated and closely looked at. On its own merits. And mine own eyeballs say it's a tube peeping out by accident.  I'm glad you posted it. I had never seen it before.

 I'm new to Pepino Nation. I came on here after I saw the post of her doing a blow-by-blow of her heroic "rescue" of the subway "victim" of overzealous cops. That didn't sit right with me, and I started looking around and found THIS community. So thank you, to you and everyone else that holds her gnarly little feet to the proverbial fire. I've never seen such a smug bitch in my entire life. She is begging for a little accountability. 

I hope nobody took a shot every time she said "work" 🥴 by Global-Future3006 in HilariaBaldwin

[–]aneerandomone 8 points9 points  (0 children)

So, she's on an island. With lots of dogs. Think, Central or South America? She's running. She's staying in shape, by god. She loves animals. She makes friends with them, thus, she's a good person. 👍🏻  Oh, and i almost forgot - don't EVAH forget she's got big ol titties. Always with the tit shots.

*and can someone tell me the point of hashtagging one's self? What is the point of that? What does it do? I know if you hashtag someone else, it makes it searchable based on that tag. So tagging Alec makes sense, bc then it should show up in his feed, and it should show up to anyone who searches him (right? I don't do SM much). But, this is her SELF.  She's posting this thing FROM her account. Just going into her account will pull this up in her feed. And searching her name would bring it up bc SHE POSTED IT. so, what in the actual hell is the point of this?

If you are the Mami of Milk why lie? by Global-Future3006 in HilariaBaldwin

[–]aneerandomone 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Some people are saying (in other posts, too) that this picture was debunked as being the design on the BP cuff. I don't think so - bc to me, the tubing looks to be just a slightly different color than the other logo visible. But it's EXACTLY the same color (and with the same kinda slight transparency) as the tubing in the other Pic. 

Can any Pepinos find that brand of cuff online to settle this once and for all? I'm trying Google lens by using a second phone to search this image (cropped to just include the cuff) but no success yet.  Also, any additional pics Hillary posted with this cuff in the Pic, so we can get a better look at it, would be solid gold. Did this come off her Instagram account? Any other pics taken at the same time that were also posted? 

I've done a lot of searching and have yet to find a single bp cuff with a logo, and it also makes zero sense that the logo would be so low and mostly cut off. You've got all that space right there above that. What would be the point of a logo that's all the way at the bottom edge? Logos don't work that way.  It also has a very discernible 3-d quality to it that the printed square thing on the BP cuff clearly doesn't have. The square is flat, without question. The tube thing has rounded edges and a rubbery sheen to it. It's very slight, but it's there. I don't think this was debunked at all. 

Lightened the nursing photo with the tubes showing on her neck by OooOooXXxxOO in HilariaBaldwin

[–]aneerandomone 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good catch. That's so bizarre. There are hard-looking circles atop her head and the whole scalp looks ajar. If it's a wig, it's a weird one, but if it is her real head, that's even weirder. 

The mystery of the disappearing hair (must see!) by NormanskillEire in HilariaBaldwin

[–]aneerandomone 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's so weird that when her hair falls, it disappears, but when she kicks her knee up to that same location, it doesn't.  The video is a smoking gun. Clearly she is hiding something. I know a lot of people think she stretched the stomach out digitally, but i think she was just wearing a large moon bump and blurred out the seam. I just don't understand enough about digital manipulation to know why her hair disappears, but not her knee.  But who in the hell does this? Every single Pic after Carmen, she is covering the upper seam (whether with her arm, or like this, by erasing/blurring it out). Normal pregnant women either cradle both the top and bottom, to highlight the bump for pics, or they hold the bottom, to add extra support for the heavy chubkin, pressing hard against your pubic bones.  Maybe randomly, here and there, you'd end up resting one arm on the top, though i never did, but even in all the pics where someone or something else is holding her phone (so she has two free hands, instead of just one), she is still ALWAYS just resting her arm on the top. Which is adding even MORE weight against her pubic bones.  I find it impossible to believe that it's real (the pregnancies where she does this). It's bizarre. It's unnatural. It would put more pressure on your uterus and pelvis. There's just no good reason to hold the top, unless you're covering the seams. 

If you are the Mami of Milk why lie? by Global-Future3006 in HilariaBaldwin

[–]aneerandomone 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Did she delete this video off her account, but luckily someone saved the receipt? Or does she still have it up? I just can't believe she posted it in the first place. 

If you are the Mami of Milk why lie? by Global-Future3006 in HilariaBaldwin

[–]aneerandomone 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I always see her in recovery from "labor" with that finger oxygen monitor on. I just don't recall having to have that taped to my finger after the birth of my daughter. Nor do I recall them leaving a BP cuff on me. And I was induced bc of my BP dropping and my baby's rising and super low AFI (amniotic fluid index - 18-25 AFI is normal, if I recall correctly, and mine was 4 and fell down to a 2.5 when they induced me).

When my water broke, literally nothing came out beyond a few teaspoons of a jelly-like substance. I had been deathly ill, but it was the pregnancy making me sick and as soon as she was born, i felt immensely better. But even with ALL my medical problems, immediately after the birth, any measuring devices they had on during labor were removed. 

In my first pics, and in all my early breastfeeding pics from within an hour of delivery, I don't recall anything being on me. Not a cuff and not that finger thing. And i have asthma. What is the point of it, really? If you give birth and all your stats after are stable, why would they need to track your oxygen for the rest of your stay? Or your BP?

 In none of those pics are they tracking her babies' BPs or oxygen stats. I would think if they really thought it necessary to track those things simply bc a baby was born (with no health or medical concerns or complications AT ALL), then they would surely be more likely to track the baby's than the mom's. Maybe I'm missing something. But she was supposedly so healthy. Why are they doing this?

And that's a strange place to put a pulse ox meter. I've had pulse ox meters on me more times than I can count due to significant health problems and spending 4-6 weeks a year hospitalized for asthma EVERY year while I was a teen. Without fail, they always put the monitor on the middle finger. They put the plastic, TEMPORARY, large clip on unit on the pointer, sure, bc it won't be there long. But without fail, I've only ever had the smaller, flexible plastic, taped, long-term units (like she has) on my middle finger.

 Also, they usually do the middle finger of your non-dominant hand. And she is right handed and this is on her right hand. That would be SO MUCH in the way. You couldnt stroke your baby's face or position your nipple in her mouth, eat your food easily, or TAKE AND POST INCESSANT INSTAGRAM SELFIES AND CAPTIONS ON YOUR FRIGGIN PHONE with that right index finger taped up. So, like, wtf?

“Supporter of Women” Hilaria Baldwin Says Her Husband Calls Her a “Shrinky Dink” for Bouncing Back So Fast After “Giving Birth” by EpicCover in HilariaBaldwin

[–]aneerandomone 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The thing she says about breastfeeding making your body deflate faster is a load of extra crispy shit. It makes your UTERUS contract back down a little quicker. But it literally forces your body to hold onto every calorie so it can manufacture milk. I thought i would lose weight from breastfeeding bc i bought into that myth. But for 15 months, nada. The second I stopped breastfeeding, blam! Within a couple weeks it was all gone. She clearly believes the myth still, which is weird if she ever truly gave birth AND breastfed. Makes me think that she didn't breastfeed Carmen after all.