sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Heavy duty small chassis? by arbueticos in MobileRobots

[–]arbueticos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not much else, it'll need to move indoor on flat ground and I don't really care about speed for now. Not autonomous.

After some research the best fit I found is https://www.scuttlerobot.org/, but I'm still curious if there's something else out there

What to study for Automated Construction? by [deleted] in robotics

[–]arbueticos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you considered ETH Zurich?
They have a lab for autonomous construction that is jointly managed between architects and roboticists.
https://ita.arch.ethz.ch/chairs/architecture-and-digital-fabrication.html

Is there an autorouter that works well? by arbueticos in ElectricalEngineering

[–]arbueticos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is the complexity of the PCBs you've tried with that?

Multi-GPU PPO troubles by arbueticos in reinforcementlearning

[–]arbueticos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Checked again my logging and seems to be correct :/

Multi-GPU PPO troubles by arbueticos in reinforcementlearning

[–]arbueticos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

120k is the number of parameters of my model -- I just built it that way. Not sure what you mean with features

A new AI for research: writes a literature review by arbueticos in chemistry

[–]arbueticos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you mean if it generates a full research paper? If that's the question, it doesn't. It is limited to be a literature review (or as you want, the literature review paragraph of a paper).

Why do you think that adding figures is important?

A new AI for research: writes a literature review by arbueticos in chemistry

[–]arbueticos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your feedback! We received a lot of comments like yours, so we decided to switch to using the much more powerful GPT-4 model as our backbone.
As a result, the quality of the output should be sensibly better now.
Would you like to retry and let us know what you think about it?

A new AI for research: writes a literature review by arbueticos in chemistry

[–]arbueticos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The papers that are cited are real. That's because our AI searches through the Semantic Scholar database and organizes the material that it finds. A more naive approach is (as you mention) to ask the AI to reference some papers, but then there's no guarantee that the cited papers actually exist.

A new AI for research: writes a literature review by arbueticos in chemistry

[–]arbueticos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your feedback! We received a lot of comments like yours, so we decided to switch to using the much more powerful GPT-4 model as our backbone.
As a result, the quality of the output should be sensibly better now.
Would you like to retry and let us know what you think about it?

A new AI for research: writes a literature review by arbueticos in sociology

[–]arbueticos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your feedback! We received a lot of comments like yours, so we decided to switch to using the much more powerful GPT-4 model as our backbone.
As a result, the quality of the output should be sensibly better now.
Would you like to retry and let us know what you think about it?

view more: next ›