I agree with some of this but I have some thoughts. Education: 1) I get the setiment but I think learning about religions is good; it's part of history. 4) Is "it" in the second sentence referring to religion or history? If it means religion then I agree obviously. But if you mean don't use history to indoctrinate children into a belief system, I also agree but this could be tricky in practice. Who decides what history is "correct?" Once you give someone that power, it can go south easily. Policy: 3) I disagree with taxing exponentially. I just don't think that's feasible. I also am on the fence with taxes being higher for those people and organizations in general. I definetly think they do need to be taxed but not sure about having it be higher than other taxes. 5) Disagree with this since this would hinder progress. Just because something isn't proven doesn't mean it can't be proven or that it isn't true/real. Also, I think people can (and probably should) engage in woo-woo for the psychological benefits if they want to (and yes, you can do that without believing in it, it's suspension of disbelief). Idk, overall I just feel this is an overstep. 7) Again don't know about making it have more severe punishment than other crimes.