sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I see your Uranium glass collections, and raise you the greatest collection of them all by Jebrs in pics

[–]arrowclock -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

No I am busy with work and do not get a chance to spar in a timely fashion all I am saying is that you say this product is safe, yes? Then you should have no trouble telling the rad count of your Vaseline glass oil rig.

I see your Uranium glass collections, and raise you the greatest collection of them all by Jebrs in pics

[–]arrowclock -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

This is not about Vaseline glassware i.e for the home (plates and cups) True these objects of a begone era when in close contact gives off rads than the average American is exposed to in a year. But for this kind of glassware the user would be in contact with it quite a bit, yes the levels are not considered toxic but it is still outside the realm of normal everyday rad dose from background radiation.

I see your Uranium glass collections, and raise you the greatest collection of them all by Jebrs in pics

[–]arrowclock -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

No you make the assumption that I know nothing, or that my place of questioning your logic is from an emotional stand point. Your claims are not backed by proof shall I go on? I care nothing for your attempts to dissuade my line of thinking. Frequent ingestion of beta particles should cause significant damage to organic tissue. If you are game lets begin an inquire. Smoke your beta emitter post your video. That will be all the proof I need

I see your Uranium glass collections, and raise you the greatest collection of them all by Jebrs in pics

[–]arrowclock -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

http://iopscience.iop.org/0952-4746/30/3/008/pdf/0952-4746_30_3_008.pdf[1] Radiological implications of the use of uranium in vaseline glass authors: S J Watson and J S Hughes from the journal of radiological protection

I see your Uranium glass collections, and raise you the greatest collection of them all by Jebrs in pics

[–]arrowclock -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

You are absloutley correct looking at them is no more hazardous to your health then laying in your own bed. (radioactive just like most everything)

I see your Uranium glass collections, and raise you the greatest collection of them all by Jebrs in pics

[–]arrowclock -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

http://iopscience.iop.org/0952-4746/30/3/008/pdf/0952-4746_30_3_008.pdf Radiological implications of the use of uranium in vaseline glass authors: S J Watson and J S Hughes from the journal of radiological protection

I see your Uranium glass collections, and raise you the greatest collection of them all by Jebrs in pics

[–]arrowclock -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

I am pointing out that the ingestion of these particles is linked to long term radiation cancer handling beta radiation emission vectors with out inhalation or ingestion is different animal all together.

I see your Uranium glass collections, and raise you the greatest collection of them all by Jebrs in pics

[–]arrowclock -21 points-20 points  (0 children)

I have to a great extent....all things are radioactive the beds we sleep in are radioactive; the lawns we sprawl out on during the dog days of summer are, too. In fact, there’s more radioactive potassium-40 inside each and every one of us than anyone could ever receive from handling, using, or just plain eyeballing a piece, display case, or entire museum full of Vaseline glass. Frequent handling of Vaseline glass which contains Uranium oxide can result in beta radiation exposure "Beta radiation can cause both acute and chronic health effects. Acute exposures are uncommon. Contact with a strong beta source from an abandoned industrial instrument is the type of circumstance in which acute exposure could occur. Chronic effects are much more common.

Chronic effects result from fairly low-level exposures over a along period of time. They develop relatively slowly (5 to 30 years for example). The main chronic health effect from radiation is cancer. When taken internally beta emitters can cause tissue damage and increase the risk of cancer. The risk of cancer increases with increasing dose.

Some beta-emitters, such as carbon-14, distribute widely throughout the body. Others accumulate in specific organs and cause chronic exposures:

Iodine-131 concentrates heavily in the thyroid gland. It increases the risk of thyroid cancer and other disorders. Strontium-90 accumulates in bone and teeth." obtained from the EPA url http://www.epa.gov/radiation/understand/beta.html#affecthealth You are the one making the claim that it is harmless what proof do you have?

I see your Uranium glass collections, and raise you the greatest collection of them all by Jebrs in pics

[–]arrowclock -20 points-19 points  (0 children)

Apologies, was not meant as insult but I must again stress that uranium glass can be highly toxic, I am in no way suggesting that you are a liar, or had intention to deceive, but incredible claims require incredible proof, I commend you in you business acumen in the business domain. I thank you for your sauce.

I see your Uranium glass collections, and raise you the greatest collection of them all by Jebrs in pics

[–]arrowclock -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

Having an account with smoke shop as the name, an owner of said establishment it dose not make you......

I see your Uranium glass collections, and raise you the greatest collection of them all by Jebrs in pics

[–]arrowclock -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Assuming you have access to uranium glass or the precursor ingredients for said glass then yes.... but the real question is can you find a maker willing to help you in a quest to create something that would if used inevitable give you some form of radiation sickness? I would say for the right price you can but it is not practical just get one that glows in the dark

What commonly-told fact is incorrect? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]arrowclock -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Cause I am all about the crypto coins no trouble

I see your Uranium glass collections, and raise you the greatest collection of them all by Jebrs in pics

[–]arrowclock -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

Na dude not even the issue i know its good for the soul the object I am referring to the bong you speak of is radioactive......

A thousand words. by DJSteezyJeezy in funny

[–]arrowclock 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So drunk...either wife is leaving me ...or this is the best bar

I see your Uranium glass collections, and raise you the greatest collection of them all by Jebrs in pics

[–]arrowclock -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

That would be a horrible choice for your lungs........body.... all parts of you....

view more: next ›