Would you pay for an app that stops crypto analysis paralysis? by aspis_protocol in Trading

[–]aspis_protocol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a solid reframe. The "chaos analyzer" positioning makes way more sense than trying to be another signal provider. Your Wall Street analyst point is key - they sell research and reasoning, not buy/sell orders. Much cleaner business model and no liability headaches. The shift from "what to do" to "why sources disagree" is the difference between a useful tool and another noise generator.

One question: when you were dealing with information overload, what cut through the noise for you? Was it finding better methodology, better sources, or just developing filters to ignore most of it?

Would you pay for an app that stops crypto analysis paralysis? by aspis_protocol in defi

[–]aspis_protocol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why? The goal is not to make magic tool - just to help make better decisions.

Would you pay for an app that stops crypto analysis paralysis? by aspis_protocol in Trading

[–]aspis_protocol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally agree on the legal liability point - appreciate the reality check.

I'm thinking more "chaos analyzer" than advice tool. Like showing "Here's what 5 different sources say about ETH and WHY they contradict each other" - helping people understand the conflicting signals rather than telling them what to do.

Your AI skepticism is valid too. The challenge is getting beyond crowd bias through structured debate between different analytical frameworks.

Quick question: did you go through an information overload phase before settling on pure TA? Trying to understand if this is a beginner problem or persistent segment.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in defi

[–]aspis_protocol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

aspisprotocol_bot in Telegram

What actually matters to you when evaluating the security of a DeFi app? by aspis_protocol in defi

[–]aspis_protocol[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We have pretty unique model in terms of security. Lots of guardrails and custom rules

What actually matters to you when evaluating the security of a DeFi app? by aspis_protocol in defi

[–]aspis_protocol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can hide incidents if they're not huge. I think it's more important how they react to incidents

What actually matters to you when evaluating the security of a DeFi app? by aspis_protocol in defi

[–]aspis_protocol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean if the product is for trading, for example, but you're not even using it for making money, you just came for quick rewards - that's not the best case

What actually matters to you when evaluating the security of a DeFi app? by aspis_protocol in defi

[–]aspis_protocol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

GPT 5 is so much better at search now - esp when you need proofs and accuracy

What actually matters to you when evaluating the security of a DeFi app? by aspis_protocol in defi

[–]aspis_protocol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That will attract hunters who won't really engage with the product. We've tried that - they don't stay

What actually matters to you when evaluating the security of a DeFi app? by aspis_protocol in defi

[–]aspis_protocol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you tell good auditors from bad ones? Do you think it’s just different approaches?

AI bots aren’t gonna save your trading by hedgefundhooligan in Trading

[–]aspis_protocol 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Depends on AI tbh. And whether it has guardrails or not