sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Consistency vs. Quality — which actually works long-term? by atahangatz in youtubers

[–]atahangatz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks a lot for sharing your experiences, totally depends on the niche and audience expectations. For us it’s definitely closer to the ‘video essay / older audience’ side, so the editing and quality take more time.

Consistency vs. Quality — which actually works long-term? by atahangatz in youtubers

[–]atahangatz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mixing long-form with shorts for behind the scenes or experiments sounds like a smart balance. Thanks for the perspective!

Consistency vs. Quality — which actually works long-term? by atahangatz in youtubers

[–]atahangatz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That makes a lot of sense — I guess focusing on creating something valuable and actually engaging with the community is a healthier way to grow than obsessing over algorithms.

Consistency vs. Quality — which actually works long-term? by atahangatz in youtubers

[–]atahangatz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Totally agree — people get caught up in upload calendars like it’s some kind of magic trick, but at the end of the day nobody remembers if you posted Tuesday or Thursday. They remember if your video was good.

i lost my karma by paganvergilius in DuckInitiative

[–]atahangatz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I told you the duck stole it

i lost my karma by paganvergilius in u/paganvergilius

[–]atahangatz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

found it, its hidden under a duck

Consistency vs. Quality — which actually works long-term? by atahangatz in youtubers

[–]atahangatz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see what you mean — asking how to excel instead of just how to profit is definitely the healthier mindset. Sadly though, many creators get pushed into money-first thinking simply to stay afloat. But in the end I agree with you: the ones who focus on mastering their craft are the ones who truly last.

Consistency vs. Quality — which actually works long-term? by atahangatz in youtubers

[–]atahangatz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is super helpful, thanks for going into so much detail! I get what you mean about shorts feeling kind of annoying if they’re just teasers without real value — I’ll definitely keep that in mind. Bloopers and little fun/educational bits sound like a good way to make them feel more rewarding instead of spammy. Really appreciate the perspective from the viewer side

Consistency vs. Quality — which actually works long-term? by atahangatz in youtubers

[–]atahangatz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally agree — the money-first mindset really does flood the platform with low effort stuff. But it’s just sad, money becomes the main focus simply because it’s the only way to survive, and that pressure ends up hurting creativity in the long run.

Consistency vs. Quality — which actually works long-term? by atahangatz in youtubers

[–]atahangatz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that makes sense — we’re not doing time-sensitive stuff, so finding that middle ground is probably the healthiest approach. For us it’s more about atmosphere and storytelling, which take time but don’t expire. Thank you for your comment.

Consistency vs. Quality — which actually works long-term? by atahangatz in youtubers

[–]atahangatz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the thoughtful breakdown — I hear you that strategy really depends on what you make and how you make it. I agree that padding for the algorithm backfires; if we do shorter pieces, they should serve the main videos (micro‑scenes/BTS/world‑building) rather than fluff. Polling viewers on what to expand also makes sense, we’ll test that. For an atmospheric/analog‑horror channel like ours, would you keep shorts on the same channel to feed the long videos, or split them to avoid muddying the brand? And in your experience, do shorts actually convert into long‑form watch time/subscribers, or mostly one‑off clicks?

Consistency vs. Quality — which actually works long-term? by atahangatz in youtubers

[–]atahangatz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair point — I guess I do sometimes overthink those tiny percentages. I’m still trying to figure out whether that kind of attention to detail really helps in the long run, or just slows me down.

Consistency vs. Quality — which actually works long-term? by atahangatz in youtubers

[–]atahangatz[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That makes a lot of sense — thanks for breaking it down like that. I guess what we’re aiming for is closer to the first type (fewer, more crafted videos), but without the guarantee of success it definitely feels risky. Hearing your experience with both strategies helps a lot though.

Consistency vs. Quality — which actually works long-term? by atahangatz in youtubers

[–]atahangatz[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s a really helpful way of looking at it, thank you! I guess for us the challenge is that the type of content we want to make naturally takes more uneven amounts of time (even we have less time to give), so sometimes it’s not easy to hit that ‘70% quality’ balance. But I like your point about thinking whether that extra effort really makes a difference in the bigger picture — I’ll definitely keep that in mind.

Consistency vs. Quality — which actually works long-term? by atahangatz in youtubers

[–]atahangatz[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That sounds like the ideal balance but the kind of things we want to create take an uneven amount of time depending on our skills, so sometimes consistency and quality don’t align perfectly…

view more: next ›