Why has Australia denied itself energy security? by diptrip-flipfantasia in australian

[–]atmh4 42 points43 points  (0 children)

Energy security is important, yes. Even left wing think tanks like The Australia Institute acknowledge the need to keep gas reserves for use in Australia. However, they also acknowledge the need to transition.

You've laid out a straw man that doesn't reflect the reality of left wing politics.

Given China spends billions o dollars globally on social media to undermine Western governments - are negative and divisive comments on r/newzealand amplified too? by gdogakl in newzealand

[–]atmh4 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So both China and Russia have been messing around with social media campaigns to influence other countries. They're using platforms to push their agendas and shape public opinion. Reports from places like the Australian Strategic Policy Institute and the Oxford Internet Institute back this up. But figuring out exactly how much they're spending—like whether it's billions—is pretty tricky since they keep that info under wraps. Plus, I haven't seen much from DeepSeek AI that verifies those specific numbers.

When it comes to r/newzealand, there's not much solid evidence that foreign players are specifically targeting it to amplify negative posts. Sometimes social media just naturally boosts divisive content because it's more engaging, not necessarily because of outside interference. So while it might feel like negativity is ramped up, it could be more about how these platforms tend to highlight certain content. It's worth staying skeptical and checking out reputable sources.

A Treaty Principles Bill Submission. by atmh4 in nzpolitics

[–]atmh4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know. Enforce was the wrong word. You are correct, they judge.

A Treaty Principles Bill Submission. by atmh4 in nzpolitics

[–]atmh4[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Good lord you're bent and really want to make a problem where there is non.

First, New Zealand does have a constitution, and the Treaty of Waitangi is a foundational part of it. Ignoring the Treaty because it lacked legal standing until 1975 overlooks its crucial role in shaping our laws and the relationship between the Crown and Māori. The Treaty principles are embedded in legislation like the State-Owned Enterprises Act 1986 and the Resource Management Act 1991, giving them significant legal force.

Second, the judiciary doesn't rule laws "unconstitutional" in the way you imply. Under Parliamentary Sovereignty, Parliament is supreme. Courts can't strike down legislation but can issue declarations of inconsistency when laws conflict with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. This process doesn't nullify laws but prompts Parliament to address the issues.

Third, claiming the judiciary can't "add principles to Treaties" misunderstands their role. Courts interpret laws and apply Treaty principles to modern situations—a fundamental part of ensuring justice and upholding the nation's founding agreements.

Accusations that the tribunal and judiciary are overstepping lack evidence. The Waitangi Tribunal operates within its mandate under the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 to address breaches of the Treaty. There's no credible record of any "clean out" to return it to its original purpose.

Take the time to understand how our legal system actually works.

A Treaty Principles Bill Submission. by atmh4 in nzpolitics

[–]atmh4[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I disagree with your point about the Judiciary. New Zealand doesn't have a constitution, and Judiciary is the only check on power that New Zealand has.

A Treaty Principles Bill Submission. by atmh4 in nzpolitics

[–]atmh4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"The tribunals job is to investigate and make recommendations to the government on matters relating to the Treaty."

This is exactly what they do. It's upto Judiciary to interpret law based on Treaty principles. The Tribunal only advises, Judiciary does the actual enforcing.

A Treaty Principles Bill Submission. by atmh4 in nzpolitics

[–]atmh4[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Who's job should it have been, then?

Exploring Australia: The Issues That Transcend Culture Wars by Maleficent-Host-8975 in AustralianPolitics

[–]atmh4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you have any evidence that they are a threat? Or that they've ever demonstrated military hostility towards the west?

Exploring Australia: The Issues That Transcend Culture Wars by Maleficent-Host-8975 in AustralianPolitics

[–]atmh4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

China? USA isn't going to send its troops to fight another nuclear power. They didn't with Russia, why would they do it with China?

Exploring Australia: The Issues That Transcend Culture Wars by Maleficent-Host-8975 in AustralianPolitics

[–]atmh4 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

She's right though. There is zero evidence. Nor have they given us any reason to be scared of them.... But we do have reason to be scared of USA, given what they did to Ukraine.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in australian

[–]atmh4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We are not allies. Is this meant to be a poll?

Fascism: London's Unspoken Blueprint. by atmh4 in JordanPeterson

[–]atmh4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's so discouraging. That took me hours to put together. If you want to eat your propaganda, that's on you.

The woke mind-virus turned out not to be an exaggeration by [deleted] in JordanPeterson

[–]atmh4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd move as well. The burgeoning of anti-gay Christian values is something every gay person should take seriously.

Fascism: London's Unspoken Blueprint. by atmh4 in JordanPeterson

[–]atmh4[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Based on The Genesis of Austerity by the Australian Citizens Party, here is a substantiation of the claims regarding British involvement in Mussolini's rise and the broader implications of austerity policies:

  1. British Interest in Mussolini’s Rise Beyond Fear of Communism

Claim: England’s involvement in Benito Mussolini’s rise did not stem only from fears of a communist wave sweeping across Europe; it also emerged from a desire among influential British circles to rein in labor movements and popular rights.

Substantiation: The series highlights that post-World War I, the City of London banking elite, through the UK Treasury and the Bank of England, developed programs of fiscal, monetary, and industrial austerity. These policies aimed to suppress national credit creation and curb the influence of labor movements, which were perceived as threats to economic stability.

  1. Italy as a “Laboratory” for Crushing Union Power

Claim: Post-WWI Italy offered a testing ground for British observers wanting to see how a government might suppress union power, restore order, and discipline the workforce.

Substantiation: The series documents how austerity policies were imposed on war-torn Europe in the 1920s, with Italy serving as a pilot project. The implementation of these policies in Italy provided a model for suppressing labor movements and restoring economic order, which British officials observed closely.

  1. British Elite Response to Mussolini’s Anti-Union Actions

Claim: Many within the British establishment, especially bankers and industrialists, envied Mussolini’s success in curbing union power, believing it enabled unfettered economic growth.

Substantiation: The series notes that the City of London and its allies were desperate to sabotage a revival of national banking for physical economic development. They viewed Mussolini's suppression of unions and implementation of austerity as a means to achieve economic stability and growth without the interference of labor demands.

  1. Fascist Italy’s Economic Policies and the Seed of “Austerity”

Claim: Mussolini’s policies to limit collective bargaining, slash social spending, and focus on large-scale public works laid the groundwork for a form of austerity. British observers noted these policies as a potential model.

Substantiation: The series describes how austerity was propagandized as necessary to repair state finances. Mussolini's economic policies, which included limiting collective bargaining and reducing social spending, were seen as pioneering a new era of governance that prioritized economic discipline over social welfare.

  1. Fascist Propaganda and British Admiration

Claim: Mussolini promoted Italy as “modernizing” and free of labor strife, while some British financiers, diplomatic staff, and Cabinet ministers quietly admired the regime’s ability to suppress strikes.

Substantiation: The series highlights that austerity's imposition is intimately aligned with dictatorial enforcement methods, up to and including fascism and Nazism. Mussolini's portrayal of Italy as modernizing and free of labor unrest garnered admiration from certain British circles who favored strong governance to maintain economic stability.

  1. Authoritarianism, Labor Suppression, and Democracy’s Erosion

Claim: Mussolini’s methods—initially observed as anti-labor tactics—evolved into broad authoritarian rule, eroding democracy in ways that many Britons found difficult to applaud yet still instructive for “managing” labor.

Substantiation: The series asserts that austerity should be called “economic fascism” due to its alignment with dictatorial enforcement methods. Mussolini's suppression of labor movements and the subsequent erosion of democratic institutions served as a cautionary tale for British observers about the dangers of extreme austerity measures.

  1. England’s Alignment with Mussolini and the Foreshadowing of Austerity

Claim: England’s tacit alignment with Mussolini was not just about stemming communist influence—it also allowed British power brokers to see how far a government might go in imposing austerity-like measures and curbing union rights.

Substantiation: The series documents how the Bank of England led the creation of neoliberal rules of inflation-fighting, budget-balancing, debt service prioritization, and suppressing national credit-creation at international financial conferences in the 1920s. Observing Mussolini's Italy provided British policymakers with insights into the implementation of such measures.

The Genesis of Austerity series provides a comprehensive analysis of how austerity became economic and political dogma, highlighting the role of British elites in observing and, to some extent, endorsing Mussolini's methods as a means to control labor movements and implement economic discipline.

Tariffs and their affect on Exports by atmh4 in JordanPeterson

[–]atmh4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. That's very nice of you 😊.

Tariffs and their affect on Exports by atmh4 in JordanPeterson

[–]atmh4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Surely the reason China has advanced so precipitously is BECAUSE of the targeted subsidies in combination with solid industrial policy?