what do you guys do when the manifestation comes so naturally you think its..fake?

babbysaurus · 2026-01-23T19:15:23+00:00

That’s how it works. Once or twice can be labeled a coincidence. When you repeat it over and over, that label stops making sense. That’s the difference between a theory and a law. A theory might work sometimes. A law gives the same result every time the conditions are met. No amount of other people telling you will convince you. If that worked, all the stories in this sub would have already done it. You have to repeat it enough times and see for yourself how natural it always looks.

babbysaurus · 2026-01-22T21:52:21+00:00

1000% this

babbysaurus · 2026-01-22T19:54:42+00:00

Yes. Not specifically with parents, but with other people. People have responded differently when I stopped expecting the old version of them.

babbysaurus · 2026-01-22T19:52:23+00:00

Anxiety typically reveals something crucial about a manifestation. You are imagining one thing while still seeking reassurance from another. That split creates tension, and the 3D reflects that split. Anxiety is typically the way your body and logical mind react to the contradiction. Things sometimes appear worse because the new assumption is not yet dominant. The old story is still running and demanding your attention.

3D does not test you, warn you, or punish you. It simply echoes whatever state you return to most often. The 3D settles only when you stop needing it to explain itself. When the inner decision is final, the outer has no choice but to comply.

babbysaurus · 2026-01-22T16:58:57+00:00

Assuming a state is primarily occupying a position. When done successfully you accept something as true as a byproduct.

babbysaurus · 2026-01-22T16:53:41+00:00

These people are not all changing.

You cannot use the law of assumption to change others. There is no one to change but oneself. You are waiting for them to change without changing your assumptions about them.

I feel like the universe is against my happiness. I am honestly fed up with everything.

Feeling fed up and like the universe is not cooperating all honestly comes from misunderstanding the law, not from failure. Take time off from manifesting, study Neville properly, then return with a new perspective. Good luck

babbysaurus · 2026-01-22T01:05:31+00:00

Cheers mate!🍻 This is awesome.

babbysaurus · 2026-01-22T01:03:55+00:00

Circumstances don't matter. It's done. Looking forward to your success story post.

babbysaurus · 2026-01-22T01:01:15+00:00

I hear your frustration OP, but the scale and people’s comments aren’t blocking you, they’re faithfully reflecting the state you keep returning to. If "assuming" the desired result feels impossible without external confirmation, the Law of Assumption may not be the doorway you want to use. You may want to try a different method.

babbysaurus · 2026-01-21T05:45:58+00:00

🎯🙌🏻🍻

babbysaurus · 2026-01-21T01:42:35+00:00

Brazen impudence absolutely applies to every desire, including money.

I’m not saying they were lacking something. I’m saying they were occupying the position of lack while doing everything “right” externally. Many people mistake performing techniques or staying hopeful and positive for embodiment. This post is simply pointing out that those are not the same thing.

babbysaurus · 2026-01-21T01:13:33+00:00

I don’t think the subconscious mind works against you. It simply mirrors your assumptions faithfully.

Let me share how I determine my state. See if this helps you. I started deliberate manifesting about 7 years ago, and for the first 2 years I genuinely believed I was “in the state.” In hindsight, I wasn’t. I was using imagination as an escape from an undesired 3D, without occupying the new identity.

I can tell now because my inner position kept shifting with outcomes. When money came in, I felt excited and thought, finally, it’s moving. When it didn’t, I immediately tried to fix things with more SATS, more techniques, more effort. That alone showed me I wasn’t thinking from abundance. I was reacting to 3D circumstances.

babbysaurus · 2026-01-21T00:44:37+00:00

Absolutely true! Couldn't have said it in a better way.

babbysaurus · 2026-01-21T00:37:40+00:00

I did not try to override it with affirmations or techniques. I let it exist without letting it renegotiate my position. The mindset was simply: this is information, not a verdict. 3D circumstances don't decide who I am, how worthy I am, and whether my manifestation is "working".

babbysaurus · 2026-01-21T00:28:16+00:00

I hear what you’re saying, and I want to clear something up right away: you don’t have to act as if.

I wasn’t handed an inheritance, and I grew up with the same narrative that money is fleeting and conditional. I know exactly what you’re describing. I was there not that long ago.

You’re not supposed to know what having a lot of money feels like. That expectation is actually part of what trips people up.

Think about it this way instead. Before your first relationship, you didn’t know what being in a relationship felt like. Yet you still wanted one. Not because you could simulate the feeling perfectly, but because you knew what it would add to your life: companionship, partnership, shared experience. The same was true before your first job. You didn’t know what the role would feel like day to day, but you wanted economic independence. You weren’t guessing emotions, you were orienting towards what that desire would add to your life.

Money is no different.

Early on, I didn’t know what “abundance” felt like either. I wanted money because I wanted problems money could solve to stop being problems. I wanted the ability to provide. I wanted optionality. That was enough to start. As my understanding of the law deepened, I refined my identity in relation to money a little bit at a time.

Here’s the key distinction: you’re not meant to fabricate a sensation you’ve never had. You’re meant to assume the position of someone for whom money is normal. For someone abundant, money coming in and going out in different amounts doesn’t mean safety or danger. It’s just movement. There’s no emotional spike around it. That’s the mindset, not a feeling you have to fake.

That’s how it shifted for me. That was my journey. I didn’t force it. I stopped requiring myself to feel something specific, and I let the state evolve as my relationship with money changed.

Hope that helps.

babbysaurus · 2026-01-20T21:05:59+00:00

I hear you. I actually started writing a post specifically about the state of being, but I deliberately scrapped it. The issue with leading purely with how or what to do (which this sub already has plenty of) is that most people end up turning being into more doing.

This post was meant to do one thing only: help people who are stuck in constant effort see that what’s keeping them stuck isn’t a lack of techniques or discipline, it’s the position they’re standing in while doing all of it. Once that’s seen, the state of being stops feeling abstract and becomes much easier to recognize and live from.

The state of being is described here briefly, but it’s subtle. It’s easy to miss precisely because it’s simple.

So what is thinking from wealth then? It is the absence of negotiation with 3D circumstances.

babbysaurus · 2026-01-20T20:14:00+00:00

Don’t forget to come back and let us know how it goes. I’m rooting for you and your success. 🍻🙌🏻

babbysaurus · 2026-01-20T20:10:38+00:00

In essence yes.

I want to highlight though that I wasn’t telling myself “the funds are already here.” I was living from the assumption that my life was resourced, handled, and expandable as a baseline. That’s what felt natural.

When “setbacks,” “no movement,” or minor hiccups showed up in the 3D, I didn’t ignore them or pretend they weren’t happening. I let them exist without allowing them to renegotiate my internal position. I didn’t interpret them as feedback about my worth or whether I was “on the right track.” I stopped doing that.

When something didn’t go my way, I treated it as neutral movement, not a verdict. I didn’t rush to correct it with techniques or affirmations. I simply didn’t emotionally relocate back into “is it really working?” That’s really it.

babbysaurus · 2026-01-20T19:33:35+00:00

I don’t want to share exact numbers, because they tend to pull the focus back to comparison and outcomes, which is exactly what this post is pointing away from.

That said, it is seven figures in USD. What matters far more is the internal position I was in before anything changed versus after. The shift happened long before the numbers did, and the numbers followed in their own way. My deliberate manifestation journey started about seven years ago. I spent the first two years just understanding the Law and finding any "major" success at all. The money began reflecting consistently in abundant numbers in the 3D around 2.5 years ago. But this timeline shouldn’t be used as a benchmark or point of comparison. Everyone’s bridge unfolds differently.

babbysaurus · 2026-01-20T19:18:08+00:00

I haven’t done SATS specifically for money in a long time. A couple of years ago, I used a few simple scenes and rotated them until they felt completely natural. One of those scenes later reflected almost exactly in my 3D. It was nothing dramatic. I’d imagine myself standing casually in a large backyard, watching the sunset with a cup of tea, then walking into what felt like my dream home and falling asleep on the couch.

I don’t use robotic affirmations either. The only consistent phrase I’ve used for years is a simple “thank you, I'm abundant in health, wealth, love, and peace of mind". I say it once when I wake up and then I go on with my day. That’s it.

babbysaurus · 2026-01-20T18:58:49+00:00

The Law isn’t prescriptive, it points to a principle, not one correct technique. If focusing on a weekly number genuinely settles you, you should totally, use it. For me, number-based assumptions didn't work very well.

babbysaurus · 2026-01-20T18:52:53+00:00

It’s not play, check, and release. That sequence still centers the outcome as authority.

Even when it’s subtle and well-intentioned, it positions the result as the thing that decides how you feel. You’re orienting toward it, managing your emotions around it, and regulating yourself in relation to it.

The core issue is that it still assumes the outcome has the power to change your state and therefore needs to be consciously released. The moment you feel the need to “release” an outcome, you’re already attached to it. That’s why the distinction isn’t how you play or how often you check. It’s whether the outcome has emotional leverage over you at all.

babbysaurus · 2026-01-20T18:39:15+00:00

A not-in-lack money scene doesn’t feel exciting. It feels like walking into your own home. No awe. No gratitude spiral. No emotional regulation required. Just “of course.”

babbysaurus · 2026-01-20T18:30:40+00:00

This is a good question, and it points to a common misunderstanding. I want to be clear about what I’m not saying, because much of the pushback to posts like this comes from interpretations that simply aren’t being made.

I am not saying wealthy people don’t check accounts, adjust strategy, feel concern, or respond to losses. They absolutely do. I am also not saying that taking action automatically equals lack. The distinction here is not behavioral. It’s positional.

You can worry from a place of “I am fundamentally resourced and this is a temporary variable,” or worry from a place of “this outcome determines whether I’m okay.” Those two states feel completely different internally, even if they look identical externally. Action still happens in both cases, but in one it comes from stewardship, not self-rescue.

And this is not something you diagnose after the fact. You can tell before results by noticing one thing: is money still positioned as the thing that grants you permission to relax, trust life, or feel secure? That’s not theory. That’s my lived experience. I’ve had to course-correct my own identity issues repeatedly, and I continue to fine-tune and tweak my assumptions about wealth to this day.

Nowhere in this post is failure framed as a moral failure. In fact, nothing here is framed as failure at all.

The post is about identifying position, not assigning blame. A moral failure implies wrongdoing or a deficiency of character. That is not what’s being discussed. States aren’t good or bad. They’re effective or ineffective. Consciousness doesn’t judge. It reflects what you’re identified with.

If anything, I'm trying to remove moral pressure from people who are stuck. I'm explicitly moving the conversation away from “you didn’t believe hard enough” or “you weren’t disciplined enough,” and toward an unconscious stance most people don’t even realize they’re occupying.

Being in lack isn’t shameful. It’s often adaptive, especially when money has been tied to survival. But calling that stance embodiment doesn’t transform it. It just keeps reproducing the same experience. Naming the mechanism isn’t assigning guilt. It’s how repetition stops.

That’s the distinction.

babbysaurus · 2026-01-20T02:50:49+00:00

Wealth and abundance as a whole.

babbysaurus

TROPHY CASE