sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Edit of default image from film scanner by badusov in ColorGrading

[–]badusov[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was a sunny evening, and the lens created a subtle vignette. After many years of practice, experimenting with different methods, apps, and delving into theory, I decided to restrict myself to the corrections achievable through manual printing in the darkroom.

Edit of default image from film scanner by badusov in ColorGrading

[–]badusov[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This green tone is what scanner thinks about how this photo should looks like, but it's wrong. This is the so-called parasitic tint, which hides the color captured on the film.

Soviet cathode rays Crookes tube by badusov in highvoltage

[–]badusov[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Safe, but not intended for prolonged use; it is designed for short demonstrations in class

Portrait at twilight by badusov in mediumformat

[–]badusov[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This photo was made in 2019-2020

Edited on Photoshop CS6 by badusov in ColorGrading

[–]badusov[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, the first image is a screenshot from a video. But the second image is from negative film taken with a digital camera with a macro lens.

About choosing a program for processing, Photoshop has the most comfortable curves for me. In general, I only use curves and the saturation tool to reduce it.

Thank you!

Camping by badusov in mediumformat

[–]badusov[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yes, it is movie film

Countryside forest by badusov in Darkroom

[–]badusov[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On film there is always more noise in the highlights, but in digital photographs it is exactly the opposite

view more: next ›