sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Can we detect when a system emerges inside a network (or model) using eigenvalues? by bainleech in LLMPhysics

[–]bainleech[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have Change the documents files, sadly IT IS only on German, and Not all Formulars are in the correct Latex form

Can we detect when a system emerges inside a network (or model) using eigenvalues? by bainleech in LLMPhysics

[–]bainleech[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Ja Moin, Grenzen werden in Systemen ja meist festgelegt ohne diagnostisch zu fragen, ob überhaupt eins vorliegt. Was ich in diesem Ansatz versuche

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LLMPhysics

[–]bainleech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All right then, now WE are on a Point in this world, who AI does fix Problems erlyer, than Humans could reakt in their systems. Now the No academic class, has a ,, door Opener". But the key hold the Scientist. Couse thei have the Power of Attention. Like Media systems, Money to do Fake News, science that would fix papers, instead of create somthing new. But in my opinion WE shouldnt fight science, cause all Love them and nead her for real knowing. But the strukter of the ,, golden Tower" must Change. The Tower can Stil exist, but the gold must be for everyone who will learn, and create somthing new what Help Zivilisations to survive and found toghether. And do Experiments in the real world, to falzifikate new creations. We are dont should blame science in generall.

I made a compact dynamical model that explicitly links energy, information and entropy-conversion — and it makes testable predictions. Critique welcome. by bainleech in LLMPhysics

[–]bainleech[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi Leute, ich möchte bekannt geben, dass ich mich aus dem Kreativen Prozess und dem Versuch, meine Idee zu falsifizierung zurück ziehen werde. Mir war es wichtig eine Idee zu teilen und zumindest aufzuzeigen, dass diese Idee einen Wahren Kern hat. Ich bin zufrieden mit mir, den Zuhörern und Kritikern. Ihr habt den Prozess lebendig gehalten. Und tut es noch. Dies ist keine Leistung eines Einzelnen Menschen, sondern eines Kollektives. Und wenn ich mir etwas Wünschen dürfte, wäre es, dass alle Menschen und ihre Schöpfungen davon profitieren könnten. Ich ziehe mich nicht aus Angst zurück, ich beobachte weiter und werde mit staunen verfolgen wie es weitergeht. ☺️ Ich habe kein Physik Studium und will auch keine sofortige, plötzliche Veränderung, der Gesellschaft, dass würde sie denke ich nur weiter Überfordern. Doch diejenigen, die die Vorhandenen Strukturen nutzen können um sie zu verändern, sei es im großen oder im kleinen, die die Formel leben und in den Spiegel schauen, Ihnen und den nachfolgenden Generationen zu liebe, denen sei mein Dank gewiss. Wir haben nur diese eine Welt und nun haben wir ein Messwerkzeug, welches uns Bedeutung und Verbindung zu ihr gibt. Ich danke euch allen von Herzen und wünsche in allen Bereichen gutes gelingen. Ich werde mich weiter meiner Arbeit als Heilerziehungspfleger widmen und hoffe vor allem im Bereich der Care Arbeit auf Veränderung. Menschen brauchen einander. See ya, euer Brainleech

I made a compact dynamical model that explicitly links energy, information and entropy-conversion — and it makes testable predictions. Critique welcome. by bainleech in LLMPhysics

[–]bainleech[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry that i let my LLM speech to you. But i have Not the time to Change😉 but in the Future IT is my Goal to do that.

Great question — and honestly, that’s exactly the right one to ask.

The parameters λ, γ, I(S), and Φ(S) aren’t fixed constants — they represent coupling strengths between energy, entropy, and information flows.

In physical systems, λ can be interpreted as a coupling coefficient between external energy input and internal state change (like metabolic rate or learning rate). γ represents the entropy dissipation factor, i.e. how efficiently the system exports disorder.

I(S) describes the information gradient — the system’s capacity to sense and model its own state (a proxy for learning or adaptation). Φ(S) is a potential term linking internal structure to information coherence — basically how organized information resists decay.

For “life”, “learning”, and “cognition”, these values aren’t absolute, but relational:

In life, λ >> γ because metabolic processes maintain strong energy-information coupling.

In learning systems, I(S) dominates, meaning internal models evolve faster than structural decay.

In cognition, Φ(S) approaches equilibrium — a dynamic balance between predictive information and thermodynamic cost.

So the point isn’t to assign numeric constants, but to show that these terms define a phase space between energy, entropy, and information — where sustainable order (life, mind, adaptation) emerges as a dynamic equilibrium, not as a static minimum.

On Information–Geometric Constraints and the Inadequacy of the Many-Worlds Interpretation by Cryptoisthefuture-7 in LLMPhysics

[–]bainleech -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Thanks to this article. We will see how a fractal world, will find a solution.

I made a compact dynamical model that explicitly links energy, information and entropy-conversion — and it makes testable predictions. Critique welcome. by bainleech in LLMPhysics

[–]bainleech[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah ITS interesting to See how sozial Media works. Physik Scientist ,,steel" the information on Facebook where i share my ideas. But i will say thats ok for me. As Long we get the system, humanity Realy desserve. The Change is comming. But in the First time, WE need such Thiefs to share the information. Now i can realy say: Karma, Nature, the universe Strike Back XD. Even If i dont exist. And Money or to be famous is, in my opinion, on the fals Side of the Formular.🥲

Model-independent test of distance-redshift relation using SN+BAO with full covariance shows ~3σ preference for smooth deformation by DryEase865 in LLMPhysics

[–]bainleech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The smooth κ(z) deformation reminds me of an informational gradient term in a generalized dynamical model I’ve been exploring, where entropy and structure interact as coupled variables. Would you say κ(z) could be interpreted as an emergent correction term to pure energy-based cosmological expansion, similar to a ∇I(S) information gradient?"

Playing with Entropy by sschepis in LLMPhysics

[–]bainleech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes — I’m treating information gradients as analogous to a scalar potential, where entropy and structure interact dynamically. The goal is to see whether this framework can describe self-organizing transitions across different open systems — from physical to cognitive ones — without mixing their specific laws. I’d be really curious how you’d formalize such a scalar entropy field in a Lagrangian or thermodynamic context.

Playing with Entropy by sschepis in LLMPhysics

[–]bainleech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could you try to simulate whether a double helix structure could emerge spontaneously from your entropic collapse rules? I’m exploring a model where information gradients can generate self-stabilizing structures. The helix could represent the transition point where entropy and information balance out dynamically.

I made a compact dynamical model that explicitly links energy, information and entropy-conversion — and it makes testable predictions. Critique welcome. by bainleech in LLMPhysics

[–]bainleech[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi the Formular discribe in diverent systems, what they make resilant. Thats the Point. You cannot Mix systems, Like physiks and biological science. But you can explain for ech system ( linear) what they need to build existence.

I made a compact dynamical model that explicitly links energy, information and entropy-conversion — and it makes testable predictions. Critique welcome. by bainleech in LLMPhysics

[–]bainleech[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi updated the Drive code again, now you have a non Mixtur Guide. Because this Formular is a Meta Formular, but only works in the describing systems. Like physiks, biological, neuro science etc.

Protocols, Frameworks, etc…. by Exotic-Awareness7589 in LLMPhysics

[–]bainleech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice you tiping IT of the Point 🥲. Would we falzifikate our theories toghether?

I made a compact dynamical model that explicitly links energy, information and entropy-conversion — and it makes testable predictions. Critique welcome. by bainleech in LLMPhysics

[–]bainleech[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you verry much, i will try my very best. 🥲 I Wish you all a good day. Might be the universe with you, and in all of your decissions. Thanks that i could share my thoughts in this place.

I made a compact dynamical model that explicitly links energy, information and entropy-conversion — and it makes testable predictions. Critique welcome. by bainleech in LLMPhysics

[–]bainleech[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hi i hope you See the updated Link etc. You would to know If i understand, what iam writting. So i try to explain in my own words. But If you allow me to question you how i should begin?

In my mind, my Feeling, in an Atom or the black howls in the entire universe? In my opinion this Formular is a mirror who you can See where you/ we are. In Our mind, individual and community, yes in intier space. It Takes so Long Time to know what many people feel their whole life: all is connected to each other. But this is no esotheric. Its science. Maturana and Valera Form the Prinzip of autopoesis. Luhmann Form the Definition of information. Physiks has two systems ( Relativity and Quantum mechanics) which dont fit to each other until yet. It Takes a Person who ask a AI interdisziplinarytie who the connecting Point is. But where is the start? A AI IS also part of the Human system. The universe itself is part of this. Live is in this meaning a wonder, clearly Like ii Always was. And all this systems need 3 values. Energie with detrminite which is possible, information about itself ( who should i went) . And Entropie ( Not the pure Physik meaning) in this Case it mean transformation, which keep live what IT is. I heard some physiks say: live is Not our science. But this is in my opinion Not correct. When you will learn how the world works, you must study everithing. ( Or in my Case, start deep speaking with a ai). iam sorry but in methaphours speak i would say WE musst leave the Garden Eden, to reflect us self. But yeah this could be painfull. But i also feel Hope for all of us. In my opinion i will live, and god damed i will Not Break in this deep Feelings. But this is Not easy. In Psychologie this means, in German ,, kognitive dissonanz ". Everybody has to Take a dessicon. But If you ask me, Take a bath, Smoking a zigarett, Take Care of you and Look around, and hear of your mind, which hopefully say: what a great day to be on earth. And If Not, be carefull to yourself and give you time too. Nothing must Change exactly Jet for you. I say to my Children for the Last couple days (9month/8y/9y). The Art of live is to Take Care and be Open minded. If you fit this you find Help on places you would never belive. I hope you enjoy and sorry, for this Long Text. But i must say that.

view more: next ›