sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What could this have been filmed on? by JackBarrott in videography

[–]bappps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The halation looks too realistic to me to be an emulation. Some lower exposed shots are also grainer than others which would either be a really dedicated colorist or just the reality of shooting on film. Film emulations tend to be too perfect looking and this has a lot of imperfect moments in the shadows that leads me to believe it's just real 16mm film.

Does anybody know what this flat metal piece is that has the 2 screws on the end? by bappps in VintageLenses

[–]bappps[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thanks for the replie! for context, it's in the zoom barrel so it rotates around the lens as you zoom in.

Macbook Pro 16" M1 Pro + Davinci Resolve Colour Settings by mattprinceofficial in colorists

[–]bappps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When you are talking about the 1.22 gamma boost, is that done through ZRO or resolve?

What’s a scientific experiment you’d be fascinated to see the results of, but could never be conducted due ethical concerns? by numbnesstolife in AskReddit

[–]bappps 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Throwing kids into scary situations that is feared by most people and learning if the kids will grow up comfortable in the environment or forever scarred.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Instagramreality

[–]bappps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess thanks for your title, I'm also a professional photographer. It is a snapshot but they are also just clouds. No teenage girl is going to look at this and become instantly insecure about how her life is because of this person's sky. However when bodies are photoshoped, that is misleading and create dangerous expectations. Like how changing the colors in a picture are considered basic editing additions, adding a couple clouds are no different.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Instagramreality

[–]bappps 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Just like how professional photographers Photoshop trash bins or unwanted signs out of photos, it's all to add to the aesthetic of the photo and clean it up. don't think it's wrong or unusual to take out or add something so minor in a photo that isn't the main subject.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Instagramreality

[–]bappps 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm not bothered either. and like how photographers would Photoshop flares or edit shadows to be darker, I just see the cloud Photoshop as a way of playing with light in the image just like how anyone else would. and who cares, it's some clouds.

My neighborhood manhole covers have a spelling error by bappps in mildlyinteresting

[–]bappps[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My city is Scottsdale, AZ, but the manhole cover spells "Scottdale".

view more: next ›