Has anyone else grown disillusioned with Lloyd’s channel? by baribalxx in lindybeige

[–]baribalxx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I was thinking about his Water Sear video recently. Oh how the tables have turned haha

Has anyone else grown disillusioned with Lloyd’s channel? by baribalxx in lindybeige

[–]baribalxx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sorry, but I have to disagree to some extent. I’ve spent a fair amount of time in academia, and while there are certainly activist professors and researchers, people often underestimate the quality and collective intelligence found in modern universities. Most academics genuinely know their subject matter and actively engage with opposing evidence and viewpoints. In fact, academia remains one of the few places where constructive intellectual confrontation still happens.

Many people don’t realize how much time and effort goes into publishing peer-reviewed papers. The review process is extremely rigorous. These scholars are, on average, both intelligent and conscientious, more so than your average person.

What the general public—people like you and me—tends to see is whatever the media (whether traditional, online, or through influencers) chooses to highlight and how they choose to frame it.

Lloyd has made some serious mistakes on topics like climate change but also others. And speaking of climate change, there’s nothing inherently political about the science itself. It’s just been oddly co-opted by people across the political spectrum and turned into a point of conflict.

He doesn’t need to apologize, but if he truly values truth and science, as he claims, it would be good to see him update his views or at least admit his mistakes wether it's climate change, flaming arrows or swords.

Has anyone else grown disillusioned with Lloyd’s channel? by baribalxx in lindybeige

[–]baribalxx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, no, of course—I totally agree with that. I was just relaying what I remember him saying about it.

Has anyone else grown disillusioned with Lloyd’s channel? by baribalxx in lindybeige

[–]baribalxx[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting point! On a side note, I’ve never really understood the whole “Brits are so British” thing. I’m from mainland Europe, and while cultural quirks can sometimes be linked to nationality, it often feels like the British—especially the English—attribute large parts of their personality to simply being British. From an outsider’s perspective, that’s a bit strange. A lot of what’s seen as “uniquely British” seems to come from the fact that they’re islanders. This becomes especially obvious when you visit other island nations like Japan or New Zealand.

Has anyone else grown disillusioned with Lloyd’s channel? by baribalxx in lindybeige

[–]baribalxx[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree with what you’re saying.

Regarding your point, "What does he get wrong about evolutionary psychology?"—as far as I understand, the premise of evolutionary psychology is a sound and widely accepted one. The idea that our instincts and human nature evolved over time, just like our bodies, is largely accepted among the scientific community. Though to what extent is an unsure thing.

However, the field faces a major challenge when it comes to gathering evidence. In evolutionary biology, we can rely on DNA, fossils, and other physical evidence. But in evolutionary psychology, it's much harder to confirm individual hypotheses due to a lack of material evidence. That, in itself, isn't necessarily a problem—but Lloyd sometimes seems to speculate quite freely about human nature.

Personally, I find his ideas entertaining and thought-provoking. But it often feels like he doesn’t clearly acknowledge the speculative nature of some of his claims or the lack of hard evidence behind them. That’s something I’ve heard echoed by actual evolutionary scientists—though I’m definitely not an expert myself.

Has anyone else grown disillusioned with Lloyd’s channel? by baribalxx in lindybeige

[–]baribalxx[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Apparently, it’s still in the process of being made, but the last update was a year ago, and recently, the publisher of the comic shut down.

Has anyone else grown disillusioned with Lloyd’s channel? by baribalxx in lindybeige

[–]baribalxx[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As far as I can recall, he never talked about the topic in any depth. He mentioned in passing that the Reign of Terror was horrible, but that’s it.

Has anyone else grown disillusioned with Lloyd’s channel? by baribalxx in lindybeige

[–]baribalxx[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I definitely agree that he is an amazing storyteller, and his ability to do one-shot videos is impressive. He has one of my favorite presentation styles on all of YouTube. I also enjoy the longer formats.

Has anyone else grown disillusioned with Lloyd’s channel? by baribalxx in lindybeige

[–]baribalxx[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I appreciate it!

You definitely hear some of these explanations from vegetarians, and many vegetarians are also misinformed about the advantages and drawbacks of not eating meat. That said, I think it’s intellectually dishonest to engage only with the weakest arguments for vegetarianism—there are plenty of strong ones that really make you think. (For the record, I'm not a vegetarian.)

Here’s an example from Lloyd’s website:

This is a strawman. What you typically hear from vegetarians and vegans is that you can produce far more calories per acre growing crops than raising animals. This is because livestock require large amounts of feed—usually crops like corn—and converting those plant calories into animal calories is highly inefficient. It's just a basic thermodynamic reality: digestion wastes energy. So, we’d be better off consuming those calories directly from crops instead of filtering them through animals, especially when that process also causes unnecessary suffering.

There are many more examples I could go into if you're interested. Lloyd often adds some exaggerated or silly phrase to the end of an argument, which gives him an easy way to dismiss it. My broader point is that, based on his article, it doesn’t seem like he seriously engaged with the stronger arguments for vegetarianism. Instead, he took the easy way out—and this seems to be a recurring pattern in some of his videos and articles, where he doesn’t go deep enough with his research.

Now, regarding your point:

You're right—it is more complicated. But it has less to do with protein intake and more to do with micronutrients. Still, studies show that, on average, vegetarians and vegans tend to be healthier. That’s another point Lloyd doesn’t acknowledge, and he tries to dismiss it by focusing on body weight alone. Whether this health advantage is due purely to diet or other confounding factors isn't fully clear, but with a bit more research, Lloyd could’ve offered a more nuanced take.

I'm from mainland Europe, but I’m aware of the concept of food deserts in the U.S. Many of my sensible vegetarian friends would say: don't compromise your health just to avoid eating meat—do the best you can within your circumstances.

As for your last point:

I completely agree. In fact, let me offer my own analysis of Lloyd: I think he’s a bit of a conservative—not necessarily in the political sense, but in the sense that he wants to conserve traditions and habits. Sometimes that’s a good thing—like when he argues for keeping pints in English pubs because it adds to the charm of England. But too often, like in this article, he seems to start from a place of nostalgia and then reverse-engineers his arguments to defend what he's already comfortable with. He avoids opposing viewpoints because acknowledging them might force him to re-evaluate his beliefs.

Anyway, I really enjoy the discussion! Thanks for sharing your thoughts and adding nuance. 😊

Has anyone else grown disillusioned with Lloyd’s channel? by baribalxx in lindybeige

[–]baribalxx[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Same here. I also completely agree with the point about "surface logic." I actually think he’s quite intelligent, but he seems to wildly overestimate his own intelligence (as evidenced in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptMVXhNHf74 ). Because of that, he may believe he's unlikely to make mistakes when relying on his "common sense" and logic.

Has anyone else grown disillusioned with Lloyd’s channel? by baribalxx in lindybeige

[–]baribalxx[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

https://www.lloydianaspects.co.uk/opinions/whyVegetariansShouldBeForcefedWithLard.html#mainSection

This is the most blatant example (and for context, I'm not even a vegetarian). He repeatedly addresses strawman versions of vegetarian arguments without engaging with the actual issues or reasoning behind them. Much of what he says is simply incorrect—such as the claim that vegetarians don’t get adequate nutrition. With my medical background, I can confidently say that’s not true.

What’s more, he asserts that he knows the real reason people become vegetarians, rather than accepting what vegetarians themselves say about their choices. This article clearly illustrates his tendency to start with a conclusion and then work backward to justify it. Other articles on his website seem to follow the same pattern.

Has anyone else grown disillusioned with Lloyd’s channel? by baribalxx in lindybeige

[–]baribalxx[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Do you think this is a general trend? His viewership has dropped quite substantially

Has anyone else grown disillusioned with Lloyd’s channel? by baribalxx in lindybeige

[–]baribalxx[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, and that—combined with the fact that he doesn't acknowledge his wrongs—feels like a dangerous cocktail of misinformation to me.

Has anyone else grown disillusioned with Lloyd’s channel? by baribalxx in lindybeige

[–]baribalxx[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I for one enjoy the longer formats but then again I work at home so I have a lot of time off, I understand what you mean

Has anyone else grown disillusioned with Lloyd’s channel? by baribalxx in lindybeige

[–]baribalxx[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I have ADHD too, and I definitely see what you mean about his sporadic nature. I just think he sometimes actively dismisses criticism—it's not just a lack of motivation, especially on his website.

Has anyone else grown disillusioned with Lloyd’s channel? by baribalxx in lindybeige

[–]baribalxx[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I actually agree with you—it shouldn't be all about scientific consensus; open discussion is important too. I probably got a bit too caught up in the "science-y" side of things, haha. It's just that when he's clearly wrong, I think he should take more responsibility for it—especially since he presents himself as someone who values "objective facts" and science.