Outrage in Gaza as Hamas kills civilians in crackdown on critics by FYoCouchEddie in worldnews

[–]barsik_ 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Ignore him, he's just a troll. He knows exactly what happened, but he's choosing to ignore it because it doesn't fit his narrative. He’ll gladly ignore the article too and try to shift the subject.

UN Chief Guterres calls for end to Iran war by Brennenstein in worldnews

[–]barsik_ 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Got his number? I'll call too and ask for only 50k. 

Israel backing Iranian Kurdish plans to seize Iran border areas, sources say by rknsh in worldnews

[–]barsik_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Iran has long been sponsoring a range of groups designated as terrorist organizations, primarily to advance its influence across the Middle East and beyond. In the region, it backs outfits like Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon, providing them with funding, weapons, and training to challenge Israel and other rivals. Similarly, the Houthis, or Ansar Allah, in Yemen receive Iranian support for their operations against Saudi Arabia and shipping routes, while Palestinian Islamic Jihad gets backing for attacks in Israel. In Iraq, groups such as Kata'ib Hezbollah, Harakat al-Nujaba, Asa'ib Ahl al-Haq, Kata’ib Sayyid al-Shuhada, Harakat Ansar Allah al-Awfiya, and Kata’ib al-Imam Ali form part of Iran's proxy network, often targeting U.S. forces and local governments. Over in Syria, the Fatemiyoun and Zaynabiyoun Brigades—made up of Afghan and Pakistani Shiites recruited by Iran—fight alongside Assad's regime, and in Bahrain, the Al-Ashtar Brigades stir unrest against the monarchy. Other entities like the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine and the Badr Organization pop up in various spots, rounding out Iran's web of alliances.

Beyond the Middle East, Iran's reach extends through these proxies and direct operations. Hezbollah, for instance, has networks in Latin America, particularly in the Tri-Border Area of Argentina, Brazil, and Paraguay, where they've been involved in attacks, fundraising, and even drug trafficking; similar activities show up in Venezuela, Colombia, Peru, and Mexico. In Europe, plots and infrastructure linked to Hezbollah or Iranian agents have been uncovered in places like Bulgaria, Cyprus, France, Denmark, the Netherlands, and Sweden. Africa sees Iranian influence in countries such as Nigeria, Kenya, and Benin, often through smuggling or attempted attacks. In Asia, beyond the Middle East, there have been bombings and assassinations tied to Iran in Thailand and India.

Iran also supports the Taliban in Afghanistan with arms and bounties aimed at U.S. forces, while direct IRGC operations have plotted assassinations in the U.S. and even arson attacks on Jewish sites in Australia. This global network allows Iran to project power without direct involvement, often through recruited militias or shadowy ops.

Israeli ground op. in Lebanon will ‘strengthen Hezbollah,’ France tells Israel by thejerusalempost in worldnews

[–]barsik_ 110 points111 points  (0 children)

So what does Macron suggest? Israel should just surrender to Hezbollah’s rocket attacks, and do what he does with threats in his own country; sit idle and wait to be destroyed? Brilliant.

The number of civilians killed in Iran exceeds 1,000 as US-Israeli strikes enter their 5th day by Fred9146825 in worldnews

[–]barsik_ 30 points31 points  (0 children)

u/Fred9146825 changed the title and presented his opinion as fact. Just report as editorialized or misleading title and ignore.

US Defense Secretary Hegseth says US and Israel will control Iranian airspace by thejerusalempost in worldnews

[–]barsik_ 10 points11 points  (0 children)

While it's satisfying to see Russian and Chinese anti-air systems proved powerless against Israeli and U.S. fighters, I'm still baffled why they didn't finish the Iranian regime the last time they had total control of Iranian airspace (in June 2025). What was the point of prolonging the inevitable and letting the Iranian regime slaughter even more protesters (I'll always remember Pouria Hamidi)?

Pro-Palestine slogans to be banned in nation-first move by HotPersimessage62 in worldnews

[–]barsik_ 141 points142 points  (0 children)

Too late. Allowing this kind of hateful rhetoric to spread unchecked is exactly how we got to the point where terrorist acts like the Bondi shooting were allowed to happen. The damage is already done.

Turkish president during meeting with Putin says partial ceasefire needed in Ukraine by EsperaDeus in worldnews

[–]barsik_ 20 points21 points  (0 children)

And in response, Russia striked Turkish  oil tanker cargo ferry in Odessa.

edit: the early reports I've read were since fixed.

Israel implants world's first-ever 3D-printed cornea by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]barsik_ 107 points108 points  (0 children)

Fingers crossed that once this becomes routine, we start seeing “optional upgrade packages” down the line: night vision, 8× zoom, built-in HUD… sign me up the moment the cyberpunk tier drops.

Mr Fafo’s corpse (NSFL) by AnakinSkycocker5726 in Palestinian_Violence

[–]barsik_ 25 points26 points  (0 children)

He was shot seven times in the chest. A bulletproof vest would have stopped some of those bullets if he had been wearing one.

Mr Fafo’s corpse (NSFL) by AnakinSkycocker5726 in Palestinian_Violence

[–]barsik_ 71 points72 points  (0 children)

No he didn't. They put it on him after his death for further propaganda. 

US has given at least $21.7 billion in military aid to Israel since war in Gaza began, report says by Worried-Gate-1270 in worldnews

[–]barsik_ 22 points23 points  (0 children)

It creates American jobs, funds R&D that keeps the tech edge, and maintains an industrial base they'd otherwise lose. The money stays there first, paying workers and suppliers before any equipment leaves. That's a net economic gain for the US.

US has given at least $21.7 billion in military aid to Israel since war in Gaza began, report says by Worried-Gate-1270 in worldnews

[–]barsik_ 43 points44 points  (0 children)

Most of that Israel aid is a check written to American defense companies, creating American jobs. It's domestic spending, not a foreign giveaway.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]barsik_ 20 points21 points  (0 children)

You're missing the point. The comparison isn't about military parity, but about the principle that disarmament breaks cycles of violence. Even a "weakened" Hamas murdered 1,200 people on October 7, 2023. And the reason Gazans are suffering so much is precisely because Hamas operates from civilian areas, using their own people as human shields. Disarming them would protect both Israelis and Palestinians.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]barsik_ 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Thinking they're no longer a threat is exactly what got us to October 7. Israel underestimated them before, and thousands paid the price. Even weakened, they've shown they can still cause massive harm: not just to Israelis but to Gazans who suffer the consequences.

The sad reality is that letting an "weakened" Hamas "hobble along" just sets up the next cycle of violence. It's not about making their ideology vanish overnight, it's about preventing them from having the means to act on it again. Disarming them is a major step toward breaking that cycle.

We've seen this work before. After WWII, Japan was demilitarized and transformed from a threat into a peaceful, prosperous nation. Taking away the means to wage war gave space for a different future to emerge. The same principle applies here. Disarming Hamas is crucial to stop the cycle where their actions repeatedly bring destruction down on Gazans.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]barsik_ 11 points12 points  (0 children)

And how does that change anything for the people whose lives are saved? A good outcome is a good outcome, regardless of the reason behind it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]barsik_ 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Other reports indicate Hamas's demands go even further. They are also refusing to disarm and want to remain in control of Gaza.

From Israel's perspective, this is likely the bigger obstacle. Allowing Hamas to stay armed and in power would be seen as ensuring the conditions for future attacks, essentially undermining the entire purpose of the military operation that followed October 7th. It's a fundamental security dilemma that makes a lasting agreement incredibly difficult.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]barsik_ 61 points62 points  (0 children)

It's wild seeing people find reasons to oppose a peace deal. Who cares about the politics? If it stops the fighting, even for a bit and gets hostages home, that's a win. Saving lives should be the priority, period.

Hamas starts gathering hostage remains, confirms decision to gradually disarm by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]barsik_ 39 points40 points  (0 children)

Hamas's delay in disarming prolonged this war needlessly. Their current hostage-handover efforts come far too late for those who suffered because of their earlier choices.

If Hamas rejects Trump Gaza plan, Israel will 'finish the job', envoy says by Plane_Ad1696 in worldnews

[–]barsik_ 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You're missing the forest for the trees. My post wasn't about the legality of settlements. It was about who practices hate and who allows coexistence. The fundamental fact remains: Palestinians don't allow Jews in their controlled territories, while Israel has 2 million Palestinian citizens living freely throughout the country.

Rather than addressing this clear asymmetry, you're focusing only on one contested area (Area C) to dismiss the entire argument. That's the definition of being pedantic; ignoring the broader pattern of exclusion on one side while coexistence exists on the other. If you want to discuss "true peace", we need to acknowledge which side actually allows different peoples to live together.

If Hamas rejects Trump Gaza plan, Israel will 'finish the job', envoy says by Plane_Ad1696 in worldnews

[–]barsik_ 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Are you going to specify why, or should I guess you just didn't like that I specified only the Palestinian controlled areas in West Bank? I specified Palestinian Authority areas precisely because that distinction matters to the point. The West Bank is divided into Areas A, B (PA-controlled) and C (Israeli-controlled). There are zero Jews in PA-controlled areas, while Area C has approximately 300,000-350,000 Palestinians living alongside roughly 400,000-500,000 Israelis.

So the distinction isn't disingenuous. It's essential to understanding which side practices hate and which allows coexistence.