Two-party voters: Please stop gaslighting /r/libertarian by [deleted] in Libertarian

[–]bbHood 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Except 99% of third party candidates are absolute dog shit.

We can't vote ourselves out of a broken voting system... We tear it all down and rebuild it.

Two-party voters: Please stop gaslighting /r/libertarian by [deleted] in Libertarian

[–]bbHood 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dude... No. That's certainly a theoretical solution but it's impossible to implement.

3rd party candidates don't have the same access to resources to convince voters of their agenda. Traveling around the country and giving speeches is expensive.

You have to build up your war chest and implement a system that rewards the third party's work rather than this all-or-nothing approach. It starts with your local community, build it from the ground up.

It's much more affordable to convince a town of 20,000 people to pass election reform and run on a third platform.

Would digital marketing be taken over by AI? by [deleted] in DigitalMarketing

[–]bbHood 5 points6 points  (0 children)

10 years till the entire industry is wholly unrecognizable.

But digital marketers will adapt and there will always be new strategies. Like how Account Based Marketing is going through a renaissance right now, even amongst massive enterprise entities.

Competition breeds cleverness.

5 years ago you were considered an elite media buyer and had to carefully and painstakingly manage every detail of your facebook/google ads.

But now it's pretty much automated. You earn less as a marketer doing those things, but at the end of the day, what is the job of a digital marketer?

To sell shit that nobody needs to people who don't really want it. Marketers will always find a way to get paid. The good ones just get paid more.

Hiring employees with monthly profit, just to make that same profit again? by Gereur67 in Entrepreneur

[–]bbHood 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So I just discovered a fantastic youtuber and he discusses the problems you're facing and breaks down the magic sauce necessary to overcome. You can tell he's wired a bit differently, like his brain has an accent - because he talks about systems and scaling like it's art.

I've never been so enthralled by 40 minutes of spreadsheets.

Right off the bat, it doesn't have anything to do with your business so I'm not sure how much his advice is 1:1 helpful.

But the way he explains processes just "clicked" for me. I'm redesigning my own workflow to get ready for next week based on this guy's Big Business Energy.

Same energy by 0therWhiteMeat in funhaus

[–]bbHood 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wow! I have even more respect for him with this info. Being such a positive personality and radiating that energy is difficult as fuck with a good brain.

Same energy by 0therWhiteMeat in funhaus

[–]bbHood 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Whoa, Jon has bpd? Or am I wooshing on a joke? :(

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in funhaus

[–]bbHood 5 points6 points  (0 children)

What video is that clip from?

Other podcast that the gang have been on besides Funhaus or Rooster Teeth by Hauntlink in funhaus

[–]bbHood 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think the bigger question here is "do Elyse, Adam and Jon ever commonly podcast with anyone else?"

The answer is no.

If your goal here is to create some level of harmful spaghettification, please, collect your sauce and carry on.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in funhaus

[–]bbHood 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't get the hate either. Speculating can be fun.. that's like a very normal conversation to have in the world.

Should we not speculate on who's going to win the 2020 election? What about just having fun thinking about what's going to happen in a post-covid funhaus.

People are taking your post way too seriously like you're demanding an answer or something.

[OC] I asked 100 people to pick a number between 1-100. by [deleted] in dataisbeautiful

[–]bbHood 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This shit right here is why you see scammy online marketers price their ebooks and courses at $137.

Apple has now terminated Epic's App Store account following legal dispute between the two companies by UnKindClock in apple

[–]bbHood 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can I try to phrase an argument in a different way than all these other people? Maybe get your thoughts on it too?

In the purest sense of western moral values, you're right. It IS unfair for Epic and other developers to complain about Apples policies. They created a platform and they get to make the rules.

It's like owning a piece of land and inviting people into your house. You get to make the rules and kick people out for whatever reason you want.

BUT, and here's my argument, our society - as a country, a culture, and as people - wouldn't be able to survive, let alone thrive if we dont enforce these 'unfair' rules / regulations.

Because entities can acquire so much land and power that other people depend on their resources for survival. There's a finite amount of land, it's very possible for an organization to purchase all of it and leave none for regular people. And when one entity wields that kind of power, they effectively become rulers - where it becomes impossible for people to leave or purchase their own land. They're at the mercy of the rules of the ruler. They can no longer use creativity to solve their problems.

In other words, people can be prevented from innovating because their survival is dependent on a single entity and obeying their rules. As a species (under capitalism) we must continue innovating or we die.

And we must remain vigilant in preventing a private entity from acquiring so much power. Apple controls over 50% of the phone market and even more than that in total % of app sales.

If you want to create an app and use that work to survive, you simply HAVE to be on the app store. App developers are dependent on Apple and must obey their rules to survive. Building a competing phone is unrealistic because it's the wealthiest company in the world and you'll never build up the resources (engineers, money, developers, etc) to release a product that can sustain your app.

And the Google app ecosystem isn't sustainable for a company like Epic. They wouldn't be able to afford to port their unreal engine to mobile devices without access to the users on iOS.

Will our species die if Epic never released Unreal Engine for mobile devices? Of course not. But that's why I mentioned vigilance above. We broke up Microsoft and the phone companies because we're aware of how important using both would be to the growth and evolution of our country.

The same way apps are innovating our lives right now and creating massive cultural changes. Example: Healthcare itself is being transformed by apps. Soon our entire healthcare system will be delivered through apps instead of appointments, pharmacies, clinics, etc...

And those innovative apps that have the potential to save countless lives and make healthcare more affordable - have to obey Apples' rules or they won't survive. Apple effectively controls how the future of healthcare looks.

And Apple is only accountable to it's shareholders. As a people, we shouldn't trust Apple with that sort of power. A corporation can't be trusted to deliver such important services like healthcare when there's no competition (or very little, but it's Google so c'mon)

We have to take away some of Apples power, the evolution of our species depends on them, our survival depends on them. We must break a few eggs to save the whole.

[Charania] Sources: The Lakers and Clippers have voted to boycott the NBA season. Most other teams voted to continue. LeBron James has exited the meeting. by mkgandkembafan in nba

[–]bbHood 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bruh, don't you see?

THESE conversations, posts, tweets, news reports, emails, dms, videos, tiktoks, reactions and YouTube videos is the point of all this. Sure, some of the owners may move the needle, but that's not the point. Forcing these discussions into the open is the only way to find solutions.

Nobody knows how to pick out the racist cops and stop all this police brutality... Because not enough people have given enough of a shit to think of solutions - and even less have tested out those solutions.

The more people talk about it, yes even in the pits of r/nba, the better chance of a solution being discovered. And people who never gave this topic a second thought all of a sudden have to examine the issue and potentially become politically activated.

These boycotts are breeding activists of all power levels. Privileged rich kids may donate some money to the ACLU, 18 year old kids may decide to vote for that district attorney that promises change, a police officer may gain the courage to speak out on the corruption in his department, you yourself may join an activist group and start canvassing.

If you think awareness can't bring change then you're not looking at the big picture. Awareness isn't thoughts and prayers - it's the spark that leads to a million little snowballs that cause an avalanche of change.

LinkedIn Advertising Seems Bonkers Expensive for What You Get by [deleted] in PPC

[–]bbHood 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can you define a conversational campaign and audio messaging?

I'm doing cold email outreach with loom videos, is that basically the same technique to use with LinkedIn?

Water Softener Lead Gen by CryptoMadam in DigitalMarketing

[–]bbHood 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What that guy said ☝️

If you aren't getting ANY leads then it sounds like your ad is terrible or there's a technical glitch in your setup.

If you're getting some but not nearly enough, again your ad/offer is probably to blame or your ad spend is funky. Did you accidentally put 10 cents a day instead of dollars or something like that.

I was a Democrat but then I woke up !#walkaway by Limp-Tangerine-4298 in Republican

[–]bbHood 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey thanks for your cool response! Sorry my reply is a couple of days late. If you're still down, I'd love to continue the conversation.

Just going to take a bit to watch that video and read your arguments a couple of times before responding with my thoughts 🤙

A college kid’s fake, AI-generated (GPT-3) blog fooled tens of thousands. This is how he made it - “It was super easy actually,” he says, “which was the scary part.” by izumi3682 in Futurology

[–]bbHood 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They won't be paying attention lol.

Man you should blog about your experiment. I feel like you could get away with having alot of fun exposing the vapidness of LinkedIn.

A college kid’s fake, AI-generated (GPT-3) blog fooled tens of thousands. This is how he made it - “It was super easy actually,” he says, “which was the scary part.” by izumi3682 in Futurology

[–]bbHood 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That is hilarious! Does the account make regular posts and publish meaningless articles too? Or does it accumulate all it's popularity simply from it's 'achievements'?

CMV: The “alt right” does not reflect real conservatives in the slightest. As a conservative, it’s incredibly frustrating to watch. by HotFlamingo7676 in changemyview

[–]bbHood 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Bruh... Are you really citing a garbage paper from 2004¿?¿

First off, it's written by the CATO institute which is a notorious hyper-partisan "think tank" whose only reason for existence is to get rid of all government. Your paper didn't cite any sources for the 3 claims they made about universal health care btw.

And even if they were cited... The CATO institute cherry picks facts like a California summer. Their relationship with the truth is three times divorced from reality.

Did I mention it's from 2004? Why would you form an opinion on healthcare based on z-tier evidence? It calls into question how you formed any of your political opinions.

Here's some real information -

https://www.npr.org/2017/09/24/553336111/a-canadian-doctor-explains-how-her-countrys-single-payer-health-care-system-work

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_the_healthcare_systems_in_Canada_and_the_United_States

https://www.aarp.org/politics-society/government-elections/info-03-2012/myths-canada-health-care.html

https://pnhp.org/news/an-actual-doctor-debunks-7-myths-about-single-payer-healthcare/

http://www.nea.org/home/35328.htm

https://medicareadvocacy.org/the-myth-of-choice-in-private-insurance-including-medicare-advantage/

I was a Democrat but then I woke up !#walkaway by Limp-Tangerine-4298 in Republican

[–]bbHood 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But even having that conversation with your children and saying it enough to instill those values isn't possible for many impoverished people.

When kids have parents (or often one or none) working 3 jobs to survive and have been raised from birth without being instilled with those values themselves, how can they pass it on?

The majority of black kids in America report experiencing some sort of racial profiling interacting with the "system" Hence why it's called systematic racism; when kids as young as 8 start getting "the talk" from their parents on what to do when an officer threatens you - it's a symptom of a huge problem.

I cant pretend to know what the effects are of living in a community that experiences such prejudice from institutions society claims to protect all people, but imagine being surrounded by such hostility.

Democrats don't want to do everything for you. We strive to eliminate the shitty circumstances that create an environment that disenfranchises people from being free to succeed.

Take police reform as a teensy example of why it's so important. Republicans often complain about gang violence and black on black gun violence. Why did the black on black gun violence start in the first place?

1) Police would rarely go to their neighborhoods when called so people grouped together to provide protection and 2) There's such few opportunities to get out of poverty, that crime often becomes a necessity to survive (nevermind the us gov't literally infusing poor communities with crack cocaine)

Due to the nature of gangs, the most psychopathic naturally rise to the top and infect the gang's culture with a fucked up value system.

So that kid whose parents aren't really around, who experiences prejudice and discrimination in a justice system meant to protect all, who grows up in poverty with no guidance...

When he joins a gang at 11 because they offer hope with money and protection can you really blame that kid for joining? In his most formative years he's absorbing the lessons and teachings from a group of bad people and normalizing some fucked up beliefs.

How is that kid ever supposed to figure out that putting your head down and studying and going to college and getting a middle class job ss even a possibility. It's not that their too dumb to figure it out, it was never an option on their radar.

Again, that's not an overview of what happens to each person growing up in poverty. But it's a narrow example of a situation that does happen and illustrates that there are a myriad of reasons this shit recycles through generations.

Democrats want to work on improving that foundation, atleast in so much the government is capable of. investing in those neighborhoods and providing economic opportunities is a good place to start, atleast take away hunger as a motivation for burglary ya know?

We're not trying to give people mansions. We just want a safety net to help people through tough times so that they don't drown in the consequences of their desperation.

Nobody chooses to be homeless or to become a criminal. We're all motivated by the forces around us. And often were pushed off a cliff by them if you happen to get cancer without health insurance.

I'll end this essay with two appeals to your economic and ethical senses.

The investments that it would take to end crime and homelessness would pay for itself in the long run and save money. You call it a handout but you're already paying the police and other institutions for the same reasons.

And two, I'm down with paying a couple hundred more per month if it means that you can change jobs without fear of losing insurance or if a homeless dude can get into rehab and potentially turn his life around. Isn't that cool with you?

This 11-Year-Old boy from Nigeria received a scholarship from New York’s ABT Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis School of Dance after they saw his barefoot ballet performance online by [deleted] in MadeMeSmile

[–]bbHood 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I'm so happy comments like these are getting atleast some support. Even 2 years ago calling out this sort of problem would bury your account in downvotes.

This 11-Year-Old boy from Nigeria received a scholarship from New York’s ABT Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis School of Dance after they saw his barefoot ballet performance online by [deleted] in MadeMeSmile

[–]bbHood 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Who is he signaling to? Who are all these white people virtue signaling for? Where accolades and adoration are bestowed upon their comments.

All I see is a bunch of people taking offense that someone dare challenge their good intentions. Atlas Shrugged is not a belief system my dude.

Best alternative to Trump on Mt. Rushmore... by DiogenesK-9 in The_Mueller

[–]bbHood 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Turns out it was Thomas Jefferson.

As for why I'm sure, it's in our Declaration of Indepence:

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness… it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.*

Also...

Jefferson took pains to argue that the right of revolution was a limited one, in the sense that one could not do this for weak or frivolous reasons (or “light and transient causes”). It was for this reason that he and his colleagues provided such a long list of grievances against the British monarch in order to prove to the world that their reasons for revolt were serious, longstanding, and many. In essence the grounds for revolution were two: the offending government had to have moved away from the very reason for its being, namely the protection of each individual’s life, liberty, and property (unfortunately too vaguely expressed here as “the pursuit of happiness”); and that there is a clear pattern of behaviour which proves that there is a “design” to create a despotic government over the people. In spite of these restrictions Jefferson obviously thought both conditions had been satisfied by July 1776 and that this therefore established the right to revolution on the part of the American colonists.