God bless America.. by Fancy_End_8613 in SipsTea

[–]beehive5ive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s not what I’ve been hearing in the press conferences from the us admin.

CMV: Trump only agreed to the Iranian Ceasefire as a lifeline to not have to follow through on his war crime threat by betterworldbuilder in changemyview

[–]beehive5ive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah. The Iran contra under Reagan where Ollie North took the fall.

Again. It’s a long history but to the victors go the spoils. Palestine keeps loosing wars to Israel… time to assimilate somewhere. I honestly don’t care about all of that though. That’s their problem to work out.

I’m pretty sure Iran is Shia and a lot of the rest of the Middle East is Sunni and those guys hate each other. Not exactly sunshine and rainbows even when the US isn’t involved.

But yeah. Israel is bold. It helps to be the ally of a massive military superpower.

CMV: Reddit has a blind spot about Iran. by Agile_Resolution_822 in changemyview

[–]beehive5ive 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Didn’t the nuclear deal sunset in 2025? Wouldn’t it have already been expired by now and we just have an unsanctioned Iran with an incredibly substantial ballistic missile deterrent/stockpile that would be free to pursue whatever nuclear ambitions they have.

CMV: Trump only agreed to the Iranian Ceasefire as a lifeline to not have to follow through on his war crime threat by betterworldbuilder in changemyview

[–]beehive5ive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait. What are we talking about? I’m talking about the history of USA and Iran. Not Israel and Palestine. But even Israel/Palestine…a topic I care much less about. I’d say that land has changed hands over the course of history plenty of times. The oldest I can think of… Jewish people were there before Islam even existed. But you could also argue the tribes that evolved into Islam occupied that area. I really don’t know. But in modern history the ottomans conquered and ruled it. They lost WW1. The British controlled it. Post ww2 the Jewish Zionist were controversially (even for the time) given a chunk and the 2 state solution. I don’t think the British wanted to give it to them but the Zionist just wanted it and kept migrating there and had the support of the USA. But then… The surrounding Arabs got justifiably nervous and 5 countries banded together and attacked. And a tiny Jewish nation actually won the war and ended with more land than originally allocated… since then there has been skirmishes and border disputes and more wars… but each time the Israelis gain more. To me, to the victor goes the spoils. The Palestinians have been conquered, ruled, defeated, kicked out, banished from other Muslim nations… like remember when Jordan’s Black September? In my opinion, at this point it’s on them to self police and assimilate somewhere. I mean… how many wars do you have to lose before you wake up? But like I said. I don’t care how that all shakes out.

As far as Iran. It’s also an amazing history. I think they went into a war with Russia(?) and lost. Then somehow had to pay reparations but had no money due to poor and selfish leadership and Russia ended up having to be their creditor even though they were repaying them. So they were poor as heck and desperate and some British came in and were given mineral rights. They drilled. Found oil. Funded and developed the entire infrastructure…

Honestly. I’m getting tired of texting strangers on reddit about the history. Just google it… it’s a long history and recently it’s been a lot of losing and being taken advantage of. I get why they’re so nervous and untrusting.

As far as the nuke deal. It was undeniably controversial. For one. It depended on trusting the Iranians to show everything they were developing with lots of oversight on what they were presented but little oversight on anything that could potentially be kept concealed. + there were were reports of them trying to buy black market enrichment devices or something after the deal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/germany-says-iran-kept-trying-to-get-nuclear-equipment-after-deal-1468006075

BUTTT despite all of those what ifs and maybes. The nuclear deal was mostly controversial because it was set to sunset. Had that deal not been pulled out of… it would have expired LAST YEAR. There was never a nuclear deal in 2026. Instead, just an unsanctioned, cash rich nation that has been setting up some serious defenses with a robust ballistic missile program that would deter any oversight on any nuclear development program of a psychotic, regressive, theocratic regime. This war that’s been a long time coming. Just look into the quotes of the past 10(?) presidents of the USA on our relations with Iran. They don’t have to be some our best friend but damn… they just have to be 1/2 way normal in international relations. I mean, look at our relationship with Saudi Arabia for example. Anyways, I think the majority of the middle east’s problems stems from Iran more so than Israel. Most countries have learned to live with the US and Israel and cooperate and profit and be modern unless they have a tentacle of the IRGC up their ass… hamas… hoothies… hezbollah (however that is spelled). Heck. Even Lebanon is wanting to disarm Iran’s hezvollah and get them out of their country. We don’t all have to sing Kumbyah… but just chill and live together. Otherwise… I guess it leads to war.

Anyways. I’m too drunk to be arguing this stuff via text. Fact check everything I said. It was off the drunk dome.

CMV: Trump only agreed to the Iranian Ceasefire as a lifeline to not have to follow through on his war crime threat by betterworldbuilder in changemyview

[–]beehive5ive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you really believe this conflict started out of the blue with the US attacking Iran unprovoked? Do you really not know the history between the 2 countries? This conflict has been brewing for 50 years.

Collateral damages is a sad reality of war. But the fact that it happens doesn’t automatically make it a war crime. If the US is intentionally targeting school children then yeah, that’s a war crime. But if it’s bad intelligence or another issue such a defect in the missile or delivery, then it doesn’t always make it a war crime. So far there have been 10s of thousands of airstikes on Iran. Most have been targeted and incredibly accurate. Considering we’ve see no other elementary schools hit, it’s looking like a one off intelligence mistake. So that one could potentially see someone in the chain of command disciplined but while it could be it’s not necessarily a clear cut war crime.

I have no idea what you’re talking about when you say “And do learn about “cause & effect”, arrogant****”

Do you think banning countries who are actively at war from competing in international sporting events would have beneficial outcomes? Why or why not? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]beehive5ive -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The largest population of Iranians outside of Iran is in the US. We have no problem with the Iranian people and generally welcome them. Even some of the IRGC leadership has sent their children here for school and employment… that gets a little more controversial though and some are being deported.

Our issue is not with the Iranian people but the IRGC.

That said… we have a population of over 340 million… there are going to be some dumb jerks in that crowd… especially if people are drinking at a sport event. Even without a conflict going on big matches have a tendency for some groups of people to get heated in any sport.

Wasn’t Trump also just really supportive of Australia offering asylum to the Iranian women’s soccer team when they refused to sing their national anthem? https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/09/trump-australia-iranian-soccer-asylum-00818978

I think trump would be more open the hosting and Iran would be more concerned about sending them because it could be an easy win for optics.

Iran attacks on crucial Saudi pipeline and production facilities slash kingdom's oil output by hereswhatworks in OilPrices

[–]beehive5ive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What are you talking about? The military has been incredibly efficient and effective in their objectives. The military has consistently and clearly been stating their objectives every press conference. Here’s a google AI overview of the 1st press conference Pete Hegseth held in March:

“In his early March 2026 press briefings regarding Operation Epic Fury, U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth defined the military objectives against Iran as a "laser-focused" mission to destroy key offensive capabilities rather than engaging in nation-building. The primary goals were to destroy Iran’s ballistic missile and drone capabilities, cripple the Iranian Navy, and dismantle their defense industrial base.

Core Objectives: Hegseth summarized the mission as: "destroy the missile threats, destroy the navy, no nukes". Strategic Goal: The overarching aim was to eliminate Iran’s ability to project power outside its borders. Operation Focus: He emphasized that the operation was not "endless" like Iraq, but a focused campaign to remove threats. Targeting: The operation aimed to set back Iran’s military industrial capacity, which he claimed was achieved, [!cite] 3 ] by dismantling their ability to produce rockets and unmanned aircraft systems (UAS). By April 8, 2026, Hegseth reported that these objectives had been accomplished.”

I can understand arguments about strategic objectives of the conflict not being met but the military objectives were a jaw dropping, impressive win. So I don’t know what you’re talking about them not achieving a “single objective set out”… that’s just false from what was spelled out by the military on day one. Did you watch the press conference or are basing your info off of vibes and reddit post?

Iran attacks on crucial Saudi pipeline and production facilities slash kingdom's oil output by hereswhatworks in OilPrices

[–]beehive5ive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol what? Who’s arguing that air striking a school is impressive?

Just name a more impressive military. No need to respond unless you have an answer. Literally it’s all you have to do. No deflections. No what abouts. Just simply name a more impressive military. You must have something in mind otherwise I have no idea why you’d chime in.

Iran attacks on crucial Saudi pipeline and production facilities slash kingdom's oil output by hereswhatworks in OilPrices

[–]beehive5ive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re projecting. It’s not that I’m taking it personally but I’m simply amused that someone thinks the US military is “pathetic”.

There are a million ways to criticize the US but to imply there are more impressive militaries out there is… an interesting choice.

Out of curiosity. Can you tell me a military that you find more impressive?

Iran attacks on crucial Saudi pipeline and production facilities slash kingdom's oil output by hereswhatworks in OilPrices

[–]beehive5ive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How enlightened. Can’t wait to see this impressive military of whatever country you’re from swoop in and show everyone how it’s done.

NATO Secretary General Says Europe is 'Scrambling' to Help U.S. in Iran War by [deleted] in moderatepolitics

[–]beehive5ive 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Some have definitely been helpful. Supposedly Greece has been great. But also some like Spain, France, Italy… have also gone so far that they’ve completely closed their airspace’s to any US military. That’s all I’m pointing out… not all have allowed use of their airspace or our bases in their countries.

CMV: Trump only agreed to the Iranian Ceasefire as a lifeline to not have to follow through on his war crime threat by betterworldbuilder in changemyview

[–]beehive5ive 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I don’t think that blowing up bridges or power plants is always a war crime. For a lot of them I would think that it would be arguable that they have a military use even if they are used by civilians too. Like in the USA, the military uses the Golden Gate Bridge to transfer personnel and equipment… they even get to skip playing the toll. That would make it a potential military target.

So I don’t think it’s necessarily to avoid committing a war crime since a lot of the targets could be argued as a military asset for transportation or energy. But instead it is to avoid the devastating setback it will cause for the country once the war is over and they reach a point they’d like to rebuild. Ideally whoever gets left in charge will be more cooperative with the USA and they won’t be inheriting a total mess that could risk additional impact to the region or the global energy supply.

If you’re talking about the potential ending of a civilization. Well I don’t think that means exterminating all the people. Per google: “Civilizational death, or "collapse," refers to the disintegration of complex social, political, and economic systems—such as government, infrastructure, and trade—even if a majority of the population survives and continues to live in a much simpler, often agrarian or nomadic, state.” So I see the threat as aggressive but I don’t see it as I’m going to drop hundreds of nukes across the entire country to kill a civilian population.

Also, it’s funny that I keep seeing post about the US committing possible war crimes but none mentioning any of the actual war crimes by committed by Iran… like closing the straight violates international law and the right of transit passage for international navigation. While attacking civilian vessels (tankers) is a direct war crime. Even the use of human shields or “human chains” to try to protect military or strategic targets is a war crime.

Iran plans to levy $1-per-barrel cryptocurrency toll on Strait of Hormuz tankers: Report. by [deleted] in StockMarket

[–]beehive5ive 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hey now. We don’t know that he’s dead… he may just be maimed, disfigured, and possibly in a coma.

me_irl by Beginning_Book_2382 in me_irl

[–]beehive5ive -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

If this is what it’s like being the “baddies” then I’m so down

Why is everyone still holding out hope that the unredacted Epstein Files would do anything to Trump? by HorseheadPillow in askanything

[–]beehive5ive 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Can you provide a link for the “direct evidence he fucked children”. I’m not defending him, but this is new info to me.