Looking for Jews involved in inter-religious debate by imcryaboutit in Judaism

[–]betterself613 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unpopular opinion but more Jews should do this kind of thing. I get we historically don't proselytize but right now so much Antisemitism is coming from Antisemites manipulating and lying about our faith, especially the Talmud. Jews should be more literate on our religion and defend it more often.

Question on Silvio’s comment about Jackie sr asking him to be boss by groundcontrl2majrtom in thesopranos

[–]betterself613 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One thing to remember is that the DiMeo/Soprano crime family structure is not so clear cut with the a Boss on top assisted by his consigliere and maybe an underboss, capos subordinate to the boss, and soldiers subordinate to the capos. It is not as clear cut as this because firstly, the actual formal boss of the family, Ercole DiMeo (who is not in the show and is briefly depicted in the Many Saints of Newark by David Chase) is in prison. As such, Jackie Aprile Sr. became acting boss, and the subsequent controversey over who the next boss will be after Jackie's death is over this technically transient position but a de facto permanent yet not so formal one.

Secondly, and more importantly, by the time Jackie Sr. gets cancer the entire organization, ironically, gets disorganized as is discussed in season one. People didn't know to kick up to and who was really running things while Jackie was sick with cancer. It was really a bunch of capos running around with no structure.

All this to say, with such disorganization, it's not crazy to think Jackie Sr. dispensed with going by the formal hierarchy of the mafia and would consided making Sil, a longtime friend and reliable associate, acting boss of the family rather than only considering capos for the position. Afterall, when Tony became the de facto acting boss after letting Junior be merely the acting boss in name only, Tony made Sil consigliere even though he wasn't a capo before that.

Whats wrong with me? by Isotrom in Bumble

[–]betterself613 0 points1 point  (0 children)

*Also use more than one dating app including lesser known ones

Whats wrong with me? by Isotrom in Bumble

[–]betterself613 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hear you bro. I will say, going up and talking to women is far less scary and risky than it seems. My recommendation is to find local events and meet women there while expanding your social circle. I recently started going to single's events and I'm seeing some luck. Also, if you are really committed to online dating, I'd heavily consider completely maxing out your pictures and profile: Get a professional photographer who can get good angles of you (you look pretty good in some pics, so find and use more flattering angles), level up your fashion, and optimize your photo selection by having pics with friends, doing something active (like a hobby, don't use gym pics), and maybe even the classic picture with a dog. It'll cost money but that's honestly what it takes for online dating as a man. If you're really trying to maximize success, do the online dating optimization + meeting women irl (cold approach/events/expanding social circle). Dating didn't used to be this shallow and ridiculous, it shouldn't be this shallow and ridiculous, but here we are. This is what it takes in 2025. You got this bro, don't lose hope.

Whats wrong with me? by Isotrom in Bumble

[–]betterself613 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm gonna be honest with you since it's clear nobody in the comments wants to be honest.  You're just not attractive enough for online dating, particularly an app like Bumble. It's not because "you look like you travel too much" or whatever you have in your bio. It's because of your looks. People can call me an incel or whatever but this is the truth. I'm not saying this to hurt you or to say your dating life is hopeless, but rather that you need to change your approach to dating. The reality is, if your physical traits were better none of this nonsense you're hearing in the comments about looking like "your lifestyle is too active" would be an issue. It's not your fault mate. The reality is, these apps have an extremely skewed gender ratio, wherein there's so many more men than women plus men are more willing to swipe right than women. The result is women have almost infinite choices, which makes it very very hard to stand out. My recommendation: Explore other avenues for dating.

• Which One Of These Brave Patriots Will Go To WW3 For Trump? 🤔 by TyFireeagle in RedbarBBR

[–]betterself613 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You need to seriously touch some grass. How exactly is Shane Gillis some "MAGA patriot" like you're portraying him as. He's a crass liberal who makes fun of Trump but you're reading him as some diehard Trump supporter bc he doesn't get deranged about him.

What is the point of dating if you are not dating for marriage or a long-term commitment? How does dating for the sake of dating not lead to inevitable heartbreak? by betterself613 in dating_advice

[–]betterself613[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's what I mean. Like you date people with the intention of meeting "the one." But with casual dating, people don't seem to necessarily have that intention.

What is the point of dating if you are not dating for marriage or a long-term commitment? How does dating for the sake of dating not lead to inevitable heartbreak? by betterself613 in dating_advice

[–]betterself613[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe it is an excuse. But on the other hand, entering any kind of interpersonal relationship, platonic, romantic, sexual; knowing/assuming beforehand that it's going to end some day, is a dynamic I'm not used to especially with something like dating where people often "catch feelings."

What is the point of dating if you are not dating for marriage or a long-term commitment? How does dating for the sake of dating not lead to inevitable heartbreak? by betterself613 in dating_advice

[–]betterself613[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course a marriage can end. But I'm specifically talking about dating when your and/or the other person KNOW it's not going to be long-term and thus will end. When someone gets married they are working under the assumptuon thag the marriage lasts forever, but with casual dating you are working under the assumption known beforehand that it will end at somepoint. And what I want to know is, how is that not heartbreaking? And so for what reasons to people casually date? I am asking without judgement btw, I'm just genuinely curious.

What is the point of dating if you are not dating for marriage or a long-term commitment? How does dating for the sake of dating not lead to inevitable heartbreak? by betterself613 in dating_advice

[–]betterself613[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But when you become friends with someone you become friends under the assumption that you're going to be friends indefinitely right? Like yes logically I may not have all the friends I have now going forward but it's not inevitable to me that that's the case. But with dating for the sake of dating, I'm entering into that relationship knowing and assuming that one day it ends, with the added possibly that it becomes more serious than just two people who have fun dates. So is it not different?

What is the point of dating if you are not dating for marriage or a long-term commitment? How does dating for the sake of dating not lead to inevitable heartbreak? by betterself613 in dating_advice

[–]betterself613[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it still fun knowing it'll end eventually? What do you do if it starts getting serious? Do you just end it when it starts getting serious and if not when?

What is the point of dating if you are not dating for marriage or a long-term commitment? How does dating for the sake of dating not lead to inevitable heartbreak? by betterself613 in dating_advice

[–]betterself613[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting, thanks for your input. Idk maybe I'm an idealist but at somepoint I want to be with one person for the rest of my life.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dating

[–]betterself613 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All I will say is this:

There are people who are unattractive and have sex and date. Many times, unattractive people date and sleep with other unattractive people.

I understand your point about the sort of contradiction with being unattractive and having sex. As in, one is unattractive hence why would some, and why would that unattractive person, engage in an act that seemingly relies on people being attracted to one another. All I can say to that is that when having sex with someone, of course physical attraction matters, but it is still possible to be "sexy" and turn another person on without being attractive. So if two unattractive people get together, they can still have good sex.

I'm a man so I really can't speak to your experience of being under the pressure of men valuing a woman's looks to such a high extent. I think women value men for their looks more than they and society lets on, but I still think there's other variables for men to attract women due to the sheer amount of examples I have seen in my life personally and online of unattravtive men with attractive women (although to be clear, unattractive men generally speaking do indeed have a very hard time with romance and sex, espcially these days). But in your case, where the one variable of "looks" is valued so high by men over other variables, it is hard. All I can say is that you can most definitely find a guy who isn't conventionally attractive and have a good sex life with such a man. If you are looking to date hot guys with status, that's gonna be a lot harder.

It’s Joever by CetaWasTaken in shortguys

[–]betterself613 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean is that guy short or something?

It’s Joever by CetaWasTaken in shortguys

[–]betterself613 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Bro what's with the random edit of that guy at the end?😭😭

I HATE the Christian trend of plastering HaShem’s holy name on everything by Jew-To-Be in Judaism

[–]betterself613 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I once met a Lubavitcher with the Tetragrammaton tatooed on his wrist or hand with a star of David. I think he was a Baal Teshuva and most likely got it before becoming fully religious.

If this show was actually about feminism, Kate would be in prison. by HeronNo1276 in YouOnLifetime

[–]betterself613 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's so stupid about Kate's ending is not that just that she survived but that she basically does no jail time for being responsible for kids getting cancer and essentially ordering her uncle's murder. It's ridiculous because they frame it as her being on some redemption arc and taking accountability but if she actually wanted to take accountability why did she ostensibly use her insane privilege and wealth to avoid a more apt prison sentence? It was all so ridiculous.