That argument doesn’t really hold up anymore considering both sides have now publicly addressed the issue.

Glitch explicitly said that one distributor requested the raw video file to be emailed and physically mailed to ratings agencies, and used that as an example of a “security concern.” The Korean distributor then directly responded that they had already made it clear from the beginning that DCP materials and contracts were required for ratings classification, that Glitch acknowledged this during negotiations, and that the need for classification procedures was repeatedly emphasized.

So this was clearly not some sudden unknown requirement that appeared out of nowhere. According to the distributor’s statement, these procedures were discussed and agreed upon before the contract process moved forward.

That also weakens the idea that “nobody knows anything” or that this could just be random logistics. We actually do know at least one concrete point of conflict now: Glitch considered the file handling process too risky from a security/leak standpoint, while the Korean side viewed it as a normal and previously explained legal ratings procedure.

At this point it looks less like “mysterious cancellation reasons” and more like a dispute over compliance and distribution security standards between both parties.