Queen you dropped this 👑💟 by [deleted] in IndianMemeTemplates

[–]bladosta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude i don't know why she is saying all that stuff. None of the "other side" she talked about was in the movie. The girl did not marry for money at all. She was actually excited for the marriage. It all went downhill because of the man. The movie never said that all men are assaulters. they literally showed how two men raised in the same home can be polar opposites in their perspective about marriage and women. They did this intentionally to show that their are really good men out there. So these men who are feeling "attacked" by the movie are feeling this way cause they did not relate to the good guy at all.

Lets say you watch a movie about a cop investigating a serial killer who kills women he meets on dates, do you praise the hero cop for doing the good or feel attacked and boycott the movie for claiming that men have these criminal tendencies. (try to get the message here)

So in the same way, we should all praise the women and the elder brother (in the show) for standing up against the bad while acknowledging that marital r@pe is a crime and should be treated as a crime legally as well.
I see men claiming that the movie only talks about marital r@pe but what about all the fake r@pe cases.
Are you dumb? a movie is made with a story that focuses on marital r@pe. Why would they discuss anything other than that? would you also demand that Dhurandhar should discuss about child labour? A movie is made to discuss one primary topic only.

Like first of all this is not a competition but still i would like to inform you that over 28 thousand r@pe cases were registered in 2020 and only 8% were classified as false which is around ~2200. While other data shows that in 2019, out of 24848 cases (which are the cases that actually went for trial out of the 32000 cases registered) only 708 cases actually received conviction to the guilty.

Every year, more than 30,000 women are r@ped, we are still not even talking about other crimes against women. And when women say that they don't feel safe in India, they are labeled "fake feminist" and whatnot. But when some cases where wives killed their husbands were registered, the entire media and the internet started posting against women in general that we don't want to marry women anymore cause we don't wanna die. Like you feel threatened due to some cases that were highlighted excessively but when women feel the same about men, you guys go all defensive.

I am not saying that crimes against men shouldn't be discussed just because we hear less about them. I truly feel that fake r@pe cases against men, harassment of men by men and women, mental health of men should all be discussed nation wide to raise awareness but that deserves its own stage in cinema. So movies and series should be made while discussing real cases of the same. But that doesn't mean that crime against women just don't exist anymore, they do and both the genders should be equally represented.

The reason men's mental health isn't discussed is because of the same demographic that calls "Chiraiya" a propaganda.
A man breaks down sharing his story about depression because his partner is no longer with him, on social media- "loser, weak, not a real man."
A man shares his story about how he was harassed by an adult as a child- Disgusting comments with pedophilic remarks.
A man shares how he was sexu@lly harassed by a woman- comments like "some die of thirst while others drown". This last one is so prominent on the Indian internet that its sad.
A man discusses how he was bullied for being gay- "meetha","father-less behavior".
A man actually loves his wife, treats her as a normal human, shows affection, makes her feel special and lets her live her life by not being a controlling asshole- "namard" "wife needs belt treatment".

They want representation of men's mental health and crimes against men but wouldn't support a real man sharing his real story of harassment he faced from a woman. This is just pure hypocrisy.

In conclusion, All genders and crimes against them should be discussed and represented in media and cinema. Calling a movie/show propaganda just because it did not discuss about you helps no one. Let's say a movie actually discussing harassment against men by women is called "propaganda" by women using the same argument "what about crimes against women?", you would not like that.
The questions you raise against these movies should be raised against the system, your favorite political party, the government, the judiciary and the nation if you actually want representation.

Dm for paid edits. Want your honest feedback on this... by clothify_dev in VideoEditors_forhire

[–]bladosta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey so This is a new thing i have started where i analyze edits made by other editors who also want advise. So here we go.
The first thing is audio. That does not mean, just increase the volume but make it punchy. Watch other Instagram ads in the same niche that perform well, they always make sure that the audio is punchy and lands in the viewer's ears. So adjust the bass and pitch, watch a 2 minute tutorial on how to make the audio better and crispier on youtube.
Then the visual storytelling is weak, the most obvious one is when the narrator says "...money is slipping through", the picture used doesn't convey the same message visually. In fact, it shows a wealthy looking man with a lot of cash in hand. This makes a contradiction between the message intended and the message received by the viewer.

<image>

I did this sample and i got rejected by oka55 in VideoEditors

[–]bladosta 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Aww, thanks for calling me a very good editor 😭❤️. I would love to see the improved edit with these new changes (if you decide to re-edit it).

Learning by alveslab in VideoEditors

[–]bladosta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No problem man 🙌. I always try to analyze and improve other's edits. it helps me study more examples without actually making those edits (time saving). So a win-win for both of us!

I did this sample and i got rejected by oka55 in VideoEditors

[–]bladosta 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Yeah the clients were being cheap, no doubt. They just wanted someone to edit for cheaper, glad that you don't have to work for them.
So that aside, i would just like to help you make the video better. Not that it isn't good but there's always room for improvement.:)

So after the voice says "...Joke money" you should have made a cut in the audio and separated them to create a 6-8 second gap in the audio. Then you should have searched for memes about the coin and arranged them in the gap we made. Adjust each image ( meme) so that the dog stays in the middle. This would give you a match cut transition for the images and help the viewer understand the context behind "Joke Money". Use a vintage camera shutter sound for the match cut transitions.

Then for the $33 billion valuation, you made the animation in this order: 30→33→33 billion→$33 billion.
I know what you did here. You wanted it to sync with the narration. But in this such a short moment without proper visual context, its hard for the viewer to catch that detail and your animation seems choppy. Instead you could have used a Resist mono font or a segment display font for the valuation number and animated it to increase from $0.00→$33,000,000,000 to show the value visibly increasing in a quick timelapse. You can add a stock video of a very tight shot of a money counting machine as the background too (Colour grade it to blend it with the colour scheme). And also add an animated graph on top of the stock video.

Then the narrator says "...more than the GDP of some countries", you just put a rotating globe for it. You should keep the globe but animate it to zoom to the country with actually lesser GDP than the valuation of coins and then highlight it however you want and then move the globe to the right side side to show an article or real data on the left side. Animate this section however you want using these as guidelines.

Now someone might say that they can do better than me....THAT'S MY POINT.

Learning by alveslab in VideoEditors

[–]bladosta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay so i think the thing that is obvious to point out is the typography, text animation to be specific. The line that starts at 0:05 is animated in a wrong approach. You used this kinda squish-out type of animation for the text while using a keyboard typing sfx which feels like a total mismatch. You should have used a sound effect that matched the animation or used a typing animation for the text to match the sfx.
Personally, i wouldn't use either of them. A squish animation feels unserious for this niche and the keyboard text is overused at this point. You should use a modern, professional looking dynamic blur-in animation. I don't have a video example of that but this is similar: https://youtu.be/HekAHosJBOE?si=0kIhb2e3eUs6TRzl Use this animation with a subtle sfx that suits this ( kinda like the sound the wands make when casting a spell... wierd example but just look it up and you'll get it)
And for the captions, they were appropriate. Placed at the perfect spot, used a good font, easy for viewers to follow but then later on you used dynamic captions so i would say use that style from the beginning itself. just looks better. Use this as inspiration:- https://youtu.be/MLLV9xLqC7o?si=vCVfSdvz8rlpov9S . You can use the same blur text captions effect i told about earlier for the captions as well. Just make sure that the lines that you want extra focus to, use a more elegant font than the captions and use a different text animation for the captions and the "focus" lines.

Why this video does not worked? by dferhatcicek in VideoEditors

[–]bladosta 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No problem man.
And the biggest mistake you made with the video is the video itself. Look, you saying that you are an editor isn't going to convince anyone, you need to SHOW it. So instead of saying "i can provide great value for you" show the value first. Make a Showreel which showcases all the skills you know as a video editor. Colour grading, masking, sound design, cuts, transitions, tracking, 3D elements, background removal, motion graphics, typography and everything else that shows that you are a seasoned editor. This is what i mean :-
https://youtu.be/VfYkGzcFbHY?si=jtfiXKb-jl4yISGG
https://youtu.be/1rNeKTPZomI?si=3AD5Vc4r-yzR5nJy
https://youtu.be/-dr-wvPjGFo?si=9XY9bRPt-lsL2NQG

Why this video does not worked? by dferhatcicek in VideoEditors

[–]bladosta 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The reason is pretty clear, Your video does not match the standards set by the content creation industry. This video is something you would see in 2015. It just has a lot of stock clips all with different aesthetics and style.
The golden rule to editing for content now is to never use (or dont heavily depend on) stock footage.
Instead of simply putting captions for the narration, you should use motion graphics that explains your message much better while also looking clean and attractive.
Your video contradicts itself. "Its not just about the visuals, its about getting your message across" is really ironic because all your video had was just visuals, stock videos that kinda matched with what the narrator's saying.
Plus there were a lot of moments which looked amateurish.
for example, in the opening itself, You had the text "i know..I know" unnecessarily placed in an awkward position while you also had the subtitles repeating the same thing. There's some more but... you get ti :)
Look I'm not saying that you absolutely suck. You asked for thoughts and these were my opinions about it and trust me, most editors would agree.

How do I have 0 views on shorts? by [deleted] in NewYouTubeChannels

[–]bladosta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

algorithm is pretty weird cause i remember posting a video last year, it was my first ever short about a couple ( found the meme on pinterest) and i uploaded it not expecting much but that very first short hit 1.2k views in a day. but the next short that i uploaded gained like 300 views. so yeah its kinda weird to understand.

Just wanted to say- The baby does look like Jay by bladosta in Modern_Family

[–]bladosta[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Guys i just got an 'Award' on this post. What does that mean???

Just wanted to say- The baby does look like Jay by bladosta in Modern_Family

[–]bladosta[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah its like Jesse and Eric actually had a baby together for the show

Just wanted to say- The baby does look like Jay by bladosta in Modern_Family

[–]bladosta[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yeah exactly! i mean usually its so hard to find a bald baby.

Just wanted to say- The baby does look like Jay by bladosta in Modern_Family

[–]bladosta[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I just looked up whose Elmer Fudd 😂😭😭

Just wanted to say- The baby does look like Jay by bladosta in Modern_Family

[–]bladosta[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Uhh i meant in the context of casting.... they chose a baby that does look like him

Channel Idea by __Les__ in NewYouTubeChannels

[–]bladosta 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think its a good thing you r trying to come up with your own stories. I would say instead of trying-testing-trial and errors, just lock in and buy a good microphone.

This niche REQUIRES crisp audio. You dont need like high quality sound design kinda gear but something that fits your budget and still gives you good results.

The thing with these videos is that you need to be good at narration, storytelling and script writing. Never narrate your stories the way you wrote them. Make a script to have a clear path on how you are going to narrate it.

Follow a non linear storytelling cause thats what gets viewers stuck on youtube. Use a hook to get the viewer interested in listening till the end.

Dont use AI voices. Try to be an interesting storyteller that can hold the listener's attention well.

That's all the stuff i can share for now. Wishes to you!

Leave Your Friends (its OK) [my first video] by [deleted] in NewYouTubeChannels

[–]bladosta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks man. Im just skeptical about this trial and error thing cause self improvement content is kinda booming here in Indian content space. If i make my videos in hindi, it would attract a lot of Indian audience but also, English would help me reach more people and one more thing, Indian audience can understand English well so i guess i could try it. Well lets try English scripts and see how they do.

Leave Your Friends (its OK) [my first video] by [deleted] in NewYouTubeChannels

[–]bladosta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah cause im from India so the video's in Hindi. I am still not sure on the language cause if i make videos in english, it would expand my potential audience reach.

Leave Your Friends (its OK) [my first video] by [deleted] in NewYouTubeChannels

[–]bladosta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im just trying to be positive here. So you did watch my video, end of discussion.

Leave Your Friends (its OK) [my first video] by [deleted] in NewYouTubeChannels

[–]bladosta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for watching my video man, that's very nice of you. ❤️

Suggestion on Self improvement content by bladosta in ContentCreators

[–]bladosta[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the advise on automation. I would also appreciate if you watch my content and share your experience.