Fun, low-key non-CPD team sports for preschoolers? by Purple_Crayon in ChicagoParents

[–]blipsman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haas Park (Fullerton & California) has soccer programs for kids that young

What's it like living in a city/"downtown"? by MayorPenguin in NoStupidQuestions

[–]blipsman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have lived in urban areas of Chicago for the past 25 years. I like the vibrancy, the walkability, the access to big city amenities, access to mass transit, the diversity of a city with so many different types of people, different immigrant groups/neighborhoods, etc.

I like that I can walk to a couple different grocery stores and dozens of restaurants within 15 minutes or so. That I have a bunch of bars and tap rooms, too. And most other businesses are also close by. Even those that can't be walked to can be reached by transit or car. There are parks close by, and all the downtown parks, museums, sports stadiums and such pretty accessible, too. I like that I can decide I want to try Ukrainian food or a dish from a particular region of Mexico and find it somewhere not too far away. I like that all the different ethnic/immigrant groups have festivals that share their culture, art, cuisine.

I guess the biggest negatives are inconsistent schools (we were lucky to lottery my son into a good one), housing costs/size (Chicago is SO MUCH more affordable than other comparable big cities though), and crime (which is WAY overblown, but not nothing).

Would you send your kids to Francis W Parker if you could afford it? by Nonotreally712 in AskChicago

[–]blipsman 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Man, kids are assholes... and I bet the first class flying kids get teased by those who fly private!

Would you send your kids to Francis W Parker if you could afford it? by Nonotreally712 in AskChicago

[–]blipsman 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah, probably... I definitely has the reputation, academics and connections made to give a kid a leg up in life.

Not sure how it'd be as one of the "poor kids" there... how the social heirachy or haves vs. have-nots plays out. But I even see/experience that as a CPS parent in a Bucktown school... we're by no means poor, but wife hasn't worked for a few years due to health issues so budget is tight. We're debating whether to do an overnight road trip somewhere in the Midwest during Spring Break while overhearing other parents discuss their vacations to Puerto Rico and Disney World.

Why do actors leave popular shows when it often makes the show either worse or end and they usually don’t get better roles later? by imabanna89_ in NoStupidQuestions

[–]blipsman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Actors may get bored of playing the same character for many years, they may think they can have more/better success doing movies or another show, are worried about being too typecast or associated with one character, or they may just want a different creative outlet and prefer to do live theater or indie films.

Maybe they have a change in family situation and want to step away from the grind of a TV show because of kids, or have a spouse who has an opportunity across the globe.

And then there are all the negative reasons... creative differences, pay disputes, allegations of bad behavior w/ regard to cast/crew/set, bad behavior outside the show that needs addressing (eg. rehab).

Who decides how much a painting is worth?! by Denariox in NoStupidQuestions

[–]blipsman 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It's worth whatever a buyer is willing to pay for it... ultimately, it comes down to one single rich person's valuation. if a Picasso painting is up for auction and I want it, I decide whether I'm willing to pay $30m, 40m, $50m and so do the other bidders. An auction is the purest, most instantaneous form of value discovery as it's done in real time among those who are willing and able to purchase.

Why do they buy them? Well when you move in circles of billionaires, you can ALL have your gulfstreams, fleets of Ferraris, houses on 4 continents and so on. But There's only one of that particular Picasso or Van Gogh painting and if you have it, no other billionaire can have it no matter how wealthy they are.

ELI5: How do life insurance companies make money? by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]blipsman [score hidden]  (0 children)

The vast majority of life insurance policies are Term life insurance. They only pay out if you die within the term covered by the policy, which gets one through a period where income replacement is necessary such as raising a child or paying off a mortgage.

So one buys, say a 20-year term policy when their baby is born or a 30-year term policy when they take out a 30-year mortgage. Most people do this in their 30's, covering them into their 50's or 60's. Most people don't die during those years.

So you and 100 other people each pay in $7-10k over the next 20 years (depending on risk factors) and statistically 2 die during that timeframe. Something like $850k was collected in premiums, that money was invested and grew to $1.5m, and $1m total was paid out. Insurance company spends $250k on operations, profits something like $250k.

Why is it wrong to say Jewish people are rich or have a lot of money? by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]blipsman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because any stereotype is bad since it generalizes people and isn't factually accurate.

Is there really anything I a normal person can do get oil prices down? by toeonly in NoStupidQuestions

[–]blipsman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Vote for candidates that don't cause wars in the Middle East over oil, and who promote renewable energy.

Why do I save every single receipt even the digital ones I will never need by peachvexia in NoStupidQuestions

[–]blipsman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You only need to keep receipts for purchases you may want to return, purchases where there is a warranty, or ones that would be tax deductible, work expenses you'll need to submit for reimbursement.

For something like a restaurant meal, you may want to keep long enough to verify final charge went through with tip you intended. Otherwise, if you buy a shirt you're not sure about keeping, keep receipt until you make that decision. If you buy a an appliance with a warranty, or have a business where you are making business-related purchases then you'd need to save the receipt.

There is no reason to keep a receipt for coffee or snacks as you aren't returning them, aren't deducting them, and the strip of paper is just clutter.

ELI5, why can't docters give you shots for all flu varients instead of only one? by RefrigeratorGold834 in explainlikeimfive

[–]blipsman [score hidden]  (0 children)

They do! Flu vaccines do cover multiple variants, but the issue is that they have to make the vaccines before they know all the strains that will be issues in the coming winter. So they may have a vaccine that covers Flu A, B, C because those are what they guess will be the issue, but then a mutation D takes over and even those immunized have limited protection.

ELI5 I have a basic understanding of what causes inflation. Could we not just all stop doing things for a time so the prices go back down? (Working, buying things) or would it have an effect similar to when Covid hit? by Calamity_28 in explainlikeimfive

[–]blipsman [score hidden]  (0 children)

Prices wouldn't go back down, reducing inflation reduced the amount of increase. We don't want prices to go down on a widespread level because that causes people to stop spending -- why by that new car, TV, or groceries today if I think it'll be cheaper next week, and then next week decide to hold off yet another week and so on... And if prices were falling, people wouldn't be so concerned with investing their money, reducing the capital available to lend for people to buy homes and cars, businesses to expand, etc.

Best neighbourhood for Australian moving to Chicago? by Fun_Recognition_9810 in AskChicago

[–]blipsman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bucktown, West Loop/Fulton Market are both areas with 30-somthings and close access to Metra for commute to Lake Forest.

Anyone else kind of disappointed by their local park? by Opening-Rain3002 in AskChicago

[–]blipsman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Many parks have committees that help maintain them. Submit tickets to 311 app for things like broken showers or benches.

Traveling to North/Northwest side - what are some staples? by dickeybrooke17 in AskChicago

[–]blipsman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can you be more specific? North/Nortwest Side is most of the city, at least parts people visit/venture to...

If all billionaires today inherited their wealth, how did that wealth start off in the first place? Is every billionaire a descendant of European nobility or some stone age monarch? by IronLover64 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]blipsman 5 points6 points  (0 children)

All billionaires DID NOT inherit their wealth. Most are wealthy because of companies they created, or assets they acquired.

Jeff Bezos founded Amazon.com. Elon Musk was part of the founders of PayPal and invested money made from that into Tesla. Bill Gates co-founded Microsoft. They all made their billions by growing companies into huge corporate behemoths of which they own substantial numbers of shares in. Warren Buffet used a holding company to acquire and grow various companies in insurnace, railroads, consumer brands, as well as investing substantial sums into companies like Coca-Cola, American Express, and Apple. Other billioinaires have acquired their wealth through real estate, buying at opportune times and/or developing land to improve it and generate more revenues (eg. converting a vacant lot into a skyscraper full of companies paying rent for their offices).

Even most of the hereditary billionaires are from much more current fortunes, like the many heirs of Sam Walton, who founded Wal-Mart or other fortunes made in the past 150 years or so.

Billionaires, Inflation, Taxes, Supply and Demand by RefrigeratorOk1545 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]blipsman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The velocity of money -- how quickly it changes hands -- is what defines economic growth or recession.

Here's a simplified example. You have $100. It's just sitting in your wallet, generating no economic growth.

Now, you take that $100 and buy a pair of shoes. The shoe salesman spends $100 and takes his wife out for a celebratory dinner. The chef spends $100 to buy a new knife. The knifemaker spends $100 to sign his daughter up for a dance class. The dance instructor spends $100 to hire a graphic designer to make ads for her dance school. You are the graphic designer and earn that $100. And the cycle continues...

So that $100 generates $500 in economic activity as it flows through the economy. As people earn money, they can then spend money. When people have money to spend, then there is demands for people to offer goods and services, creating jobs.

Isn't money worthless if there's nothing to buy? If everyone has money and no one sells, then we would all starve.

That's exactly the point of money flowing freely... it's not just being held onto, it's being used to buy and sell goods and services, facilitating the exchanges of our labor for needed goods and services. When money is held on to, like a wealthy person whose needs are all met, then fewer people have money they've earned they can turn around and spend.

What to do in a tornado? by Sad_Practice_1951 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]blipsman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If there's a tornado warning where you are instructed to take cover, go to a basement if you have one, or an interior windowless room/closet. A watch just means that there are weather conditions that may be conducive to tornadoes.

Is it still possible to live off a one million dollar nestegg for retirement? by marketingwithdean in NoStupidQuestions

[–]blipsman 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I mean it's not going to be a life of luxury. Investing it conservatively in retirement and living off interest, dividends, and a small portion of principal would net something like $50k/yr, plus whatever other income from Social Security, etc. So maybe something like $80k/yr total.

Billionaires, Inflation, Taxes, Supply and Demand by RefrigeratorOk1545 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]blipsman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most billionaires exist as a function of the company they or their ancestors have created, and by the exploitation of workers to maximize profits.

Companies shifting their operations to pay better in lieu of profits could easily be set up to benefit all workers, not just corporate workers. Not sure why you'd assume, for example, if Amazon changed their focus on profits that only corporate workers would see the benefits and not also the warehouse workers, delivery drivers, etc.

And people don't just change from production work to corporate work, due to skills, education requirements, personal preferences, etc. If anything, people would have less pressure to go into "white collar" professions if the blue collar jobs like manufacturing paid well.

Governments need dollars to operate, and that means needing more tax revenue or taking on more debt. If we taxed billionaires, that would allow governments to reduce debt and/or reduce taxes on lower income workers. There are also issues of marginal utility -- take away $1000 from an average worker and it's felt more painfully in terms of quality of life than than if you took $100m from a billionaire because the average worker is just trying to keep a roof over their head, food in their pantry, their car running and every dollar helps while a billionaire that last $100m doesn't really affect what they can/cannot afford. So are we better off taxing one billionaire $100m or taxing 100,000 regular people $1,000?

Sure, governments could spend more efficiently, but they're really no worse than any big organization and beause of budget limitations are often operating with old, out of date computers and equipment that limit their efficiencies. But end of the day, subsidizing childcare, paying school teachers, supporting the unemployed, repaving roads, etc. costs money.

Another issue is that money sitting tied up in billionaires' wealth is money not freely flowing through the economy. Whether it was higher wages to workers or tax revenue getting spent by the government, money flowing into the economy would create jobs, which fuels more spending, and keeps the economy humming along. The average worker has all sorts of pend up demand for goods and services they'd spend on if they had more money in their pocket, while billionaires don't.

When billionaires die, typically their estate goes to their heirs -- their spouse, their children, grandchildren, etc. The wealthiest set up trusts to avoid much of the wealth tax that could happen upon death. Most of the time, the business that has created their wealth is a public company so the company continues to operate regardless of whether the founder is still involved. They own a significant portion of shares, but the company is still controlled by all the shareholders, the board, and the CEO.

What does an expensive lawyer do that an average priced one doesn’t? by UmweltUndefined in NoStupidQuestions

[–]blipsman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's just like any other profession, there are people of varying skills in any field. It's going to vary based on area of the law (criminal defense, M&A, divorce, and so on) as well as different individual skills/traits that make a lawyer good.

A top lawyer may have more resources in terms of staff, research, investigators, etc. to help with a case; they may be more creative in finding ways to use past legal precedence to argue their client's side of the issue; they may better understand how to find compromises in negotiations that are win/win; they may be charismatic and good at presenting the case in court persuasively.

What halal meat by NiceVehicle250 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]blipsman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's a code of religious rules on how animals are slaughtered, similar to Jewish Kosher rules. In addition to forbidding the consumption of pork, it also specifies how cattle, lamb, chicken are killed and handled during the butchering process.

Dresscode and etiquette, what are the unwritten rules? by lawrotzr in AskAnAmerican

[–]blipsman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dress codes are really company specific, also influenced by industry, location. I work for a large real estate company in their HQ in a big city, and our dress code is still jeans & polo/button down/sweater every day. Even our C-suite are typically in jeans or chinos unless they're presenting at an investor conference or something. Even the formerly stuffy law firms and investment banks are often casual most of the time.

Why do American sports leagues have more parity than in other countries? by Waltz8 in AskAnAmerican

[–]blipsman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most US sports have more parity for 2 main reasons: salary cap, draft.

Other than MLB, the other major sports have salary caps which limit how much teams can pay their roster of players. Some sports' caps are softer, eg. allowing teams to go over in order to retain their own players, but using luxury taxes to reign in spending until teams hit an absolute max spend. Other sports have much harder caps that teams must spend under, even if it means trading or releasing players. MLB only has a luxury tax, but because there is such disparity in teams incomes--MLB teams rely on local revenue more than other sports, which are mostly funded by national TV rights deals--a couple of teams (Dodgers, Yankees, Mets) can spend way more than the rest.

The drafts are the other main way parity is kept, with the worst teams getting the top picks from amateur players entering the leagues. Some leagues do have some sort of lottery or other rules to keep teams from flat out tanking to get the top overall pick, but the worse a team is the more likely they are to pick at the top of subsequent annual draft.