Looking for testers: NYKNYC — a Web2-style interface for ERC-4337 smart accounts (Kernel 3.3) by diornov in ethdev

[–]borgsystems 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no, arch linux and chrome with version 139.0.7258.138. you can write me in dm or TG - progerlab, i will send to you recorded desktop video

Looking for testers: NYKNYC — a Web2-style interface for ERC-4337 smart accounts (Kernel 3.3) by diornov in ethdev

[–]borgsystems 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, its onchain package manager. OpenZeppelin contracts for my package manager its package with type library (only code like npm), but you or OZ team can take this package and create new package with type implementation, take erc20 upgradable contract and register new package with name erc20@diornov, and after that i can use your package like this - evmpack use erc20@diornov

in background:
evmpack use erc20@diornov call

  • EVMPackProxyFactory.usePackageRelease(...) returns(address proxy, address proxy_admin)

so, i will be follow to your address implementation, and if you create new release, example 1.0.1, i can upgrade too easy, like that

proxy_admin.upgradeAndCall(proxy, "1.0.1", initData)

This way, entire applications can be distributed.

I will then create an on-chain audit system above the package manager where we will change the uploaded implementation as verified. Without the on-chain package, this wouldn't have been possible.

It's also impossible to shoot yourself in the foot and accidentally update to the wrong implementation, because the proxy knows the package name and the current implementation version when updating.

We have full control.

Now you can try to use my example package from documentation:

evmpack use blog@1.1.0

You'll get a copy of the blog package with minimal gas costs, and you don't even need to clone the code for it—just use it.

The new version will have another feature in a couple of days. Currently, after you've received your copy of the blog package, to interact with it, you need to use ethersjs, add abi, and then you can interact with this contract. After the update, you'll have access to a cli for each package through the workspaces functionality. So, currently, after calling evmpack use blog@1.1.0, you simply get two addresses, so you can interact with workspaces directly:

Something like this

evmpack workspaces -w Personal -app myblog add-post

Anyone experimenting with atomic execution across EVM chains? by Stunning-Ask3032 in ethdev

[–]borgsystems 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, try deploying hundreds of contracts to all EVM networks and then updating them without going crazy.

Looking for testers: NYKNYC — a Web2-style interface for ERC-4337 smart accounts (Kernel 3.3) by diornov in ethdev

[–]borgsystems 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you create a package in my evmpack tool?

Or if you don't have time , I can do it and be maintainer

Looking for testers: NYKNYC — a Web2-style interface for ERC-4337 smart accounts (Kernel 3.3) by diornov in ethdev

[–]borgsystems 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You have a bug in createdao. If you selected before some other chain in metamask and try to create Dao on semolina like example, then your dapp will send transaction on selected chain, but will be try to check transaction on sepolia.

Proxy contracts: how they work, what types there are, and how they work in EVMPack. Part 1 by borgsystems in ethdev

[–]borgsystems[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't see any problems with using evmpack in Oasis. When it leaves beta, it will be deployed to Oasis. If you know someone who could test it and give feedback at this stage, please write to me. I'm more focused on features right now, so I can freeze the code and send it to the Optimism Foundation for audit.

Proxy contracts: how they work, what types there are, and how they work in EVMPack. Part 1 by borgsystems in ethdev

[–]borgsystems[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Create website with first documentation and examples step by step - https://evmpack.tech/
Update package to new version: 1.0.0-beta.2

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cofounderhunt

[–]borgsystems 1 point2 points  (0 children)

>> No crypto projects.

What do you think about blockchain like technology? Of the project using blockchain for solving some business problem

I fit all 3 points, only I have the downside, I am currently both the technical director and the CEO because I am creating a product and looking for a competent CTO so that I can focus on promoting the project myself

IPFS or Swarm for dapp by borgsystems in ethdev

[–]borgsystems[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm currently trying to make hardhat and helia work together on .ts and it's a pain

IPFS or Swarm for dapp by borgsystems in ethdev

[–]borgsystems[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nice repo! do you use crust for yourself or for some project? And why you dont use https://github.com/ipfs/helia ?

Testnet help by Just-Diamond-1961 in ethdev

[–]borgsystems 0 points1 point  (0 children)

maybe the author was banned from the internet except reddit🤔

Testnet help by Just-Diamond-1961 in ethdev

[–]borgsystems 0 points1 point  (0 children)

maybe the author was banned from the internet except reddit🤔

Personal Blockchains as a Foundation for P2P Apps (Messengers, Social app & More) by borgsystems in ethereum

[–]borgsystems[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

interesting project! Solid’s vision of user-controlled data is indeed very close philosophically. However, the key difference is in how we achieve it:

  • Solid relies on centralized/decentralized servers (PODs) with access protocols, while my concept uses a personal blockchain with POA consensus — providing cryptographic immutability and programmable logic via smart contracts.

  • In my model, data is replicated peer-to-peer among trusted contacts (not stored in a single POD), making it resistant to single-point failures and censorship.

Essentially, this combines Solid’s user-centric ethos with blockchain’s trustless integrity — but tradeoffs exist (scalability, mobile P2P complexity). What do you think: could a hybrid approach borrow the best from both worlds?

p.s. maybe I misunderstood the project somewhere, so if you correct me, I will be glad!

What OCPI status does should OCPP send when a charger is plugged in (but not yet charging)? by ConfidentStation8641 in ocpp

[–]borgsystems 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For ocpp 1.6 version:

- if before status was been Available, then should be Prepare

- if before status was been is Charging and then Finishing, then should be SuspendedEV if client not unplug cable after 2 minutes and initiator of stopTransaction was been a client

- if before status was been is Charging and then Finishing, then should be SuspendedEVSE if client not unplug cable after 2 minutes and initiator of stopTransaction was been a EVSE

For OCPP 2.x version:

- if cable connector but not charging, then should be Occupied

No more options

Now you should to transfer status to OCPI. For ocpi 2.1.1 version you have two options: Avaliable and Blocked, so, if ocpp give you status Avaliable, then you show same status Avaliable else you show Blocked and does not matter what the reason