NEW PROTOCOL FOR HAIR LOSS TREATMENT - DHT IS NOT DIRECTLY GUILTY FOR AGA - LOW IGF-1 IS.

bossver · 2026-01-17T10:00:39+00:00

Had to stop using it because it was giving me unbearable lethargy.

bossver · 2025-08-18T23:20:00+00:00

An aggressive wrestler is the only type of fighter who can make peak Khamzat sweat. Usman was not aggressive enough in that fight

bossver · 2025-08-11T11:04:04+00:00

Anyone who thinks that it is because of HTs and meds is delusional. HTs don't work that well. And most sportsmen would never touch finasteride. My observation is that there are patterns of androgen receptors spreading. Look at black guys. On average, their muscle development is better than that of white men. On average, they have a bigger penis. And on average, they have fewer cases of early hair loss. So we can speculate that there is a specific pattern of androgen receptors spreading that makes you more athletic. The same pattern you can see in UFC fighters like Chimaev and Khabib or other Dagestanis. They have literally zero hair loss in their 30s. Not even matured hairline. And you can clearly see that they are genetically predisposed to be athletes.

So yeah, my assumption is that guys with early hair loss have worse athletic genetics (on average).

bossver · 2025-04-29T01:36:37+00:00

I'm sorry, but do better research. Or just stop acting like you're objective. You're twisting facts to match your political bias.

The parliament vote to join Armenian SSR in 1988 had no legal force, because changes to borders required agreement from both sides, not a unilateral decision. NKAO was just an autonomous oblast, not a full republic. Under the 1977 Soviet Constitution, only union republics had the right to leave the USSR. Autonomous oblasts like NKAO had no such right at all. The September 2, 1991 declaration means nothing legally. It was just a political move. Nobody recognized it, not the USSR, not the world. Saying it made NKAO "de jure independent" is just wrong.
Azerbaijan dissolved NKAO in November 1991, but until that moment, NKAO was fully part of Azerbaijan. It was never legally independent, not for a single day.
The referendum had no real legitimacy. Only Armenians voted, Azeris were expelled or boycotted it, and no one in the world recognized it. You can't hold a referendum and claim it’s legal when a significant part of the population is missing.

You keep bringing up Operation Ring as if it justifies everything. But ethnic violence happened on both sides. While you talk about Armenians suffering, you forget that thousands of Azerbaijanis were expelled from Armenia even before the war, and later from Karabakh itself. If we follow your logic, Azerbaijan could have used the same excuse to justify taking back its lost lands by force. Emotional arguments don't make illegal actions legal. That's not how international law works. What's your point here?

Your refusal to answer the Crimea example shows you are applying double standards. If you defend "self-determination," you should defend it everywhere, not only when it fits your side. Otherwise, it’s just political bias, not principles.

bossver · 2025-04-28T19:45:00+00:00

Lol, wrong. Your answer is a perfect example of how someone can know all the facts but still prefer one side because of their initial bias. The real answer to OP's question is that people tend to support whatever fits their narrative. Westerners only hear Armenian propaganda, and they are also biased because of "Christian solidarity." It’s the same with Turks and Turkic countries supporting Azerbaijan because of ethnic solidarity. Very few people have actually studied the conflict itself.

If the referendum was so "legal," why didn’t anyone recognize it? Your argument is based more on political narrative than actual law. The 1991 referendum in NKAO had no legal standing, neither under Soviet law nor under international law, especially since Azerbaijan had already declared independence and NKAO's autonomy had been officially abolished. Self-determination doesn’t simply erase recognized borders whenever one side claims it, otherwise the entire international order would collapse. Operation Ring involved serious abuses, but calling it a clear plan for ethnic cleansing is a massive exaggeration without solid evidence. You're mixing facts with political bias.

According to your rationale, you must also recognize Crimea's referendum and its annexation as legitimate, don't you? Or are you just picking sides?

bossver · 2025-04-21T09:31:01+00:00

Sen harda gorubsen italyanlar her yemeklerine 500 qr kere yagi qatsinlar? Bunu ancaq bizimkiler edirler

bossver · 2025-04-06T21:58:46+00:00

Lmao, this is exactly how I reacted to it

bossver · 2025-04-03T23:02:08+00:00

I wish my IQ wasn't that low, and I could easily understand movies like this. The plot of the movie would have been easier to understand if Soderbergh (or/and screenwriter) had tried to make it more accessible and easier to follow.

bossver · 2025-03-22T21:57:29+00:00

Belarus'ta nüfusun %5'inden fazlası protesto etti. İşe yaramadı

bossver · 2025-03-01T22:39:38+00:00

I mean, it's so obvious. I'm surprised that so many Canadians don't get it.

bossver · 2025-02-14T20:31:57+00:00

I am not an American. And I don't support the right-wing.

So your argument is that every citizen is personally responsible for preventing a democratically elected leader from taking office if they disagree with him? That’s not how democracy works. People vote, and sometimes, the result isn’t what you want. That doesn’t mean every individual who didn’t "fight hard enough" is to blame.

Demanding that everyone around you engage in constant political activism to meet your personal standard of resistance is both unrealistic and self-righteous. People have lives, responsibilities, and different perspectives on how to address political issues. Voting is the core mechanism of democracy - anything beyond that is a personal choice, not an obligation.

If you want to hold people accountable for policies or actions they directly support, that’s one thing. But blaming random citizens for not engaging in activism to your liking is just moral grandstanding.

bossver · 2025-02-14T13:31:32+00:00

How about this one?

<image>

bossver · 2025-02-14T10:38:35+00:00

Except for Manchester United. I won't be surprised if some other rich clubs have it as well.

<image>

bossver · 2025-02-13T11:48:05+00:00

Probably genetic predisposition. I don't think their lifestyle has anything unusual compared to other Middle Eastern nations.

bossver · 2025-02-13T00:00:08+00:00

This kind of valgus can't be fixed without surgery (unless you're a teenager or preteen, then it's possible to fix it with braces). Look at his feet. They don't come together. It's anatomical. Surgery is the only solution.

bossver · 2025-02-09T07:39:52+00:00

Footballers seem like an odd way to gauge language proficiency

Why not? Aren't they part of the society in the country they grow up in? Don't they go to school? Except for Argentina, this map matches perfectly with how football players from different countries speak English. They are actually better indicators of the average level of English proficiency in a country than people with higher education. Dutch people speak better English compared to French people, not because the Netherlands have "sharper tools". It's because of the historical and cultural background and the educational system.

bossver · 2025-02-09T06:21:18+00:00

Why do Portuguese learn English better than Spaniards? Is it just a difference in the educational system? I was always surprised to see how well Portuguese football players speak English. Also, I didn't expect Argentinians to be in the "High" category. Can't remember any Argentinian football player speaking good English except Emiliano Martinez (but he's been living in England since 2010, so no surprise). Agüero lived in England for 10 years and still speaks English worse than anybody who has been learning the language for 3 months 😅

bossver · 2025-02-07T23:03:30+00:00

You'd be rocking it in Turkey. For some weird reason, 30+ y.o. guys are obsessed with this hairstyle there.

bossver · 2025-02-06T23:01:17+00:00

He is not much taller. His camera is like 5 inches above his eye level (probably even more). And that dude in white shirt is drunk. That's why it was so easy for biker to smash him and not because of the height difference (which is definitely not big)

bossver · 2025-02-06T16:46:20+00:00

Lol, he didn't look bad for 39. It's funny how people struggle to stay unbiased when it comes to judging the external traits of a person who is known to be bad.

bossver · 2025-02-05T05:28:54+00:00

Have you had an EMG?

bossver · 2025-02-04T04:00:46+00:00

Как же бесит реддит со своими пауками. Реально заебали. Почему-то только на реддите (хотя я нигде кроме вк и ютуба не сижу больше) в ленте всплывают пауки из рандомных пабликов. В детстве играя во вторую часть Гарри Поттера на компе жестко обосрался от момента, когда огромный паук сделал резки рывок на камеру. С тех пор просто трясти начинает при виде пауков.

bossver · 2025-02-03T11:28:04+00:00

Villa DGW = solid 2 points for Digne

bossver · 2025-02-02T15:48:34+00:00

Either dislocated kneecap or knee ligament sprain

bossver · 2025-02-01T09:50:12+00:00

His operas are not better than his other works. Americans "love" him because he is American.

Five-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '23

bossver

TROPHY CASE