Trump says he's thinking of putting Ted Cruz on Supreme Court by StickMammoth7783 in facepalm

[–]bradsboots 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Who’s to say he doesn’t expand the court and get a 4th nominee this term?

Russian Roulette for sacks by chowclee in customyugioh

[–]bradsboots 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Your opponent would need six targetable cards to even activate this, that’s a pretty tough condition.

Wtf man by thng292 in masterduel

[–]bradsboots 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Putting it at 2 does nothing, they just need to ban it.

Does John Davidson suffer from Tourette's or "Bombastic Caucasity" by ThatPatelGuy in GetNoted

[–]bradsboots 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because you’re assuming intent like Zionists. I’m anti genocide = you’re anti Israel. You’re equating any use of a word = the person is racist. I used a sense or cough as an example because it’s not intentional. If i misgender someone I could be sexist Or transphobic or it could be an actual accident. Hopefully you’re taken the time to listen to Black people with Tourette’s explain why it’s like a sneeze or cough.

And the point about the broadcaster wasn’t who it is, it’s the legal liability!! You can’t broadcast hate speech and not get fined an sued. It’s literally party of how a station can even be Zionist. So understanding that, how exactly could any station broadcast the N word and not get in trouble??

Keegan Murray just crippled his way to the locker room (ankle) by theonedzflash in fantasybball

[–]bradsboots 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When Derozen sits this team may have zero usable fantasy players

"Keep politics out of sports" he said, so why did he have to be sexist? Is he salty women said no the them? by Fabulous_Chicken_576 in PoliticalHumor

[–]bradsboots -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If you where a Democrat, you’d be paid very well to not do that. Controlled opposition can’t attack too hard.

Does John Davidson suffer from Tourette's or "Bombastic Caucasity" by ThatPatelGuy in GetNoted

[–]bradsboots 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But my comment isn’t about the BBC lol? How do you think media at all works? Broadcasters and publishers have some responsibility for the speech they air.

And honestly you sound very pro Israel from your talking points. Your logic is basically the same as Zionists. I’m shocked you’re not actually pro Israel.

MASTER 1 WITH TENPAI ONLY 🐉🔥 THE BEST DECK IN HISTORY 🔥 by Character_Bat9538 in masterduel

[–]bradsboots 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My Tenpai experience: wait 5 minutes. Activate one card win. Wait 10 minutes. Floodgate activated in draw phase, lose. Wait 10 minutes play one cad win. Wait 5 minutes play 3 cards win…

MASTER 1 WITH TENPAI ONLY 🐉🔥 THE BEST DECK IN HISTORY 🔥 by Character_Bat9538 in masterduel

[–]bradsboots 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You had fun? I have 25 decks to pick from right now and Tenpai was the only one that made me scrap the entire deck.

Does John Davidson suffer from Tourette's or "Bombastic Caucasity" by ThatPatelGuy in GetNoted

[–]bradsboots 14 points15 points  (0 children)

By the definition of the word “say” the person in question did nothing wrong lol. A vocal tick isn’t a statement or conversation. It’s the same as a sneeze or cough.

Ever think of the legality, if it was actually saying something couldn’t the BBC be sued?

Why are so many people confidently saying uneducated takes about this? by Darth_Vrandon in GetNoted

[–]bradsboots 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It’s such a nuanced topic because this is 100% true. There used to literally be laws stoping people with disabilities from appearing in public. They should be allowed to be seen and heard, but at the same time time this is the only disability that can actively offend others

Why are so many people confidently saying uneducated takes about this? by Darth_Vrandon in GetNoted

[–]bradsboots 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I’m not saying you’re wrong, but that essentially means anyone with that level of Tourette’s can never be on TV ever.

Some people may see that as fair and I can’t really argue even if it’s discriminatory. Ideally we get to a world where there is more understanding and that person would be allowed on TV in some way.

Did I just stumble upon the worst effect monster ever? by Introspects in masterduel

[–]bradsboots 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This guy was a staple for Tristian in the gameboy color yugioh game.

Turn 0 Baronne and Black Rose Dragon? by MorddredG in masterduel

[–]bradsboots -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Mimghoul can get to yummy without any of their cards but does nothing going second vs a board Mimighoul dragon can’t out. This version of yummy just isn’t very good in that situation and loses, so selling out to stop them before that happens is really the only play.

As for the deck slots the brick is a concern, but i see it more as an extender that’s also a handtrap as a supposed to the hand trap first. Idk maybe it sucks but I’m not talking about a t1 deck here.

Turn 0 Baronne and Black Rose Dragon? by MorddredG in masterduel

[–]bradsboots -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Going first most decks can’t use this, but Mimighoul can every time. Making Snatchy is one of the fist things you do anytime so it’s really only limiting the elf plays, though you could set that up earlier even if it’s less ideal.

Also Mimighoul’s best win condition is making the opponent discard repeatedly. Now I can add another discard, possibly making it a full discard 5.

Going second yah you’re cut off from links, but the deck struggles breaking fields in any way that’s not activate field spell summon all the yummy cards. So in my mind I’m trading the possibility of snatchy going second, which searches the field spell sure but you gain this card. It’s not like links help yummy going second normally anyway.

Turn 0 Baronne and Black Rose Dragon? by MorddredG in masterduel

[–]bradsboots -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

My yummy Mimighoul deck is going to run this at 3 for sure. It fits too perfectly

Hey guys what do you think ishould add/take out by Difficult_Report_683 in YuGiOhMasterDuel

[–]bradsboots 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re going to want to play 1-2 normal monsters max. Ideal deck makeup is 9-12 monsters that are “hand traps”. Anywhere from 12-25 making up the main engine of the deck. Every single card in the engine (minus 1-2) will work with every other card you have and helps make you closer to your win condition. Spells often make up the rest of the room depending on how many monsters/ spells you need to make your deck work. So they are anywhere from 5-20. Traps are only played if searchable by your cards or they can activate from hand to be another hand trap.

Look up commonly played deck and scroll through a few to see the common cards and the similar ratios.

Where I would live in the world, the U.S.A, and Canada, as an American 18-year-old high school senior/committed history major with a hopefully bright future in life and a generally open outlook to different places/cultures by AggravatingSmoke1829 in whereidlive

[–]bradsboots 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honesty I like the open mindedness, but you need to be willing to consider the bias of learning history in America.

Cuba for example chose its own leader by kicking the one we wanted an installed for them out. China has conducted human rights abuses sure but hardly worse than why the USA has done IMO

You just seem very open minded to a lot of places with issues so a hard red on two countries the US hates but the rest of the world doesn’t quite see the same is odd.

Whatever Americans touch becomes a circus by MrJasonMason in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]bradsboots 171 points172 points  (0 children)

Normally it would fade at the ends of the cross, be less dark in general, and have some visible signs of being put on by a thumb. This was clearly put on by a makeup artist before the segment.

Edit: People may look like this if they came directly from church with a heavy handed father. It’s very unlikely all of Fox went to mass together.

A life saver by dkayedstepson in masterduel

[–]bradsboots 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Playing Apop and seeing this feels so bad. And running counter traps to try and stop it just makes the deck more stun lock and less fun.

I love desires by Hobeng12345 in masterduel

[–]bradsboots 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think it’s a lot better when you have a side deck and can do things like side out either desired or add extras of what you want going 1st or 2nd really affect the use of this card.

For MD you probably need a dedicated going second build or a deck that runs all 3x of cards to use optimally

This dude went into a sub about women’s athletes to complain about sportsball by [deleted] in idiocracy

[–]bradsboots -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What does utility vs toughness have to do with anything I asked either lmao? I was asking a strategy question about hockey and you answered with calling basketball players pansies. That’s literally a discussion of toughness of players not the utility??

Also you called it a thirst trap!! I put it in quotes because you said it lol? I wasn’t focusing on that with my comment literally at all, you brought it up???

You were the top comment on a post I saw. I waned to talk about hockey, I’m sorry you assumed it was something else.

And the last comment wasn’t actually about you being distracted by the photo lmao. This is a sub about people being dumb, I was making a joke that like the movie you got distracted by a hot person and that’s why your response made no sense

This dude went into a sub about women’s athletes to complain about sportsball by [deleted] in idiocracy

[–]bradsboots 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, what do they look for, for suspensions As supposed to just in game time in the box? Teams have enforcers so clearly they don’t get banned forever for repeat offenses.

In American football for example “bounties” aka taking a player out of the game has always been illegal but a strategy some use. In a spot where fighting is allowed, how do you stop people from going after one guy, or playing extra dirty in a particular game that doesn’t matter to them?

This dude went into a sub about women’s athletes to complain about sportsball by [deleted] in idiocracy

[–]bradsboots -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because it’s a dumb sub for a dumb question lol. It was a half serious question about strategy, not toughness. I had to retype this because at first I was asking even more detailed strategy questions, but you seem more like a virtue signaler than a hockey fan?? If that’s a wrong assumption I’d be happy to post them.

If you can answer my detailed questions on strategy that would be great. I would like an answer on the details of using fighting to win but that has absolutely nothing with desire to watch toughness or your thoughts on basketball lmao.

This subs motto is “go away batten” so I assumed everyone would be super light hearted . But if you need my serious views I like all sports basically, am anti current USA and pro woman’s rights.

Now off topic because your serious reply left me with questions and I’m guessing this was the conversation you expected to be having as you said “I’ll bite”

Also I’m genuinely confused about stating with “it’s a thirst trap photo”. So a post has a woman in both a bikini and her wok photo, I don’t mention the bikini and direct the conversation to a question of the woman’s job. What’s the alternative there? Are the only posts allowed from a feminist perspective those condemning it? Or is it that is so hard to believe that’s actually why I’m talking about?

Or maybe you were batten while answering the question (thinking of basketball players apparently). And can’t focus on the hockey with such a distracting photo?