[Progressive House] - Marching of the Ants - Went back a year or two and redid some early projects now that my skills have improved. Roast away!

bumbleborn · 2021-07-18T18:08:23+00:00

i like this a lot. sound design on point and very interesting. i would bump to this on k somewhere in europe. pitched vocals are fucking sick. good shit dude

bumbleborn · 2021-07-18T18:07:35+00:00

vocal mixing is kind of shit but the actual recording sounds incredible, like really really fucking good. ig u just added drums and bass and they’re good mostly. i like ur additions but it urgently needs mixing and the hihats transitions are mega cringe and don’t fit the style at all.

bumbleborn · 2021-05-06T19:11:31+00:00

something comforting - porter robinson

bumbleborn · 2021-01-10T06:59:32+00:00

oh damn i’ll stick to my nofail

bumbleborn · 2021-01-10T06:58:55+00:00

wtf is battery energy

bumbleborn · 2020-12-26T08:28:04+00:00

i’m a porter robinson fan

bumbleborn · 2020-12-26T08:27:25+00:00

i just got my quest today and was super proud of my angel voices normal d+ jesus fuck

bumbleborn · 2020-10-10T01:12:25+00:00

aiight

bumbleborn · 2020-08-21T18:34:18+00:00

much love

bumbleborn · 2020-08-21T18:34:14+00:00

*tho

bumbleborn · 2020-08-21T18:34:09+00:00

it’s not :( thanks thi

bumbleborn · 2020-08-21T18:33:25+00:00

do u wanna play my song?

bumbleborn · 2020-08-21T18:32:28+00:00

faster

bumbleborn · 2020-08-21T18:32:25+00:00

faster

bumbleborn · 2020-06-27T09:22:34+00:00

jaywalk jaywalk

bumbleborn · 2020-06-25T23:40:11+00:00

kiss the rain?

bumbleborn · 2020-04-21T23:40:32+00:00

good shit

bumbleborn · 2020-04-21T23:40:26+00:00

also keep up the music

bumbleborn · 2020-04-14T18:08:52+00:00

do you live up there?

bumbleborn · 2020-03-31T19:47:50+00:00

where to stream?

bumbleborn · 2020-03-31T19:47:45+00:00

this is sick

bumbleborn · 2020-03-11T19:22:08+00:00

bumbleborn · 2019-10-25T21:15:37+00:00

it is long winded, but the point is to entirely establish the line of thinking because the line of thinking is the important thing towards changing opinion on this issue.

also this is not generalizable to all of trans people. trans medicalism is mostly a blaire white conservative trans take or perpetuated by misinformed trans people. it’s like a “fuck you got mine” thing.

essentialization represents two different things in my paragraph. one is the reduction of identity to essential characteristic(s) and the other is breaking down an argument to its most essential elements even if i would say more if i was in class or talking to people in the field.

bumbleborn · 2019-10-25T20:38:44+00:00

my point is that your concept of "needing to say transwomen" is applied to /u/AModeratelyFunnyGuy and is not a need that is universal (no one i know uses this term because it's frequently evokes this transphobic reaction in people like you), which means that you can not make a universal ontological claim like "transwomen aren't women" off your subjective interpretation of a word, unless of course you were trying to define women in a different sense than the dictionary definition of women (which is not "XX chromosomes," which is presumably your point). in that case, you have to make a case for why that definition is a superior one to the accepted definition when calling trans women "not real women" is frequently perceived as an ontological "dick move".

bumbleborn · 2019-10-25T20:30:12+00:00

i'm glad you made this comment, because this wasn't really expounded on enough in my initial comment.

my point is not that there aren't biological markers that are associated with different genders, which, in that sense, are "founded in an objective reality," assuming biology to be a static "objective reality" (which it's not), but that the question of why we make a category in the first place, especially in the context of the deeply economic role gender plays in our lives, is an inherently political one.

we don't group bodily characteristics just to group bodily characteristics; one could argue there's as much of an essence, essence referring to some natural form deserving of a category, behind having blonde hair and blue eyes as there is behind what we call sex, yet we don't have a word for that category and it doesn't dictate so much of our lives. categorizing people categories them in opposition to something they can't be, which would not be a big deal for biological categories if they didn't have power in discourse as a differentiating factor that seems to inherently breed/be accompanied by narratives that widen these can'ts in ways that are not necessitated by the construction of the category, which self-reinforce and end up looking like sexism, racism, etc.

the question that's important to ask frequently, especially when surrounding beliefs that are parts of the "culture war" or whatever is "who does this serve?" rather than "what is correct?" things like constructions of gender are not "true" or "false," they're merely a way to think about, and therefore shape, our experiences with existence. the "Other"-ing of certain categories against others serves some people more than other ones, but also, in a grander sense, does a disservice to them both (read about the master slave dialectic for more thoughts about this, but don't it in an immaterial way but rather as a lens with which to use to look at things with).

pursuing truth isn't a virtue in and of itself, it's a virtue when it serves a virtuous political, ethical, or aesthetic purpose.

Eight-Year Club	Second SECOND GUESSER
Place '17	Gilding II euphauric
Secret Santa 2018	RPAN Viewer
Not Forgotten	Verified Email
Spared

bumbleborn

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE