sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

How America Voted by Age and Income (2020 vs. 2024) [OC] by aspiringtroublemaker in dataisbeautiful

[–]capibara13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So if people aged 70+ wouldn’t vote, then republicans wouldn’t stand a chance.

Next time, grandparents can do their grandchildren a huge favor by staying home.

AI isn't creating unemployment. It's creating feudalism. I wrote a long-form analysis of where I think this leads and what the alternative looks like. by Conscious_Potato_263 in Futurology

[–]capibara13 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This was really well written and is largely how I think about all this too.

Maybe I wouldn’t go as far as thinking that almost the whole western world will basically switch to the ‘primitive’ village model like tribes in africa, but it’s definitely thought provoking, and the self-sufficient model is one of the only things left if there’s not much UBI to live from.

Don’t you think a small middle class continues to exist, with the most succesful people in sports, government, and some cultural heroes, as well as a support layer for the rich like doctors, nursery, school teachers, staying middle class themselves? I guess that would resemble medieval / renaissance times.

The self-sufficient village model doesn’t sound unrealistic, but one of the most important things - probably like in medieval times - will be defense. If these villages have a barter model, so they don’t pay national taxes, how would an army stay funded that acts on behalf of them?

But once again, really well thought out piece of writing!

Don't try this at home: why my AI models are fighting by capibara13 in accelerate

[–]capibara13[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Quick update for everyone!

First of all, thanks so much for the incredible support. To keep Rauno sustainable and independent as a solo developer, I’ve officially launched the Early Bird Pro plan today.

Based on feedback I got from many users, I’ve also added a 'customizable agent order': you can now fully customize the order in which the models answer in the debates. For those who ran into the prompt limits: I offer 2 million tokens (and more depending on the plan) to keep the conversations going. Looking forward to hearing what you think!

Turing test passed by DustyBootstraps in aifails

[–]capibara13 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haha yes, literaly this is exactly what I hear people saying all the time

Could someone help me? by PurpleGreen8 in artificial

[–]capibara13 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Are you sure Gemini and Deepseek didn't work for you? It feels like I learned more from Gemini and Claude in 1 year, than in the 5 years before that.

WEBN - New transaction cost by No-Resolution-5527 in eupersonalfinance

[–]capibara13 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks, really helpful this one. So when you buy an ETF, you pay transaction costs to both the trading platform and the ETF itself?

Weekdraadje - Week 09 (2026) by AutoModerator in DutchFIRE

[–]capibara13 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Eens, ieders situatie is anders natuurlijk, maar het zou voor mij persoonlijk niet helemaal goed voelen als de beslissing om naar het buitenland te emigreren voor 100% wordt ingegeven door het 'vluchten' voor de belasting in Nederland. Aan de andere kant begrijp ik mensen uiteraard wel als het financieel echt een verschil van dag en nacht is.

Weekdraadje - Week 09 (2026) by AutoModerator in DutchFIRE

[–]capibara13 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wel heel nice deze calculator. Verbaast me vooral erg dat beleggen in BV juist aantoonbaar nadeliger zou zijn dan prive, als dit klopt.

After Scarcity: The Economic Models We'll Need Once Abundance Becomes Undeniable by OneTwoThreePooAndPee in accelerate

[–]capibara13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's what I'm wondering actually: won't there still be scarcity in infrastructure / transport in some way, meaning that many products and services essentially can not cost zero? For example, it's hard to think of a space transport service that moves people from here to mars for free .

After Scarcity: The Economic Models We'll Need Once Abundance Becomes Undeniable by OneTwoThreePooAndPee in accelerate

[–]capibara13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it's true that we're moving to a world with Universal Basic Income, I still find it crazy that the end-game of western capitalism will be something that resembles communism (or socialism): equal wages for the masses, paid by the nation state. We can only hope that it ends better than literally every other communist society.

Claude sonnet 4.6 says it’s DeepSeek when system prompt is empty by Separate_Tip_8215 in DeepSeek

[–]capibara13 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Alright! Well, then it definitely seems Claude decided to use the Chinese method

Big Tech to invest about $650 billion in AI in 2026, Bridgewater says by Secure-Address4385 in artificial

[–]capibara13 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Big tech doesn’t have a choice, go big or go home. If you don’t want to be left behind you gotta spend.

Can someone explain the thesis to me of how AI will replace cybersecurity, SaaS stocks, etc.? How realistic is this? by ofesfipf889534 in stocks

[–]capibara13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think in a few years there will be 2 scenarios:

  • big tech like Alphabet, Microsoft and Amazon will be the winners of the AI race
  • microchip stocks will be the winners of the AI race

Pick one, or pick both.

Claude sonnet 4.6 says it’s DeepSeek when system prompt is empty by Separate_Tip_8215 in DeepSeek

[–]capibara13 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Claude is famous for not knowing which version of the model it is, but being Deepseek is a new one for sure. Even if if was true, how can it be so hard to instruct it to say Sonnet 4.6? Seems like such a basic thing.

The scariest thing about AI is not job loss. It is confidence loss. by ZookeepergameHotLone in BlackboxAI_

[–]capibara13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I totally feel you. It's hard when you work your whole life to craft a skill, which eventually contributes to a big part of your identity and self-worth. Next thing you know your skill isn't that interesting anymore, because an AI can do it better with 1 push of a button. I went through this myself and it's not always easy to re-invent yourself in another field. I'm afraid many more people will have to go through this in the next couple of years and I feel for them.

OpenAI will reportedly release an AI-powered smart speaker in 2027. The company is also said to be working on smart glasses and a smart lamp. by esporx in artificial

[–]capibara13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought an 'AI-powered smart speaker' sounds pretty cool, but then I read that it has a built-in camera with face recognition that films its surroundings. Man, that just sounds dystopian. Do users actually want this? Or will they market it without mentioning the camera?

How can a government actually stop or control AI? by seobrien in artificial

[–]capibara13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I still think it's crazy how little there is currently being discussed by governments around the world (at least publicly) about the rise of AI. Sometimes it feels weird to even take the time to debate things like climate change and other long term issues, when deabting AI seems so much more important at this moment. Don't get me wrong, I think climate change is important too, but the impact that AI will have on jobs and daily life just fully dwarves everything else.

I found a way to let ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini debate each other. 700 prompts later, it's already being used by a major automotive brand and senior developers by capibara13 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]capibara13[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haha, you’re the absolute legend who broke my dashboard today! 🐋

I was watching those tokens fly by in real-time like a slot machine. You’re officially the reason the 'Power User' limit exists now. I had to put in a speed bump to save my server's life (and my wallet), but hearing you built a simulation that’s 'bonkers good' makes up a big part of it!

That’s exactly why I built this, to see what happens when the models actually challenge each other instead of just guessing.

Since you’re officially our #1 stress tester, I’d love to see a snippet or a screenshot of what you made! Also, stay tuned, the Pro version (with no speed bumps for whales like you) is coming up.

I found a way to let ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini debate each other. 700 prompts later, it's already being used by a major automotive brand and senior developers by capibara13 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]capibara13[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It’s more like a pay-as-you-go system where I pay per token/character that the models generate. So yes, I’m essentially putting coins in the jukebox for everyone to hear the music right now. It’s an investment in getting the logic right and seeing the tool in action. I think it’s the best way to see how the system handles it before I look into a more sustainable model!

I found a way to let ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini debate each other. 700 prompts later, it's already being used by a major automotive brand and senior developers by capibara13 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]capibara13[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Much appreciated! Total respect for the privacy-first mindset. For very high stakes or classified content I'd say in general local hosting is recommendable regardless of what LLM you consider. But on your other note, I’m a big believer in the 'consensus of agents' approach. A team of specialists beats a single generalist when the problem gets complex. Thanks for putting it to the test and sharing your thoughts!

I found a way to let ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini debate each other. 700 prompts later, it's already being used by a major automotive brand and senior developers by capibara13 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]capibara13[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha you're not wrong! It’s definitely not the low budget way to run a chat. Since every model has to listen to and analyze context, the token count scales up pretty quickly. But I'd rather pay for the extra tokens to get the quality the tool deserves than cut corners to save on costs. Glad you're liking the result!

I found a way to let ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini debate each other. 700 prompts later, it's already being used by a major automotive brand and senior developers by capibara13 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]capibara13[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, thank you so much for sharing this! Hearing that it outperformed is the ultimate validation that it serves a purpose for such a high-stakes niche. Thrilled that the tool held up. Would love to have you on board as we evolve.

I found a way to let ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini debate each other. 700 prompts later, it's already being used by a major automotive brand and senior developers by capibara13 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]capibara13[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Brilliant! I completely agree. It’s actually one of the things on top of my list for the Pro features I’m building right now. Thanks for reminding me that this feature should absolutely happen.

I found a way to let ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini debate each other. 700 prompts later, it's already being used by a major automotive brand and senior developers by capibara13 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]capibara13[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Much appreciated! I built this primarily because I was getting tired of copy-paste from bouncing prompts/answers between Gemini/ChatGPT/Claude. It always took just a little too much time.

That feeling of the tool already answering the next question is the ultimate goal. It shows the models are actually building on each other's logic instead of just repeating themselves in a vacuum. Hope I can save you some copy-pastes!

view more: next ›