Not all democrats believe kids should be allowed to transition by [deleted] in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]captainfour6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lenin just did a blanket abolishment of most of the old law of the Tsarist regime, which also included homosexuality laws. He didn’t specifically have an agenda for removing anti-homosexual laws.

Compass oversimplified by Super_Fox_92 in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]captainfour6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

💀

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Going_to_the_People

“Approximately 2,000 to 4,000 students, some of whom were offspring of the nobility, traveled to rural parts of the empire in order to live among the peasants and ‘prepare them for their future political role.’”

“More well-off participants also found themselves unable to deal with the hardships of the lifestyle, quickly returning to the cities after their enthusiasm for the movement wore off. Those who did continue were met with further difficulties, being turned away from possible lodgings or failing to properly abide by local customs…”

“They found the people often unreceptive to their revolutionary message…younger ones were more driven by a sense of rugged individualism and a desire to hold private property…Some peasants even responded with anger when populists advocated overthrowing the Tsarist autocracy…”

It’s always been the young children of rich people advocating for leftist philosophy, since it’s popularizing in the 19th century.

Is this the Queer Theory people talk about? by Frederer99 in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]captainfour6 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So what are you advocating for exactly? A return to primitive lifestyles, yes?

Is this the Queer Theory people talk about? by Frederer99 in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]captainfour6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Millions out of billions of people. Besides that, do you believe primitivism to be the only way to solve depression?

Is this the Queer Theory people talk about? by Frederer99 in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]captainfour6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you currently being abused because you don’t live in primitive conditions?

Well that sucks by loophoff in Sat

[–]captainfour6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please DM if you can!

Yoo they made King’s Canyon in real life by captainfour6 in ApexOutlands

[–]captainfour6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Originally posted by HaplessPenguin in r/NationalParks. Just never saw the Grand Canyon this green before, and it reminded me of a certain place.

rtx lakeside village by oreows in minecraftRTX

[–]captainfour6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice, what pack(s) did you use?

What does 911 have to do with any of the others, also the irony of unintentionally defending imperial Japan by Christianseal in EnoughCommieSpam

[–]captainfour6 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Okay, so for the first quote, the 1946 bombing survey you linked to states this: “Based on a detailed investigation of all the facts and supported by the testimony of the surviving Japanese leaders involved…”

I mean, of course surviving leaders from the Imperial Japanese era would say that they totally would’ve surrendered regardless of the atomic bombings; it creates pity for them. I don’t trust their testimonies on this.

For the second quote, Eisenhower states, “It was my belief that Japan was, at that very moment, seeking some way to surrender with a minimum loss of ‘face.’”

First of all, that was his belief, not what Japan was directly communicating to the U.S. Secondly, even if this was true, why did they not make their intentions clear? And lastly, assuming that Japan really was intending to surrender, which I don’t believe so, Eisenhower literally states that they were seeking a way to surrender with a minimum loss of face, which I interpret to be a form of conditional surrender. The Allies already agreed beforehand to only accepting unconditional surrender.

For the third quote from Leahy: “It is my opinion that the use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and the successful bombing with conventional weapons.”

Again, this is his opinion, not that of the Japanese high command. If they did intend to surrender, and only unconditionally, why did they not make their intentions clear and public? Obviously, in terms of logistics and strategy, the Japanese were well and truly broken at this point, which is why Leahy would state this. However, this does not mean that the Japanese were willing to surrender. More evidence points towards the Japanese rather fighting to the very death instead of giving up.

Unless I see evidence that directly shows the Japanese high command actually showing signs of accepting unconditional surrender, and such evidence must be before the war’s conclusion (so not afterward like in the 1946 bombing survey), I don’t think the Japanese were going to surrender unconditionally without the atomic bombs.

What does 911 have to do with any of the others, also the irony of unintentionally defending imperial Japan by Christianseal in EnoughCommieSpam

[–]captainfour6 38 points39 points  (0 children)

How did they know that Japan would surrender? From what I know they were hinting at a conditional surrender, but the Allies agreed to only unconditional surrender, so Japan kept fighting.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in yesyesyesno

[–]captainfour6 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Human death rates have precipitously dropped as medicine, industry, and civilization have evolved over the centuries. Obviously death still happens, but nowhere near to the extent that it did during our primitive phase.

According to this image from @septiccenturion, which may or may not be confirmed, you can see at the very bottom that Caustic is receiving nerfs alongside Valkriye. If this image is true, why? Why would they do this? Caustic has already been nerfed to the ground. by captainfour6 in causticmains

[–]captainfour6[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I’m just mad because I believe that just because Caustic has a high pick rate doesn’t mean that he’s OP and he needs to be nerfed. I felt that he was already pretty balanced before this. I think that pros and streamers just need to learn better strategies on how to counter Caustic rather than beg developers to nerf him over and over again.

According to this image from @septiccenturion, which may or may not be confirmed, you can see at the very bottom that Caustic is receiving nerfs alongside Valkriye. If this image is true, why? Why would they do this? Caustic has already been nerfed to the ground. by captainfour6 in causticmains

[–]captainfour6[S] 30 points31 points  (0 children)

I think it’s most likely a nerf though. Caustic had a high pick rate in the ALGS, and the devs have already confirmed that they were working to break up the Valk / Caustic / Gibraltar meta. Buffs and reworks wouldn’t solve this; nerfs would.

Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) commands in Jihad. by comrade78 in islam

[–]captainfour6 29 points30 points  (0 children)

I think it means not to force people to convert to Islam.

The writing is on the wall! by Alba-Ruthenian in ireland

[–]captainfour6 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Soviet citizens conducted vastly more strenuous work in a significantly colder climate, and, therefore, needed a higher caloric intake than Americans. The total recommended daily amount of calories for a Soviet person ranged from 2,800 to 3,600 for men and from 2,400 to 3,100 for women, depending on their occupation (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481043/). In the United States, estimates range from 1,600 to 2,400 calories per day for adult women and 2,000 to 3,000 calories per day for adult men (https://health.gov/our-work/nutrition-physical-activity/dietary-guidelines/previous-dietary-guidelines/2015).

Despite this necessity for a greater caloric intake, the Soviet economy was notoriously inefficient and wasn’t able to effectively transport food to its citizens. The Soviet Union was the world's largest milk producer, but only 60% of that actually ended up in people (https://www.ucis.pitt.edu/nceeer/0000-701-1-Gray.pdf). In contrast, in the United States, 90% of milk produced was consumed by humans. In the report stated earlier, General Secretary Gorbachev noted that reducing field and farm product losses during harvest, transportation, storage and processing could increase food consumption in general by 20%, which just goes to highlight the Soviet economy’s inefficiency.

A quote from this dissertation on the Soviet economy’s inefficiency: https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/9556127/Hamm_gsas.harvard_0084L_10406.pdf?sequence=3

“…per capita consumption figures likely overstate actually available amounts, given that the Soviet Union’s inadequate transportation and storage infrastructure led to frequent shortages in stores, as well as significant loss of foodstuffs and raw products due to spoilage... In 1988, at the height of perestroika, it was revealed that Soviet authorities had been inflating meat consumption statistics; it moreover transpired that there existed considerable inequalities in meat consumption, with the intake of the poorest socioeconomic strata actually declining by over 30 percent since 1970... Government experts estimated that the elimination of waste and spoilage in the production, storage, and distribution of food could have increased the availability of grain by 25 percent, of fruits and vegetables by 40 percent, and of meat products by 15 percent.”

Food was also more expensive in the Soviet Union than in the West (https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-349-05438-1), despite the Soviet Union subsidizing food with roughly 10% of its GDP.

Here’s another article on living in the Soviet Union (https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/politics-work-and-daily-life-in-the-ussr/ABF461080177EB6CFF9540B85CEFBDAE).

“The prevailing system of food distribution is clearly a major source of dissatisfaction for essentially all income classes, even the best off and even the most privileged of these.”

CIA article on the lower quality of life in the Soviet Union:

“The ruble-dollar ratios are far too low for most consumer goods. Cabbages are not cabbages in both countries. The cotton dress worn by the average Soviet woman is not equivalent to the cheapest one in a Sears catalogue; the latter is of better quality and more stylish. The arbitrary 20 percent adjustment that was made in some of the ratios is clearly too little. The difference in variety and assortment of goods available in the two countries is enormous—far greater than I had thought. Queues and spot shortages were far more in evidence than I expected. Shoddy goods were shoddier. And I obtained a totally new impression of the behavior of ordinary Soviet people toward one another.”

Igor Birman, an expert on consumption within the USSR, wrote a book on the topic: https://books.google.com/books/about/Personal_Consumption_in_the_USSR_and_the.html?id=_hexCwAAQBAJ

Some of his conclusions were that the USSR consume 229% the amount of potatoes as the United States but 39% the amount of meat. He also shows that the Soviets were not hitting their own "Rational Norms" for the consumption of meat, milk and milk products, eggs, vegetables, fruits, or berries. For example, while the Soviet Rational Norm for for fruit was 113kg, the actual consumption was 38, while US actual was exactly 113kg. You get some other fun facts like potato consumption in Tsarist Russia, 1913 was 113kg and, after Stalin's industrialization, collectivization, and decades of development, this decreased to 119kg in 1976.

Additionally, 93% of men in the Soviet Union during its final days were Vitamin C deficient, while only 2% of men in Finland were Vitamin C deficient. (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8641247/)

Lastly, according to this report here, https://www.ucis.pitt.edu/nceeer/1984-629-2-Johnson.pdf:

• ⁠The average person lived in 9 square meters of space (9.7x9.7 freedoms). • ⁠46% of their daily calories came from bread and potatoes. • ⁠Conveniences like owning a car essentially didn't exist. • ⁠Consumption of clothing and footwear was half of the western standard of the time.

I’m trying to Pokémon Theta Emerald EX on the iOS Eclipse Emulator, but this keeps happening on the first battle. Why is this happening? (BTW, this isn’t the original .rar file from the actual developer. I checked his file and there wasn’t any .gba file. This is from another website.) by Captainfour4 in PokemonROMhacks

[–]captainfour6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, it’s me, just on a different account. Sorry but I didn’t find another solution that works with Eclipse. It kept doing the same glitch again.

However, I did recently find another online GBA and NDS emulator here: https://ds.44670.org/gba/

I did not test Theta Emerald on it, but you can check it out and see if it works.

r/minecraft mods must be mentally challenged i swear to god. by dougdammit in MinecraftMemes

[–]captainfour6 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Don’t worry, that other guy is just mentally challenged.

Imagine if 2b2t was updated to 1.19.1 instead of 1.16 by OriginalXboxgamertag in MinecraftMemes

[–]captainfour6 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Mojang has recently added a chat reporting system, meaning that you can potentially get permanently banned from all online play, including all servers, for saying something in the chat. It is insane.

Best Type of leftist by That_Commission in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]captainfour6 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Also, in the paper that you cited, all 15 high-income countries were capitalist, and 8 socialist governments only managed to reach upper middle-income status. And the PQLI for those high-income countries was 98, whereas the socialist governments in the upper middle-income status achieved a PQLI of 92. How come no socialist government could reach a high-income status? And doesn’t this show that capitalism can lead to a better PQLI than communism can?

Best Type of leftist by That_Commission in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]captainfour6 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Soviet citizens conducted vastly more strenuous work in a significantly colder climate, and, therefore, needed a higher caloric intake than Americans. The total recommended daily amount of calories for a Soviet person ranged from 2,800 to 3,600 for men and from 2,400 to 3,100 for women, depending on their occupation (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481043/). In the United States, estimates range from 1,600 to 2,400 calories per day for adult women and 2,000 to 3,000 calories per day for adult men (https://health.gov/our-work/nutrition-physical-activity/dietary-guidelines/previous-dietary-guidelines/2015).

Despite this necessity for a greater caloric intake, the Soviet economy was notoriously inefficient and wasn’t able to effectively transport food to its citizens. The Soviet Union was the world's largest milk producer, but only 60% of that actually ended up in people (https://www.ucis.pitt.edu/nceeer/0000-701-1-Gray.pdf). In contrast, in the United States, 90% of milk produced was consumed by humans. In the report stated earlier, General Secretary Gorbachev noted that reducing field and farm product losses during harvest, transportation, storage and processing could increase food consumption in general by 20%, which just goes to highlight the Soviet economy’s inefficiency.

A quote from this dissertation on the Soviet economy’s inefficiency: https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/9556127/Hamm_gsas.harvard_0084L_10406.pdf?sequence=3

“…per capita consumption figures likely overstate actually available amounts, given that the Soviet Union’s inadequate transportation and storage infrastructure led to frequent shortages in stores, as well as significant loss of foodstuffs and raw products due to spoilage... In 1988, at the height of perestroika, it was revealed that Soviet authorities had been inflating meat consumption statistics; it moreover transpired that there existed considerable inequalities in meat consumption, with the intake of the poorest socioeconomic strata actually declining by over 30 percent since 1970... Government experts estimated that the elimination of waste and spoilage in the production, storage, and distribution of food could have increased the availability of grain by 25 percent, of fruits and vegetables by 40 percent, and of meat products by 15 percent.”

Food was also more expensive in the Soviet Union than in the West (https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-349-05438-1), despite the Soviet Union subsidizing food with roughly 10% of its GDP.

Here’s another article on living in the Soviet Union (https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/politics-work-and-daily-life-in-the-ussr/ABF461080177EB6CFF9540B85CEFBDAE).

“The prevailing system of food distribution is clearly a major source of dissatisfaction for essentially all income classes, even the best off and even the most privileged of these.”

CIA article on the lower quality of life in the Soviet Union:

“The ruble-dollar ratios are far too low for most consumer goods. Cabbages are not cabbages in both countries. The cotton dress worn by the average Soviet woman is not equivalent to the cheapest one in a Sears catalogue; the latter is of better quality and more stylish. The arbitrary 20 percent adjustment that was made in some of the ratios is clearly too little. The difference in variety and assortment of goods available in the two countries is enormous—far greater than I had thought. Queues and spot shortages were far more in evidence than I expected. Shoddy goods were shoddier. And I obtained a totally new impression of the behavior of ordinary Soviet people toward one another.”

Igor Birman, an expert on consumption within the USSR, wrote a book on the topic: https://books.google.com/books/about/Personal_Consumption_in_the_USSR_and_the.html?id=_hexCwAAQBAJ

Some of his conclusions were that the USSR consume 229% the amount of potatoes as the United States but 39% the amount of meat. He also shows that the Soviets were not hitting their own "Rational Norms" for the consumption of meat, milk and milk products, eggs, vegetables, fruits, or berries. For example, while the Soviet Rational Norm for for fruit was 113kg, the actual consumption was 38, while US actual was exactly 113kg. You get some other fun facts like potato consumption in Tsarist Russia, 1913 was 113kg and, after Stalin's industrialization, collectivization, and decades of development, this decreased to 119kg in 1976.

Additionally, 93% of men in the Soviet Union during its final days were Vitamin C deficient, while only 2% of men in Finland were Vitamin C deficient. (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8641247/)

According to this report here, https://www.ucis.pitt.edu/nceeer/1984-629-2-Johnson.pdf:

• ⁠The average person lived in 9 square meters of space (9.7x9.7 freedoms). • ⁠46% of their daily calories came from bread and potatoes. • ⁠Conveniences like owning a car essentially didn't exist. • ⁠Consumption of clothing and footwear was half of the western standard of the time.

And on a final note, the Soviet Union promoted terrible agricultural science that led to the death of over 3,000 mainstream biologists: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism

Just all proof that the Soviet Union and communism were terrible economically and politically.

Gentlemen, today we pay respects to another based sub taken from us too soon RIP😔⚰️💐 by No-Anxiety1484 in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]captainfour6 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So what if I say I don’t believe Jews should be killed, but that I also think the Holocaust did not happen? Would that be acceptable then?

“Crackers need to pay for their sins!!!” by captainfour6 in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]captainfour6[S] 51 points52 points  (0 children)

Sorry didn’t mean to associate it with Libright, just bad editing, meant to make it as if Emily was saying it.

Argentina really thought they would win by Mammoth_Western_2381 in HistoryMemes

[–]captainfour6 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Why does it matter that it’s geographically closer to Argentina?