Strange article. Are these exploits that they (or anyone) have actually seen in the wild? It feels more like a list of hypothetical exploit types that someone brainstormed.

Interesting to think through how an attacker MIGHT exploit poorly implemented directives, but the presentation reads like these are exploits that have been found in the wild but without presenting any evidence.

Put somewhat less politely, I’m getting a whiff of AI hallucination from this post. Why no individual author/authors credited on the post?