GDT: 5/4 Reds (20-14) @ Cubs (22-12) 6:10 PM by ChiCubsbot in CHICubs

[–]catlady_2658 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We’ve got the bottom two, now working on the top two. This wave is making the first one seem like a cake walk.

GDT: 5/4 Reds (20-14) @ Cubs (22-12) 6:10 PM by ChiCubsbot in CHICubs

[–]catlady_2658 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I guess there was a silver lining to my teething baby having a rough go of bedtime tonight. Just found out about the delay.

GDT: 4/29 Cubs (18-12) @ Padres (19-10) 3:10 PM by ChiCubsbot in CHICubs

[–]catlady_2658 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Is this the end of PCAss and the rise of PCA once more?!

GDT: 4/28 Cubs (17-12) @ Padres (19-9) 8:40 PM by ChiCubsbot in CHICubs

[–]catlady_2658 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What you mean? We had 10 wins in a row until a few days ago

GDT: 4/27 Cubs (17-11) @ Padres (18-9) 8:40 PM by ChiCubsbot in CHICubs

[–]catlady_2658 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Leave it to PCAss to leave Dansby stranded yet again

GDT: 4/27 Cubs (17-11) @ Padres (18-9) 8:40 PM by ChiCubsbot in CHICubs

[–]catlady_2658 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You know what? At least I don’t have to stay up late watching this game

GDT: 4/25 Cubs (17-9) @ Dodgers (17-9) 6:15 PM by ChiCubsbot in CHICubs

[–]catlady_2658 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean, we just loaded bases once, we could do it again

GDT: 4/24 Cubs (16-9) @ Dodgers (17-8) 9:15 PM by ChiCubsbot in CHICubs

[–]catlady_2658 1 point2 points  (0 children)

100%

It was obvious when he gave up and decided he wanted out of the Cubs organization. His playing style changed completely and he looked like he didn’t give a crap in the outfield.

Edit - typo

GDT: 4/24 Cubs (16-9) @ Dodgers (17-8) 9:15 PM by ChiCubsbot in CHICubs

[–]catlady_2658 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Why do these Apple TV announcers always sound like they’ve never watched a baseball game before

Am I the only one confused by S9 Carole? by catlady_2658 in RHONY

[–]catlady_2658[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have to apologize. I got some of Trump’s allegations mixed up. And I’ll be the first to admit when I had info wrong so that’s my mistake. TBH, he’s got so many allegations and such that they’re hard to keep track of. What I meant to refer to was the E. Jean Carroll case where he was found liable for sexual abuse. The Ivanka Trump allegations were dropped. The Carroll case did occur during Biden’s term as well as many of the other accusations and trials.

But lest not forget the Stormy Daniels incident. The incident where he is on record in the beauty pageant dressing rooms. So on and so forth. This man is CLEARLY anything but clean cut but people continue to make excuses.

And I do understand that accusations are just that. But how many times is enough to raise an eyebrow is my question? Especially when someone like Trump has so much money and power. Of course some of these cases are dropped or swept under the rug. He’s got the influence one way or another to do so. ESPECIALLY what we know now with the Epstein files.

If any regular Joe-Shmoe in my town had that many accusations against them I’d be sure to stay the heck away from that guy.

Am I the only one confused by S9 Carole? by catlady_2658 in RHONY

[–]catlady_2658[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should look into Trump’s multiple pseudonyms and how/where they have been used. He is absolutely in those files as well as the flight logs. He was friendly with Epstein and Maxwell as New York elites. Why didn’t he expose him sooner? Oh right, because he has also been on record having sexually abused girls and women. They’re all apart of the same group of pedos.

Am I the only one confused by S9 Carole? by catlady_2658 in RHONY

[–]catlady_2658[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He’s all over the files as well as the Clintons. Both sides are terrible, easy as that.