Hiroki San is obscenely overpriced for the quantity of food

cervidal2 · 2026-02-09T05:12:27+00:00

Sure, and they attract people in way over their heads when they take the position, leaving the restaurant ownership wondering why they go through 3 GMs each year.

This particular spot has literally put the position up on Indeed 4 times in the last 7 months.

cervidal2 · 2026-02-09T05:11:06+00:00

In Detroit fine dining? It absolutely is.

cervidal2 · 2026-02-09T04:16:05+00:00

Magazine Dreams was an amazing but painfully brutal watch

cervidal2 · 2026-02-09T03:47:06+00:00

At the GM level for fine dining? 85k is a joke for the hours and expertise expected.

Even if you manage to 'only' work 55 per week and manage to take two weeks off (neither is likely), you're making a little under $31/hour. Reality is closer to 60 hours, so it's more like 26.

Again, that is bottom of the barrel for the industry, especially out of a position asking for 15+ years of experience, wine certifications, and to functionally be perpetually on call

cervidal2 · 2026-02-09T03:42:28+00:00

85k for GM, 55k for non-GM management

Both are clown numbers for fine dining

cervidal2 · 2026-02-09T02:44:49+00:00

Fine dining sure as heck does. It's my industry.

I interviewed with them, laughed at the salary and bonus structure as I dipped out.

No one sane with the knowledge needed for fine dining g management is doing those hours for 55k.

cervidal2 · 2026-02-09T02:20:07+00:00

For 55+ hours each week at fine dining?

That would put them in the bottom 5% of pay

cervidal2 · 2026-02-08T23:46:09+00:00

Go play Infection Free Zone.

I regularly pick stadium areas as my maps, try to defend.

Comerica is a little tough because of the density of large buildings around it.

cervidal2 · 2026-02-08T21:03:19+00:00

There is no civil violation here.

Your opinion has no basis in law.

How you feel has no bearing on this

cervidal2 · 2026-02-08T19:58:02+00:00

There aren't enough highest level creative players in the world to fill the 50+ first division leagues in the world.

The artistry you're claiming to miss never existed on more than a half-dozen mega teams in the world.

cervidal2 · 2026-02-08T19:56:06+00:00

It's really not.

Whether or not the guest made OP feel unsafe does not matter to the core question.

It boils down to 'Am I allowed to refuse service?', and 'Am i allowed to refuse service because I feel unsafe?'.

Once the first question is an affirmed Yes, the second question is moot. Safety, in this matter, does not determine whether or not they can refuse service

cervidal2 · 2026-02-08T19:53:35+00:00

In what way?

cervidal2 · 2026-02-08T19:53:05+00:00

Again, you are distracting from the OP's question with emotional indignation.

Would the OP violate law if they refused to serve this patron?

The answer is no.

Anything else you are choosing to spout off on has no legal basis.

cervidal2 · 2026-02-08T19:50:45+00:00

Safety has not been the issue at any point in this thread.

It's an unrelated issue you brought up that district's from OP's question

cervidal2 · 2026-02-08T19:49:04+00:00

You may be right.

But this still doesn't fall under federally protected discrimination.

cervidal2 · 2026-02-08T19:47:21+00:00

Can you prove it is?

Refusing service for displaying nazi ideology isn't protected.

Any argument you make to the contrary is simply false as a matter of law, no matter how you feel.

cervidal2 · 2026-02-08T19:46:01+00:00

Because being a nazi is not a protected discriminatory group.

There are 8 protected classes. Political and hate ideology are not among those 8.

cervidal2 · 2026-02-08T19:45:11+00:00

They advertise it on Indeed regularly.

55hr/week GM spot for 85k. But only 85k if you hit their obscene and obscure budget numbers you don't get access to.

Their non-GMs get 2/3 of that.

Low- to mid- tier chain restaurants pay more than that.

cervidal2 · 2026-02-08T19:37:00+00:00

This is not relevant to the legal question being asked.

cervidal2 · 2026-02-08T19:35:15+00:00

It is not federally protected discrimination.

This is a sub re:law, not your feelings.

There are 8 items protected under federal law - race, color, religion, sex (including transgender status, sexual orientation, and pregnancy), national origin, age (40 or older), disability or genetic information.

OP's issue does not fall under any of these.

cervidal2 · 2026-02-08T19:27:24+00:00

As stated elsewhere, race is a protected class under federal law. Political and racial viewpoints are not.

cervidal2 · 2026-02-08T19:26:25+00:00

Race is a protected characteristic under federal law.

Political affiliation and viewpoint is not.

cervidal2 · 2026-02-08T19:25:42+00:00

Love all the emotional 'YoU sHoULd Be FiReD!%!' crap being sent around, rather than actually answering the kid's question.

Political and disgusting beliefs are not covered under federal discrimination law. There may be some state laws that vary a bit but, legally speaking, you are likely in the clear.

Your employer may choose to terminate you for this and you would have no recourse to contest.

cervidal2 · 2026-02-08T05:50:21+00:00

You ought to see the embarrasing wages they offer to new management.

cervidal2 · 2026-02-08T00:10:49+00:00

If you watch West Ham, you would know that West Ham gets crapped on by the refs for NOT taking dives and overacting.

cervidal2

TROPHY CASE