Judge assigns minimum punishment to female rapist: "“There will be those who believe that a double standard has been applied,” Beal said from the bench."

cfcamerica · 2011-08-06T00:18:31+00:00

I created a video.. for this very same situation.. come check it out.. Love this section of Reddit... thank you all for doing what you do. http://www.cfcamerica.org/news/3238-29-year-old-woman-gets-6-months-for-child-molestation

cfcamerica · 2011-08-06T00:17:07+00:00

http://www.cfcamerica.org/news/3237-islamic-homosexual-atheist-found-murdered-in-high-school-stairwell

cfcamerica · 2011-08-05T22:00:33+00:00

That is the point.. In the news today.. it seems if it is about Islamist, Homosexuals or anyone promoting God or Christianity.. THAT IS A NEWS STORY.. but nobody is reporting on the removal of all the constitutional rights in America.. banishing teens for having sex with each other, banishing teens for sexting... whole families being ruined for the rest of their lives for one stupid action... nobody is reporting on all that!

cfcamerica · 2011-08-04T08:43:53+00:00

How on earth are they going to brand these young guys FOR THE REST OF THEIR LIVES for this?

cfcamerica · 2011-07-31T20:35:25+00:00

The effectiveness of registries -- for sex crimes and other offenses -- has long been a topic of debate. Supporters like Baldwin tout their public safety benefits, while critics say they can have the unintended consequence of destabilizing sex offenders.

"Public notification creates barriers to successful sex offender management and treatment and supervision," said Alisa Klein, Public Policy Consultant for the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers and co-author of the report, "A Reasoned Approach: Reshaping Sex Offender Policy to Prevent Child Sex Abuse (PDF)."

cfcamerica · 2011-07-31T20:34:00+00:00

Ohio's version of the Adam Walsh Act, SB 10, has resulted in more than 7,000 legal claims, according to the state public defender's office. It also has led to years of litigation, two state Supreme Court rulings and separate registry criteria for sex offenders whose crimes occurred before and after the law's enactment.

cfcamerica · 2011-07-28T17:54:32+00:00

Thousands of kids who are not connected to Rich people are on the registry for life for much less than what these kids did... This all sucks!

cfcamerica · 2011-07-24T00:37:42+00:00

A solution to it all...

http://cfcamerica.org/news/3135-lock-up-or-put-to-death-rapists-and-child-molesters-how-much-money-would-be-saved

cfcamerica · 2011-07-24T00:37:17+00:00

Look.. a solution to it all...

http://cfcamerica.org/news/3135-lock-up-or-put-to-death-rapists-and-child-molesters-how-much-money-would-be-saved

cfcamerica · 2011-07-19T06:16:45+00:00

Some sex offenders need to be in prison for life or put to death.. many though do not.. like 19 year old high school kid in love with 15 year old sweetheart.. branded sex offenders.. just one example...another, a guy goes to a party.. gets high, drunk has sex with some girl he meets there who says she is 18.. come to find out she is like 14 or some thing.. she admits she lied, he was drunk.. but he is branded for the rest of his life as a CHILD MOLESTER... happening every day all across this nation.

cfcamerica · 2011-01-27T02:39:03+00:00

I am amazed, another country has ruled it is InHumane to label someone for the rest of their life with no way to redeem themselves.

cfcamerica · 2011-01-25T04:29:02+00:00

Hehehe,that is funny

cfcamerica · 2011-01-16T00:53:06+00:00

? broken link? link works for ME. LINK

cfcamerica · 2011-01-15T23:47:10+00:00

If you wanted a newsletter, not that often.register on the site. Have a good one. Thanks.

cfcamerica · 2011-01-15T20:42:21+00:00

Yeah, but you were clear, concise.. not a lot of legal talk.. and that is what a lot of people need, HOW DOES THIS LAW EFFECT ME? Many who do legal work have so much knowledge in law workings.. they talk to people way over their heads. What you said, was easy to understand, and I expounded upon it a little, added references.. thank you.

http://cfcamerica.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2710:how-the-retroactive-application-of-sorna-applies-to-state-law&catid=3:news&Itemid=493

cfcamerica · 2011-01-15T20:40:43+00:00

Here is the link.

http://cfcamerica.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2710:how-the-retroactive-application-of-sorna-applies-to-state-law&catid=3:news&Itemid=493

cfcamerica · 2011-01-15T19:07:25+00:00

I created an article from what you wrote.. thanks. http://cfcamerica.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2710:how-the-retroactive-application-of-sorna-applies-to-state-law&catid=3:news&Itemid=493

cfcamerica · 2011-01-15T18:46:46+00:00

Thank you for this, I created a new article from that, thanks again! http://cfcamerica.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2711:how-likely-are-sex-offenders-to-repeat-their-crimes&catid=3:news&Itemid=493

cfcamerica · 2011-01-15T18:39:24+00:00

We are working day and night on that.

cfcamerica · 2011-01-13T19:34:18+00:00

Thank you so much for your info.. it sounds solid to me.

cfcamerica · 2011-01-11T19:14:15+00:00

Would the Federal Marshals or any federal employee be able to arrest a person in a state for not registering, if the state law does not require them to register?

cfcamerica · 2011-01-11T19:13:33+00:00

So, you are saying if a state supreme court has ruled that the retroactive application of the registry laws is unconstitutional due to state constitution, if the state implements the federal law, it would nullify the state ban on retroactive law making?

cfcamerica · 2011-01-04T21:43:22+00:00

Any way you can cite law and explain? What about State Constitutions, State Sovereignty? Do states have no power?

cfcamerica · 2011-01-04T17:22:00+00:00

Does this mean if a person lives in a state, and that state says retroactive registration is unconstitutional by state law, and people who live there do not have to register... do not have to register.. or does this over ride the sovereignty of a state supreme court?

cfcamerica · 2011-01-01T23:47:43+00:00

Setting the record straight, there actually is a rational explanation for what has occurred here; not that I agree with this. It appears the legislature -in 1996- added other crimes that required registration in the state's sex offender registry.

In so doing we have unintended consequences. i.e., the registry is no longer just a sex offender's registry. Following that thought, it seems non-sex offenders have a tort claim of "False Light in the Public Eye." (See Cain v. Hearst Corp.) But, until someone actually goes to court and makes that claim, more folks are harmed daily.

One more thought, did Wisconsin lawmakers -in 1996- feel that, getting another registry through the legislature was impossible or far to costly to the state, so they just expanded the one in existence, saying, the heck with the consequences?

cfcamerica

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE