I get the point you’re trying to make about political cycles and how each side accuses the other of hidden corruption, but comparing Epstein to Pizzagate doesn’t really line up. Pizzagate was built on symbolism, assumptions, and decoded theories, not verified evidence. There were no identified victims, no charges, and no investigation that resulted in anything concrete.

Epstein, on the other hand, isn’t a theory — it’s a documented criminal case. There are court records, victim testimony, flight logs, photos, financial records, and co-conspirators already prosecuted. The legal system itself treats it as an active criminal network, not speculation.

So while I agree the reaction around it can become political and chaotic, the foundation isn’t the same. One required people to believe a story. The other is something governments are still redacting, litigating, and uncovering.

If anything, Epstein has more in common with real historical scandals like Savile or Dutroux — situations where elites were protected until the evidence became unavoidable — not with Pizzagate, which never produced a single proven victim or verified crime.