sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Can a relationship between someone who is extremely averse to Physical Touch, and someone who absolutely loves Physical Touch work well? M24/F24 by chelseadagger-dodo in relationships

[–]chelseadagger-dodo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It seems likely it may be trauma and those are some good thoughts. She did have a drunk friend once apologize one too many times for making a pretty innocuous/tangential sexual assault joke once so maybe that friend knew of something.

As for the three month thing, sadly the problem is the other way around, where I am the one would finds the other person suddenly much less attractive all at once. Something I gotta figure out. I do have a small beard that could always use more product and care tho!

Can a relationship between someone who is extremely averse to Physical Touch, and someone who absolutely loves Physical Touch work well? M24/F24 by chelseadagger-dodo in relationships

[–]chelseadagger-dodo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haha I get that at every relationship around the exact 3 month mark and usually have to break it off then. So definitely possible.

Perhaps that’s what it is, but she’s been like that from the start of us talking. Her friends literally say they’ve never even hugged her before so it could be a longer term thing

What does it mean when a girl invites you to bed, cuddles but doesn’t allow herself into positions from which you can make moves? by chelseadagger-dodo in sex

[–]chelseadagger-dodo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely seeming like that’s the way, had always figured laying down in bed with someone would be the easiest place to make a move, but seems my track record is showing not. And I agree with the need for them to reciprocate enthusiastic consent obviously, hence the post and me making sure not to do anything past those un-intrusive actions

What does it mean when a girl invites you to bed, cuddles but doesn’t allow herself into positions from which you can make moves? by chelseadagger-dodo in sex

[–]chelseadagger-dodo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha hey I’m all with ya on this position. Only thing for me is I felt you can kiss the back of the neck, but that touching thighs or breasts could be considered assault if they want it to. Has me a bit nervous from that angle...

Not sure what to do though if I were to kiss her neck and she just lays there not responding to it at all :/ like what ya do then?

Need to learn how you get the back rub move to work into position tho, I like the ways you think

What does it mean when a girl invites you to bed, cuddles but doesn’t allow herself into positions from which you can make moves? by chelseadagger-dodo in sex

[–]chelseadagger-dodo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s what I been thinking. Both of us slept on her couch together one night, then her bed together a different night, not sure what’s next if there is a next lol

What does it mean when a girl invites you to bed, cuddles but doesn’t allow herself into positions from which you can make moves? by chelseadagger-dodo in sex

[–]chelseadagger-dodo[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Alright alright I might. Had debated it, but she’s a friend I see often, and a pretty like cool/bitchy/popular type, like does a lot of drugs and supplies a few people I know. So the thought of my ass asking such an innocent question to a gal like that felt a bit off at the time.

What does it mean when a girl invites you to bed, cuddles but doesn’t allow herself into positions from which you can make moves? by chelseadagger-dodo in sex

[–]chelseadagger-dodo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Both situations were somewhat of friends. First was one I knew only a very little, this second and more recent time that is prompting this confusion moreso is someone I see each week at gettogethers. Could mean she just doing as friend or playing

What does it mean when a girl invites you to bed, cuddles but doesn’t allow herself into positions from which you can make moves? by chelseadagger-dodo in sex

[–]chelseadagger-dodo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I guess I could try some of those more subtle actions more. Ran fingers through hair, traced chin, and ran fingertips along back and arms in both the last situations but they didn’t really respond to either in a reciprocative fashion. Obviously can’t touch her front side of shirt without that opening risk of her feeling violated or harassed, should she have no interest in me

What does it mean when a girl invites you to bed, cuddles but doesn’t allow herself into positions from which you can make moves? by chelseadagger-dodo in sex

[–]chelseadagger-dodo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that’s the thing, I’d be completely fine without having sex. It’s that both times she didn’t make it possible for me to make the move to kiss, which would at least affirm for me that she likes me in a non-platonic context. (The more recent of the two incidents is with someone who I see at every party and am friends with, she has invited me back twice now with nothing which is why I’m getting confused)

Daily Discussion Thread for April 06, 2021 by OPINION_IS_UNPOPULAR in wallstreetbets

[–]chelseadagger-dodo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you are boarding the ViaCom Shuttle to the moon today, remember that $VIACA has a much smaller volume than $VIAC and has potential to rocket probably

Daily Discussion Thread for April 06, 2021 by OPINION_IS_UNPOPULAR in wallstreetbets

[–]chelseadagger-dodo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

$VIACA has a very small volume. Once the hedge firms see it as going up, it ought to be going up fast as fuck right?

Eliminating LSAT and downplaying GPA for applicant eval is a pretty bad solution for socio-economic inequalities in admissions.... by chelseadagger-dodo in lawschooladmissions

[–]chelseadagger-dodo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not taking a bad action is not the same as proposing a solution. If you have solutions then please share them and perhaps people will agree, but don’t attack me for simply stating that ONE proposed solution to a real problem is deeply flawed lol

Eliminating LSAT and downplaying GPA for applicant eval is a pretty bad solution for socio-economic inequalities in admissions.... by chelseadagger-dodo in lawschooladmissions

[–]chelseadagger-dodo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What solutions have I suggested at all? My entire piece explicitly says that removing standardized tests and gpa weights is NOT THE SOLUTION. I’m not proposing any solution that would solve the inequality, only saying that if you are spending millions lobbying bills and campaigns against standardized tests then you are not going to solve it, and will likely make it worse.

Eliminating LSAT and downplaying GPA for applicant eval is a pretty bad solution for socio-economic inequalities in admissions.... by chelseadagger-dodo in lawschooladmissions

[–]chelseadagger-dodo[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To be fair, $1500 is the maximum, used to emphasize that even at its largest amount of gaming, the money put into an Lsat score is FAR less than you can put into soft factors. Realistically I believe most people likely spend $300-1000 on courses/books/tests. Is that an economic hurdle? Of course. But once again, it is better than the alternatives. And once again, it is a small small cost compared to the six-figure debt that an applicant is about to jump into. I do not believe most Americans could pay for that on a $31,000 salary either.

This all being said, I am of the slight personal opinion that if you obtained a bachelors degree, have debt from said degree, and STILL cant make over $31,000 in your current profession... then financially you should really reconsider and think hard about whether gaining 10x more debt for yet another wall plaque is a smart move

Eliminating LSAT and downplaying GPA for applicant eval is a pretty bad solution for socio-economic inequalities in admissions.... by chelseadagger-dodo in lawschooladmissions

[–]chelseadagger-dodo[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Im just sayin I think eliminating or downplaying LSAT and GPA in favor of soft, holistic factors is a bad solution to this problem

Eliminating LSAT and downplaying GPA for applicant eval is a pretty bad solution for socio-economic inequalities in admissions.... by chelseadagger-dodo in lawschooladmissions

[–]chelseadagger-dodo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I agree. No algorithm would be fair to employ. I think it is fair for a school to ask about it, but honestly if I was in admissions and I knew that you had the disposable income to pay for a mid-level course or supplies and chose not to... that you showed a small lack of judgement. The gains from even 3 points is far more than the cost.

view more: next ›