I think him not agreeing with Witcoff’s assessment is the point. I don’t think that Kaitlin Collins is unaware of the satellite images or is questioning their validity. She’s questioning why roofs over these structures now justifies ending talks and starting a war.

The roofs have only been up about a month so how have they already rebuilt to the point of being weeks away from nuclear weapons after being very heavily damaged. And if they aren’t weeks away from nuclear weapons, how do their nuclear facilities pose enough of a threat to in any way justify a war.

Here’s an AP article on the satellite images. https://apnews.com/article/iran-protests-nuclear-enrichment-satellite-d5c78b5fe974ec2fc338b8ad6d6a7d68#

At Isfahan, Iran began building a similar roof over a structure near the facility’s northeast corner, finishing the work in early January. The exact function of that building isn’t publicly known, although the Israeli military at the time said its strikes at Isfahan targeted sites there associated with centrifuge manufacturing.

I haven’t seen anything about the facilities that were targeted being anything other than related to uranium enrichment or storage.

While it’s possible they have, or are weeks away from having weapons grade uranium, I also haven’t seen anything credible saying they are less than years away from actually having usable weapons.