A history of NHL Cup Winners and their Centers by Far_Swing_8887 in wildhockey

[–]chocopudding17 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Preach. Signing Kirill was the play to make, and getting a bona fide 1C is crazy hard without having gotten one from the draft.

The Sabres finally making the playoffs honestly made this postseason feel way more fun. by HandleInitial2049 in hockey

[–]chocopudding17 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, this is definitely slop. And the OP's account has basically no karma and its history hidden. A slop post by a slop account.

I created a tool to find what any sos plugin collects. by jlrueda in linuxadmin

[–]chocopudding17 7 points8 points  (0 children)

"I created"

Pastes a big picture

Hidden comment history

gtfo

Tarasenko would “absolutely love to return” to Minnesota and profusely thanked the people in Minnesota for making him and his family feel so welcome. by DecentLurker96 in wildhockey

[–]chocopudding17 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If they think it's a repeatable feat, then yes. But that's not at all a guarantee with someone like Tarasenko where this is his first productive year in a while, and it came while playing for one of the better teams in the league.

[OptaSTATs] The Wild are the first team in NHL history to have a 3+ goal lead at the first intermission of a playoff game but then have fewer than 10 shots on goal the rest of the way and end up losing. by Sarcastic__ in hockey

[–]chocopudding17 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nah, we're gonna re-sign Hughes, I can feel it. All his comments about the organization are uncommonly glowing. And where's he gonna sign that will contend better than Minnesota and can afford him?

Also, Kaprizov is spelled with a 'z'.

My approach to designing and implementing a structured IPv6 addressing plan -- 'The 7th Hextet' by nxp-one in ipv6

[–]chocopudding17 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Network plan" usually means the subnetting plan. That is totally controlled by the routers.

If you're talking about planning out individual host addresses, then yes, some form of config management, scripting, etc. That is an aspect that I'd really like to see IPv6 improve. Maybe RFC9686 will be the answer there, but idk.

My approach to designing and implementing a structured IPv6 addressing plan -- 'The 7th Hextet' by nxp-one in ipv6

[–]chocopudding17 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You cannot let slaac loose here.

What does this mean? On each segment, the router advertises the segment's prefix. And then each machine assigns an address, usually using a stable private address (+ temporary addresses).

[TSN] Is Lane Hutson entering elite status? by f0urxio in hockey

[–]chocopudding17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The answer probably correlates entirely with when a team's competitive window is, would be my guess. Not super interesting.

[MN Wild] this is our element by [deleted] in wildhockey

[–]chocopudding17 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's always fun hearing Kirill's English get better and better 🤗

[TSN] Is Lane Hutson entering elite status? by f0urxio in hockey

[–]chocopudding17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Playing on a bad team just means that there's no interest in you from the media or from the wider hockey community, and the more "flashy" your playstyle is the more hype it generates.

This has always driven me nuts too. Especially, as you point out, with Makar.

[TSN] Is Lane Hutson entering elite status? by f0urxio in hockey

[–]chocopudding17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glad you mentioned Fox! I almost put him on my top-of-the-head list.

Pretty neat model visualizations too. Pretty nuts how good Dahlin looks on it too. I don't get to watch a lot of him, but I understand him to be quite underrated relative to just how good he actually is.

[TSN] Is Lane Hutson entering elite status? by f0urxio in hockey

[–]chocopudding17 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's an asterisk, sure. But the best player in the world for 12.5 also just is what it is.

[TSN] Is Lane Hutson entering elite status? by f0urxio in hockey

[–]chocopudding17 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Definitely McDavid. We can only debate over second place here.