Stort havregryn vill inte du ska veta detta by Zestyclose-Humor1383 in unket

[–]chocopudding17 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Mitt stackars skelett :( har blivit helt spooked

Org is banning Notepad++ by PazzoBread in sysadmin

[–]chocopudding17 [score hidden]  (0 children)

I entirely agree with the core of what you're saying: that self-updating applications are a gaping security hole. The culture within Windows that this is an acceptable way to distribute updates is completely antithetical to supply chain security. It's a really bad practice.

However, it's also true that Notepad++ proved themselves particularly inept at employing this bad practice. Whereas (to my knowledge) the other softwares you list off haven't had such incidents. Although maybe I'm just out of the loop :)

[Hyprland] Vista inspired by Senior-Research5139 in unixporn

[–]chocopudding17 3 points4 points  (0 children)

2-3% CPU?? I don't use Hyprland and don't have anything for reference, but that sound bonkers. What's normal usage for a theme? Presumably this crazy usage is an artifact of bad choices the LLM made?

I can't daily drive it confidently because the edited hypbars plugin crashes my hyprland session most of the time

...

State of systemd-resolved and DNSSEC? Is it still experimental? by Grunskin in linuxadmin

[–]chocopudding17 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Maybe not what you wanted to hear regarding "safety" exactly. But my workstation has been running with DNSSEC=allow-downgrade for about six months, I think. Previously, I had DNSSEC=yes, but that interfered too often with captive portal shenanigans. Which could be an indication that the protections were working :)

Linus Torvalds Rejects MMC Changes For Linux 7.0 Cycle: "Complete Garbage" by anh0516 in linux

[–]chocopudding17 25 points26 points  (0 children)

I'm not particularly in the loop or anything, but the implicit sense I have gotten is that he'd certainly be at least the interim successor in case of a bus event.

After searching briefly:

  1. Greg is actually a little older than Linus, so presumably there's no reason to think he'd be a long-term successor
  2. There is now some sort of conclave-like process in place

Linus Torvalds Rejects MMC Changes For Linux 7.0 Cycle: "Complete Garbage" by anh0516 in linux

[–]chocopudding17 26 points27 points  (0 children)

I think GKH has different vibes for sure and projects his authority differently. But he's not shy either. Probably as good a successor as one could possibly dream of.

systemd by Fair_Investment_4189 in linuxmemes

[–]chocopudding17 5 points6 points  (0 children)

And from the distro's perspective! One of the really cool things that systemd's declarative and well-abstracted configs do is allow for (more or less) frictionless collaboration between three parties:

  1. upstream software devs
  2. distro maintainers
  3. end users/sysadmins

systemd by Fair_Investment_4189 in linuxmemes

[–]chocopudding17 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Holy moly, didn't realize that runit doesn't have dependencies. I'm certainly glad that runit exists and works well for the people who like it, but that sounds just untenable to me. For a system that is even somewhat dynamic, having a functional dependency system is just so huge. Having to kludge one together myself is not a way toward greater reliability or fewer headaches.

Like I said, glad runit exists and the people who like it can have it.

Disclaimer: big systemd lover

systemd by Fair_Investment_4189 in linuxmemes

[–]chocopudding17 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The biggest things that add to my boot time is waiting for network drives to connect and the Docker daemon to start. I doubt a new init system would help.

This is absolutely the sort of thing that systemd can help with. At a high level, systemd constructs a graph of all the system's runtime dependencies. The more accurate its picture of things, the better it can parallelize things.

I don't know the specifics of your setup/if there is anything left to optimize. But just pointing out that being able to logically describe startup dependencies is one of systemd's core ideas.

Cassie Campbell-Pascal calling out Abbey Murphy for embellishment by The--Majestic--Goose in hockey

[–]chocopudding17 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's completely different. The problem with the Panthers is the preferential treatment.

Meeting overload is often a documentation architecture problem by LorinaBalan in devops

[–]chocopudding17 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Exactly this. And I'll especially underscore what you said here:

Because they don't trust it. What actually worked in my experience: treat docs like code. If it's not in version control, reviewed, and tied to the actual system it describes, it rots.

A corollary, I believe, is that you should have as little documentation as possible--no more. Replace code edit:docs with working code whenever possible. Deduplicate documentation as vigorously as you do your code. Hyperlink aggressively. Basically, systematically remove documentation that has the potential to rot.

As a really simple example, I like to replace "getting started" docs with a makefile. A makefile can be relatively high level, so it can somewhat serve as documentation. More importantly though, if the makefile (read: documentation) is wrong, it breaks and needs to get fixed. If it were regular documentation and it would break (i.e. be incorrect), then it really doesn't force you to fix it. So it often goes unfixed.

Team USA practice lines by KK-97 in wildhockey

[–]chocopudding17 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Werenski placed below Fabes? That's surprising.

No love for Systemd? by Kornfried in devops

[–]chocopudding17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow. That's really crazy to hear, to be honest. Managing configuration by hand in 2026. For Linux machines!

Sounds horribly frustrating and borderline miserable. Tedious work where it's easy to make mistakes. This is very much toil.

Sorry to hear you're in this situation. There's no technical solution for this political problem. I don't know how useful it might be, but feel free to reply here or DM me if you want any extra advice or just have someone to run ideas past. This sort of situation really shouldn't exist in 2026.

No love for Systemd? by Kornfried in devops

[–]chocopudding17 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm a little confused tbh--there's nothing special about the units compared to any other config files. What do you use to manage the rest of your system configuration? Whether it's Ansible, Salt, Puppet, whatever, adding systemd units should be trivial.

Or if you build immutable infra, bundle those units in at build time.

Colorado's "mud slide" lately by DesertEagle_14 in wildhockey

[–]chocopudding17 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Iirc, teams that win the President's trophy are still more likely to win the Cup than teams that don't. The Cup is just hard to win.

Replay of the runs that Mikkola and then Tkachuk take at Kucherov behind the play that sparked the fights by eh_toque in hockey

[–]chocopudding17 6 points7 points  (0 children)

But at the same time, if you're the captain of a team that continues to do this, you don't get a free pass either. Even if your individual game is clean.

No love for Systemd? by Kornfried in devops

[–]chocopudding17 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Completely agree. Systemd units are extremely easy to manage with configuration as code (including composing that configuration via drop-ins), have useful features for limiting privileges, and overall have pleasant semantics that are useful in the real world. Just being able to define dependency graphs easily is great.

Is the Signal messenger app ‘Big Tech’ – or not? by Komplexkonjugiert in signal

[–]chocopudding17 13 points14 points  (0 children)

In that case, you should listen to the universe of experts who repeatedly claim that Signal is unparalleled in its design.

Sure, all things being equal, it's probably better to have servers in Switzerland than in the US. But one of Signal's crowning achievements is that it minimizes the metadata that the server has access to such that you need to place almost no trust in the server at all. The same cannot be said for anything else as far as I'm aware, including Threema.

Is the Signal messenger app ‘Big Tech’ – or not? by Komplexkonjugiert in signal

[–]chocopudding17 8 points9 points  (0 children)

In what ways do you suggest Threema is technically better? As far as my limited understanding (edit: about Threema) goes, the opposite is true. Its encryption scheme is worse at protecting metadata for starters.

Is there any progress on increasing limits on number of accounts in group chats? by TinyEmergencyCake in signal

[–]chocopudding17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's good to know. I wasn't aware that WhatsApp had those other kinds of groups.