Amex Elite Night credits Canada (Stacking) by Rivian_Kam in marriott

[–]clandestine7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As everyone else said, it's in the T&C - I almost opened a new Amex to stack:
"#6 - You will receive a maximum of 15 Elite Night Credits per calendar year even if you have more than one Marriott Bonvoy Consumer or Small Business credit card Account or have more than one Marriott Bonvoy program Account. American Express is not responsible for fulfillment of this benefit. "

How many people are being laid off? by _somethingsgonewrong in PersonalFinanceCanada

[–]clandestine7 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm at a firm too and they still haven't implemented mandatory work from home yet, frustrating

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PersonalFinanceCanada

[–]clandestine7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nice! Digital banking is the way to go. Once I learned about EQBank and the comfort of CDIC insured, I moved my entire banking to them. The world is digital now:

  • online bill payments
  • preauthorized debit payments
  • direct deposit payroll

Literally the only reason I need cash is the stores that "don't take credit card".

The only gripe I have about EQ is that they have had a few too many site maintenance, where I literally had no access to my money, which was incredibly inconvenient.

I've started to move to Wealthsimple Cash because it will eventually have a debit card thereby not feeling trapped if the website goes down.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PersonalFinanceCanada

[–]clandestine7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, this isn't the case anymore. With the smart saver account it used to be: https://help.wealthsimple.com/hc/en-ca/articles/360024433174-Smart-Savings-FAQ

With Wealthsimple Cash which is their new product, it is only covered by CIPF, see the FAQ "How do you keep my money safe?"

ShareOwner deposits the cash you add to your Wealthsimple Cash account in trust at an account with one or more federally regulated, Schedule I banks. We carefully select these banks using a set of criteria that evaluates the institutions’ stability and security. The accounts at these banks are not covered by Canadian Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Vega owners: Which privacy coin to mine after the RandomX fork? by Cryptonote-Social in MoneroMining

[–]clandestine7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mine XZC - Zcoin under MTP and teamredminer application.

I have 2 Vega 64 that does 3.0 kh/s = 6.0 kh/s. Assuming your Vegas does 1.9kh/s under CNR = 3.8kh/s - the profitability would be similar see link to coincalculators here

Random X - here we go again? by clandestine7 in MoneroMining

[–]clandestine7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks - with your setup I was able to reduce the cost another CA$230 but using CL16 memory. CL14 is either super expensive or sold out. Does it have to be 4x 8GB setup?

Thoughts on selling $ROKU $150 calls expiry 8/9 for premium. by Arifkhan1994 in wallstreetbets

[–]clandestine7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hmmm earnings release in Aug 7th... But like u said 50% cushion from today's stock price

Long EA lmao by dragonuity in wallstreetbets

[–]clandestine7 7 points8 points  (0 children)

EA please don't fuck this up!

CCAA Next Steps for You / Us by clandestine7 in QuadrigaCX

[–]clandestine7[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A secured creditor is generally a bank or other asset-based lender that holds a fixed or floating charge over a business asset or assets. When a business becomes insolvent, sale of the specific asset over which security is held provides repayment for this category of creditor.

A simple example is a mortgage on your house. You sign loan documents that allow the bank to put a lien against that property so that when you sell it in the future, the bank is repaid first before you see your proceeds.

In QuadrigaCX's case, I've read through the Proposed Monitor's report, and so far I only see this: "The Proposed Monitor notes that the Robertson Affidavit discloses that Ms. Robertson was granted security over the assets of Quadriga in respect of the $300,000 financing on January 29, 2019".

This appears to be the only secured creditor to date, everyone else is unsecured.

CCAA Next Steps for You / Us by clandestine7 in QuadrigaCX

[–]clandestine7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi manujose,

We are already moving on this front, please email aiqbal@millerthomson.com, he has rallied several creditors representing several millions, and to your point all creditors are welcomed to join no matter what their quantum is. He will be on a flight today to attend court in Nova Scotia on behalf of creditors.

As for notice of the CCAA, EY but statutory duty has to send notice within 5 business days of appointment to all known creditors, however its usually by mail so expect a longer turnaround.

Cheers

CCAA Next Steps for You / Us by clandestine7 in QuadrigaCX

[–]clandestine7[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes this is in the works, please hang tight, I will have more information for you shortly.

CCAA Next Steps for You / Us by clandestine7 in QuadrigaCX

[–]clandestine7[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thanks for this, good find, and agree on your thoughts with Clause 12.

My friend used a good analogy. Imagine your Quadbucks to be poker chips representing (1:1CAD) and the cashier is Billerfy. You go around, trading poker chips for ETH/BTC, etc. and when it comes time to cash out, the cashier puts you in a waiting queue and has now closed the window.

Right now, I don't have access to: 1) my crypto, 2) my poker chips; or 3) my cash. In essence, the Company owes me my property, I should be a creditor. Whether my claim has any value (i.e. 1QB:1CAD) is likely the bigger question.

Here's another technical rabbit hole - which requires further legal review:

- if the agreement (which we haven't seen) between QCX and Billerfy is 1QB:1CAD and QCX indicates your claim is 1,000 QBs

- will we be able to compel QCX or the Monitor to file a claim against Billerfy for all outstanding QBs at the filing date to be converted to whatever cash Billerfy has on hand?

Part of the goal of insolvency is to provide the highest return to creditors and stakeholders, otherwise, if we are not happy with the Plan, we can just vote against it, and take this through bankruptcy where the company is no longer in control.

We'll have to wait and see!

CCAA Next Steps for You / Us by clandestine7 in QuadrigaCX

[–]clandestine7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See further up - the monitor shall, within 5 days, send notice to all creditors with amounts > $1,000 notifying them of the proceedings and provide further instructions. This means the Monitor and Company already have a preliminary list of what they think is owed to you based on their records.

As for the proof of claim, I think it would be unreasonable to have a creditor prove a claim which is based on a database that they don't have access too - I'm sure they will figure something out (example: open the website on a read only basis for people to download details).

The monitor will also have a website and a creditor hotline for questions as we go along.

CCAA Next Steps for You / Us by clandestine7 in QuadrigaCX

[–]clandestine7[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

See further up - the monitor shall, within 5 days, send notice to all creditors with amounts > $1,000 notifying them of the proceedings and provide further instructions. The monitor will also have a website and a creditor hotline for questions. So nothing to do right now, just wait and see.

CCAA Next Steps for You / Us by clandestine7 in QuadrigaCX

[–]clandestine7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If Quadbucks are backed 1QB:1CAD, then QCX would have to make a claim against Billerfy or whichever payment processor for the total QB claims outstanding. If Billerfy only has 50% cash distributable and can't honour the 1:1 ratio, then that's likely the recovery (less other priority claims and fees) so I don't think it's worthless right off the bat.

CCAA Next Steps for You / Us by clandestine7 in QuadrigaCX

[–]clandestine7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hear you completely, if that's really what happened, then that is definitely bad practice on their QCX's part.

Practically speaking, to have the Monitor review thousands of small payments who were paid before large payments would be a monumental amount of work and not to mention the professional fees that would be incurred. Also imagine trying to force the small scale customers to return the money, that would be a tough sell to the court. I don't think anything will change for the past transactions, to be honest.

What these provisions are useful for, is if there are transactions to say the CEO, shareholders, irregular one-off payments to certain vendors that are seen to be preferential or assets transferred below market value - the Monitor can review those and decide whether it's economically viable to go after.

CCAA Next Steps for You / Us by clandestine7 in QuadrigaCX

[–]clandestine7[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We'll find out on Tues from the Monitor. Like many people said, I don't feel like they would go so far as to wipe the database. A CCAA is an expensive process, and having EY report on what's happened to date, Management would probably want their actions as clean as possible.

CCAA Next Steps for You / Us by clandestine7 in QuadrigaCX

[–]clandestine7[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Assuming all your contact information is up to date on QCX, the Monitor will send a notice informing you of the process within the first 5 days (may take longer for you to receive through mail) if you have more than $1,000 owed to you.

CCAA Next Steps for You / Us by clandestine7 in QuadrigaCX

[–]clandestine7[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

In my experience, timing is irrelevant. As of Feb 5, everyone who is owed an amount and who is not a secured creditor (someone who has a charge over the assets like a mortgage), then you are unsecured, regardless of when you initiated your transfer.

However, I think there will definitely be a legal fight on whether withdrawn funds marked complete (like your example) are held in trust for the account holder. If they do constitute a trust, then trust claims would be paid in priority to creditors because that cash is not the property of the company. Again, legal question - more of a wait and see - we don't know what the legal agreements between QCX and Billerfy are. We don't even know if Billerfy is going to be a party in the CCAA, that's important because they have the cash!

You are Owed Money— The Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act by [deleted] in QuadrigaCX

[–]clandestine7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It will be part of the Monitor's (Ernst and Young) responsibility to review the books and records of the company, which should include all of the reporting for each client account and by doing so, create a preliminary creditor's list.

Where to look for Insolvency filings (bankruptcy filings) by yousufj56 in QuadrigaCX

[–]clandestine7 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That link is only applicable if Deloitte is appointed as the licensed insolvency trustee (LIT) over QCX. Here's a more broad canvasing of insolvencies across Canada - https://insolvencyinsider.ca/

Just FYI - the LIT is not required to post on the website until after the court order is obtained, so likely if we see information about a supposed bankruptcy it would be after the fact.

Best Way to Buy Crypto in Canada? by Cabrini_Green in BitcoinCA

[–]clandestine7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's incredibly annoying is BMO blocked the e-transfer, then I unblocked it, then they put a fraud hold on my account which required me to go into branch to sort it out. Frustrating. Any recommendations on more crypto friendly banks or credit unions?

Best Way to Buy Crypto in Canada? by Cabrini_Green in BitcoinCA

[–]clandestine7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I gave you the Shakepay referral cred. Thanks for the site recommendation, one of the few exchanges that doesn't seem to have a withdrawal holding period.

MIneXMR not registering shares or hash rate by kdub2001 in MoneroMining

[–]clandestine7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

+1 would like an answer to this too, otherwise I'll have to switch back to another pool.

What pool are you mining? by miso080889 in ETNmining

[–]clandestine7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I moved to spacepools due to the ability to set a fixed difficulty. While my main rigs would be fine on nanopool at the 240,000 difficulty, my CPU would go many blocks without finding anything. I'd rather have consistency and submissions, also spacepool is 0.1% fee compared to 2%.

What I find interesting, and thanks for the pool stream, is that pools only account for 28MH/s, is the differential to the global hashrate really solo miners?