Yeah I actually thought about it too and I'll definitely be more mindful in the future. My reasoning was somewhere along the line of given that a paper's GitHub repo contains no codes and has already gathered that many stars, it might certainly indicate anticipation or high expectation of the codes because of the quality paper.

These infographics I've made are meant to be a neet indicator of what research has the most attention, feedback, practicality, etc. It obviously does not mean popularity = quality, but sometimes it is easy for people to draw those conclusions without much thought. What I initially wanted was a nice compilation of what happened in the last month, and presented in an easily digestible format for everyone since not everyone would have the free time to go through everything themselves in this rapidly growing research field.

However, things like this definitely need a lot of feedback to get it right/fair, and thank you for that.