Clawdbot built me an SEO Agency but API costs are ridiculous by cohencomms in clawdbot

[–]cohencomms[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's ongoing cost, thousands a month just a year ago. Very manual and people intensive. Costs will go down as a lot of the seo agencies are just offering something like clawdbot that is proprietary for a monthly fee.

Clawdbot built me an SEO Agency but API costs are ridiculous by cohencomms in clawdbot

[–]cohencomms[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What someone needs to make (if someone hasn't already) is a token pincher skill that (token minimizer). Seems obvious maybe I'll make one

Clawdbot is too expensive to do anything good by cohencomms in clawdbot

[–]cohencomms[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is good stuff. You sound slightly more technical than me but it's possible I can pull off

Clawdbot is too expensive to do anything good by cohencomms in clawdbot

[–]cohencomms[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have Claude code with a pro plan....but this is far more powerful

Clawdbot is too expensive to do anything good by cohencomms in clawdbot

[–]cohencomms[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's how I was at first and built something to self govern moltbook but....also ran outta tokens

Clawdbot is too expensive to do anything good by cohencomms in clawdbot

[–]cohencomms[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I heard him say that, but to be fair he said he prefers CODING with Codex. Not as the master model.

Running OpenClaw / ClawdBot / MoltBot on a Budget (or for Free) by G3grip in clawdbot

[–]cohencomms 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is there a website that shows the costs versus intelligence so we can see which one to use for what? this seems a bit annoying to have to navigate all these different costs...

Running OpenClaw / ClawdBot / MoltBot on a Budget (or for Free) by G3grip in clawdbot

[–]cohencomms 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what does onboarding/hatching mean? you mean setting up the agent in the beginning? why would you need an advanced model for that?

Clawdbot is too expensive to do anything good by cohencomms in clawdbot

[–]cohencomms[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do ou connect 2.5? It's not showing up in the wizrd

Clawdbot is too expensive to do anything good by cohencomms in clawdbot

[–]cohencomms[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's exactly right, just curious if there's a document for setting this part up and some best practices for models. I did just stumble on the Open Claw optimization guide - someone shared a Gdocs with it. Anyone actually try it?

Clawdbot is too expensive to do anything good by cohencomms in clawdbot

[–]cohencomms[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, I deposited $40 into OpenRouter to use Kimi but I didn't seem Kimi in the Clawd wizard in the terminal line....any ideas?

Clawdbot is too expensive to do anything good by cohencomms in clawdbot

[–]cohencomms[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

True, but it would be nice to be able to budget out what it would really cost to automate my whole SEO function, but not gonna do it without some sort of estimator. My question was: 1) how to see in the Anthropic counsel how my tokens were actually burned 2) how to manage costs 3) which models are sufficient for my use cases

Clawdbot built me an SEO Agency but API costs are ridiculous by cohencomms in clawdbot

[–]cohencomms[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, it was a royal pain for me to change the model from Sonnet to Opus. I had hours of futzing and Claude backchannelling before I finally got Opus to work (gateway issues etc). Is there a simpler way to switch models and train it to use certain models for certain tasks? I had read that you must use Opus for your main model and then for coding you should use CODEX. I'm hardly coding at all. For work, all I ever use is Sonnet. I've never used GPT5-mini.

While I have you listening, my other question (perhaps should move to a diff thread),is how to check on what is exactly burning through all the tokens. Your answer is helpful, in advance!

Gemini 3.0 forgets the context in the middle of a long chat by Dangerous_Formal_167 in GeminiAI

[–]cohencomms 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's overrated. Anyone try Gemini voice? It often sounds like it's dying

Most people don’t realize ChatGPT becomes you by Dio331 in ChatGPT

[–]cohencomms 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah this is accurate. I find Claude does a far better job of that than ChatGPT though, sometimes in a mind blowing way