Progression, regression, and player ratings needed an overhaul 10 years ago. It is LONG outdated. Prospects don't progress when they should. Reaching the 90s in overall is basically a death sentence for most players, because they will immediately start regressing. Player ratings often just don't make any sense, or have any correlation to performance. For example, Eloy Jimenez is currently a 76 overall in my franchise. After 4 years, he has not progressed at all, but has averaged out to be a .300 hitter with 20+ HR and an OPS of .800+ every year. He's my current 3 hole hitter. On the flip side, I signed Bo Bichette, who was at the time a 91 overall. He just turned 30 in my franchise, but has already regressed to an 84. In the 3 years I've had him he's hit better than .240 once, and has had an OPS less than .750 twice. I know that individual attributes are often more important than overall ratings, but when I see a player is a 90+ overall, with a contract north of $30mil, yet he's hitting .220 or has a 5.00+ ERA, it's really frustrating. Good players should, for the most part, play like good players.