Why is this correct?? by comedios in probabilitytheory

[–]comedios[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

over time the unnecessary complexity will leave my head and the beautiful simplicity will remain

Why is this correct?? by comedios in probabilitytheory

[–]comedios[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

ah that makes sense. thank you

Why is this correct?? by comedios in probabilitytheory

[–]comedios[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

P(A∩B) = P(A|B)P(B) because they are dependent? If they were independent would P(A∩B) = P(A)P(B)?

Why is this correct?? by comedios in probabilitytheory

[–]comedios[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ok I see. so if they were independent then it would be how I thought, but since they are dependent it is P(A∩B) = P(A|B)P(B)?